World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrea M. Philipp

Andrea M. Philipp

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10111 9463 483 476 87 6140

Andrea M. Philipp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea M. Philipp between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea M. Philipp published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2010. 6 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2010. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea M. Philipp: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 1
2004 7
2005 8
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 1
2010 9
2011 5
2012 2
2013 5
2014 2
2015 8
2016 4
2017 7
2018 6
2019 0
2020 5
2021 7
2022 4
2023 6
2024 4
2025 5
2026 1
Total 109
Download as CSV

Andrea M. Philipp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea M. Philipp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea M. Philipp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea M. Philipp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Control and interference in task switching--a review.

    Andrea Kiesel;Marco Steinhauser;Mike Wendt;Michael Falkenstein

  • The role of inhibition in task switching: A review

    Iring Koch;Iring Koch;Miriam Gade;Stefanie Schuch;Andrea M. Philipp;Andrea M. Philipp

  • Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).

    Christian Frings;Bernhard Hommel;Iring Koch;Klaus Rothermund

  • Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets

    Andrea M. Philipp;Miriam Gade;Iring Koch

  • A review of control processes and their locus in language switching.

    Mathieu Declerck;Andrea M. Philipp

  • Inhibition in language switching: what is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks?

    Andrea Mona Philipp;Iring Koch

  • Digits vs. pictures: The influence of stimulus type on language switching

    Mathieu Declerck;Iring Koch;Andrea M. Philipp

  • Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.

    Andrea M. Philipp;Pierre Jolicoeur;Michael Falkenstein;Iring Koch

  • The minimum requirements of language control: evidence from sequential predictability effects in language switching.

    Mathieu Declerck;Iring Koch;Andrea M. Philipp

  • Inhibition of Response Mode in Task Switching

    Iring Koch;Miriam Gade;Andrea Mona Philipp

  • Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching☆☆☆

    Mathieu Declerck;Mathieu Declerck;Jonathan Grainger;Iring Koch;Andrea Mona Philipp

  • Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

    Sarah Lukas;Andrea M. Philipp;Iring Koch

  • Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching

    Andrea M. Philipp;Iring Koch

  • A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.

    Arnaud Badets;Iring Koch;Andrea Mona Philipp

  • Chunking in Task Sequences Modulates Task Inhibition

    Iring Koch;Andrea Mona Philipp;Miriam Gade

  • Switching of Response Modalities

    Andrea Mona Philipp;Iring Koch

  • Bilingual control: sequential memory in language switching.

    Mathieu Declerck;Andrea M. Philipp;Iring Koch

  • The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?

    Himeh Horoufchin;Andrea M. Philipp;Iring Koch

  • Mixing costs and switch costs when switching stimulus dimensions in serial predictions

    Andrea Mona Philipp;Claudia Kalinich;Iring Koch;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • Differential roles of inferior frontal and inferior parietal cortex in task switching: evidence from stimulus-categorization switching and response-modality switching.

    Andrea M. Philipp;Ralph Weidner;Iring Koch;Gereon R. Fink

Frequent Co-Authors

Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Wilfried Kunde
Wilfried Kunde University of Würzburg
Andrea Kiesel
Andrea Kiesel University of Freiburg
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Michael Falkenstein
Michael Falkenstein TU Dortmund University
Klaus Rothermund
Klaus Rothermund Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Christian Frings
Christian Frings University of Trier
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University
Norbert Kathmann
Norbert Kathmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrea M. Philipp

Recently Published Articles