World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8074
World Ranking
6017
National Ranking
507

Marcus Meinzer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 148 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marcus Meinzer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcus Meinzer is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant contributions to the subfields of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Rehabilitation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Epidemiology.

The main topics of Meinzer's work include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Their recent scholarly articles reflect a focus on brain function, language, and rehabilitation:

  • "The Right Temporoparietal Junction Is Causally Associated with Embodied Perspective-taking," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery," 2021, Stroke
  • "Microstructural and functional plasticity following repeated brain stimulation during cognitive training in older adults," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Multisession transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates verbal learning and memory consolidation in young and older adults," 2020, Brain and Language
  • "A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement," 2022, Nature Protocols

Meinzer frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including:

  • Agnes Flöel
  • Andrew Martin
  • Mandy Roheger
  • David A. Copland
  • Daria Antonenko

Their works have appeared repeatedly across several publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Stroke
  • GeroScience
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Tinnitus Perception and Distress Is Related to Abnormal Spontaneous Brain Activity as Measured by Magnetoencephalography

    Nathan Weisz;Stephan Moratti;Marcus Meinzer;Katalin Dohrmann

  • Long-Term Stability of Improved Language Functions in Chronic Aphasia After Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy

    Marcus Meinzer;Daniela Djundja;Gabriela Barthel;Thomas Elbert

  • Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Cognitive Performance by Modulating Functional Connectivity and Task-Specific Activation

    Marcus Meinzer;Daria Antonenko;Robert Lindenberg;Stefan Hetzer

  • Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Temporarily Reverses Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Functional Brain Activity Changes

    Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Robert Lindenberg;Daria Antonenko;Tobias Flaisch

  • Extending the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) approach to cognitive functions: Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT) of chronic aphasia.

    Marcus Meinzer;Thomas Elbert;Daniela Djundja;Edward Taub

  • Functional re-recruitment of dysfunctional brain areas predicts language recovery in chronic aphasia.

    Marcus Meinzer;Tobias Flaisch;Caterina Breitenstein;Christian Wienbruch

  • Neural signatures of semantic and phonemic fluency in young and old adults

    Marcus Meinzer;Tobias Flaisch;Lotte Wilser;Carsten Eulitz

  • Intensive language training enhances brain plasticity in chronic aphasia.

    Marcus Meinzer;Thomas Elbert;Christian Wienbruch;Daniela Djundja

  • Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia.

    Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Robert Darkow;Robert Lindenberg;Agnes Flöel

  • Functional imaging and related techniques: An introduction for rehabilitation researchers

    Bruce Crosson;Bruce Crosson;Anastasia Ford;Keith M. McGregor;Keith M. McGregor;Marcus Meinzer

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: Behavioral effects and neural mechanisms.

    Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Robert Lindenberg;Mai Thy Phan;Lena Ulm;Lena Ulm

  • Short-Term Anomia Training and Electrical Brain Stimulation

    Agnes Flöel;Marcus Meinzer;Robert Kirstein;Sarah Nijhof

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary.

    Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Sophia Jähnigen;David A. Copland;Robert Darkow

  • Differential Effects of Dual and Unihemispheric Motor Cortex Stimulation in Older Adults

    Robert Lindenberg;Laura Nachtigall;Marcus Meinzer;Mira Maria Sieg

  • Imaging short- and long-term training success in chronic aphasia

    Ricarda Menke;Ricarda Menke;Marcus Meinzer;Marcus Meinzer;Harald Kugel;Michael Deppe

  • Intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia: Which aspects contribute most?

    Gabriela Barthel;Marcus Meinzer;Daniela Djundja;Brigitte Rockstroh

  • Recovery from aphasia as a function of language therapy in an early bilingual patient demonstrated by fMRI.

    Marcus Meinzer;Jonas Obleser;Tobias Flaisch;Carsten Eulitz

  • Stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances adaptive cognitive control: A high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation study

    Oyetunde Gbadeyan;Katie McMahon;Marco Steinhauser;Marcus Meinzer

  • Integrity of the hippocampus and surrounding white matter is correlated with language training success in aphasia.

    Marcus Meinzer;Siawoosh Mohammadi;Harald Kugel;Hagen Schiffbauer

  • Intensive language training in the rehabilitation of chronic aphasia: efficient training by laypersons.

    Marcus Meinzer;Silke Streiftau;Brigitte Rockstroh

Frequent Co-Authors

Agnes Flöel
Agnes Flöel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Caterina Breitenstein
Caterina Breitenstein University of Münster
David A. Copland
David A. Copland University of Queensland
Brigitte Rockstroh
Brigitte Rockstroh University of Konstanz
Bruce Crosson
Bruce Crosson Emory University
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology
Marco Steinhauser
Marco Steinhauser Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Meinzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles