World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1564 1461 665 606 72 9852

Fernando Jaramillo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fernando Jaramillo between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fernando Jaramillo published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 3 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
2000 2025

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fernando Jaramillo: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 4
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 6
2008 2
2009 5
2010 1
2011 3
2012 6
2013 6
2014 11
2015 7
2016 1
2017 2
2018 1
2019 13
2020 6
2021 4
2022 1
2023 3
2024 0
2025 3
Total 97
Download as CSV

Fernando Jaramillo publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Jaramillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 70–74 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 72 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80 72
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Fernando Jaramillo D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Jaramillo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Fernando Jaramillo is affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, with a primary focus on Business, Management and Accounting. The scientist has contributed notably to subfields such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, and Education.

Their work emphasizes several key topics, including Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Ethics in Business and Education, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Workplace Spirituality and Leadership, Management Theory and Practice, Family Business Performance and Succession, and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences.

Fernando Jaramillo has published in various peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Service Research, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Business Research, European Journal of Marketing, and Revista Social Fronteriza. Recent papers include:

  • "Ethical Climate at the Frontline: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation" (2020, Journal of Service Research)
  • "Capability management control and salesperson turnover: A double-edged sword in a product complexity scenario" (2021, Industrial Marketing Management)
  • "The role of i-deals negotiated by small business managers in job satisfaction and firm performance: Do company ethics matter?" (2023, Journal of Business Research)
  • "Abusive supervision in retailing: the mediating role of customer orientation and the moderating roles of contingent reward and contingent punishment" (2020, European Journal of Marketing)
  • "Uso de inteligencia artificial en la gestión académica y administrativa para el fortalecimiento institucional en la educación superior: evolución e innovación digital" (2025, Revista Social Fronteriza)

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, including Zhiyong Yang, Scott B. Friend, Jeff S. Johnson, Belén Bande, and Takuma Kimura. Notably, Zhiyong Yang has co-authored multiple papers with Jaramillo.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents

    Cynthia Rodriguez Cano;Francois A. Carrillat;Fernando Jaramillo

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational commitment and salesperson job performance: 25 years of research

    Fernando Jaramillo;Jay Prakash Mulki;Greg W. Marshall

  • The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta‐analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents

    François A. Carrillat;Fernando Jaramillo;Jay P. Mulki

  • The Role of Ethical Climate on Salesperson’s Role Stress, Job Attitudes, Turnover Intention, and Job Performance

    Fernando Jaramillo;Jay Prakash Mulki;Paul Solomon

  • Effects of Ethical Climate and Supervisory Trust on Salesperson's Job Attitudes and Intentions to Quit.

    Jay Prakash Mulki;Fernando Jaramillo;William B. Locander

  • Examining the Impact of Servant Leadership on Salesperson’s Turnover Intention

    Fernando Jaramillo;Douglas B. Grisaffe;Lawrence B. Chonko;James A. Roberts

  • Emotional exhaustion and organizational deviance: Can the right job and a leader's style make a difference?

    Jay Prakash Mulki;Fernando Jaramillo;William B. Locander

  • Examining the Impact of Servant Leadership on Sales Force Performance

    Fernando Jaramillo;Douglas B. Grisaffe;Lawrence B. Chonko;James A. Roberts;James A. Roberts

  • Examining the impact of service quality: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence

    François A. Carrillat;Fernando Jaramillo;Jay Prakash Mulki

  • The effect of law enforcement stress on organizational commitment

    Fernando Jaramillo;Robert Nixon;Doreen Sams

  • Servant leadership and ethics: a dyadic examination of supervisor behaviors and salesperson perceptions

    Fernando Jaramillo;Belén Bande;Jose Varela

  • Advancing sales performance research: A focus on five underresearched topic areas

    Kenneth R. Evans;Richard G. McFarland;Bart Dietz;Fernando Jaramillo

  • Workplace Stressors, Job Attitude, and Job Behaviors: Is Interpersonal Conflict the Missing Link?

    Fernando Jaramillo;Jay Prakash Mulki;James S. Boles

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between sales orientation-customer orientation (SOCO) and salesperson job performance

    Fernando Jaramillo;Daniel M. Ladik;Greg W. Marshall;Jay Prakash Mulki

  • Emotions and salesperson propensity to leave: The effects of emotional intelligence and resilience

    Belén Bande;Pilar Fernández-Ferrín;José A. Varela;Fernando Jaramillo

  • Getting the job done: The moderating role of initiative on the relationship between intrinsic motivation and adaptive selling

    Fernando Jaramillo;William B. Locander;Paul E. Spector;Eric G. Harris

  • Sales Effort: The Intertwined Roles of the Leader, Customers, and the Salesperson

    Fernando Jaramillo;Jay Prakash Mulki

  • Does Customer Orientation Impact Objective Sales Performance? Insights from a Longitudinal Model in Direct Selling

    Fernando Jaramillo;Douglas B. Grisaffe

  • Regulation of emotions, interpersonal conflict, and job performance for salespeople

    Jay Prakash Mulki;Fernando Jaramillo;Emily A. Goad;Martha Rivera Pesquera

  • The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Salesperson Work Overload and Pay Satisfaction

    Jay Prakash Mulki;Felicia G. Lassk;Fernando Jaramillo

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Prakash Mulki
Jay Prakash Mulki Northeastern University
James S. Boles
James S. Boles University of North Carolina at Greensboro
William B. Locander
William B. Locander Louisiana Tech University
José Arana Varela
José Arana Varela Sao Paulo State University
Lawrence B. Chonko
Lawrence B. Chonko The University of Texas at Arlington
Paul E. Spector
Paul E. Spector University of South Florida
James A. Roberts
James A. Roberts Baylor University
Kenneth R. Evans
Kenneth R. Evans Lamar University
Raj Agnihotri
Raj Agnihotri Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Business and Management can open up a diverse range of career options. With the rise of remote learning, many students now consider online degrees for their flexibility and affordability. It's important to compare programs to find the best fit for your goals and budget.

For those interested in project oversight, a construction management degree cost can be a deciding factor when choosing to specialize in this growing field. Mid-career professionals seeking leadership roles often turn to an executive mba online, which is designed to advance management skills while balancing work commitments.

Cost remains a key concern, with many seeking the cheapest online masters to minimize student debt while maximizing value. Similarly, those aiming to work at the intersection of business and technology may consider a master online data science, which can open doors in analytics and decision-making roles.

No matter your area of interest, researching program costs, outcomes, and career pathways is crucial before enrolling in an online degree.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Jaramillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles