World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
10913
World Ranking
5489
National Ranking
465

Winfried Schlee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfried Schlee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 228 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Winfried Schlee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Winfried Schlee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Winfried Schlee is affiliated with the University of Regensburg in Germany and specializes in neuroscience, with a primary focus on tinnitus and auditory-related conditions. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, neurology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

Their research covers a range of topics including hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics; hearing loss and rehabilitation; vestibular and auditory disorders; digital mental health interventions; multisensory perception and integration; mobile health and mHealth applications; as well as noise effects and management.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Winfried Schlee include:

  • Berthold Langguth
  • Rüdiger Pryss
  • Jorge Simões
  • Myra Spiliopoulou
  • Thomas Probst

Winfried Schlee has published in various academic venues, with the most common publication outlets being:

  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Progress in Brain Research
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Winfried Schlee include:

  • Global Prevalence and Incidence of Tinnitus, 2022, published in JAMA Neurology
  • Tinnitus prevalence in Europe: a multi-country cross-sectional population study, 2021, published in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants, 2020, published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • Combining Mobile Crowdsensing and Ecological Momentary Assessments in the Healthcare Domain, 2020, published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Systematic Review on Healthcare and Societal Costs of Tinnitus, 2021, published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Schlee's body of work focuses strongly on the neuroscience of hearing and auditory disorders, leveraging both neurological and psychological frameworks. The integration of mobile health technologies and digital interventions in their studies illustrates an interest in applying modern technological approaches to mental health and rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • Hearing loss prevalence and years lived with disability, 1990–2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Lydia M Haile;Kaloyan Kamenov;Paul Svitil Briant;Aislyn U Orji

  • Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm.

    Nadia Müller;Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann;Isabel Lorenz

  • The Neural Code of Auditory Phantom Perception

    Nathan Weisz;Simona Müller;Winfried Schlee;Katalin Dohrmann

  • High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferentation.

    Nathan Weisz;Thomas Hartmann;Katalin Dohrmann;Winfried Schlee

  • A review of physical and cognitive interventions in aging.

    P. D. Bamidis;A. B. Vivas;C. Styliadis;C. Frantzidis

  • Abnormal resting-state cortical coupling in chronic tinnitus

    Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann;Berthold Langguth;Nathan Weisz

  • Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)

    Dirk De Ridder;Winfried Schlee;Sven Vanneste;Alain Londero

  • Mapping cortical hubs in tinnitus

    Winfried Schlee;Nadia Mueller;Thomas Hartmann;Julian Keil

  • Resting-state slow wave power, healthy aging and cognitive performance

    Eleni L. Vlahou;Franka Thurm;Iris-Tatjana Kolassa;Winfried Schlee

  • Editorial: Towards an Understanding of Tinnitus Heterogeneity.

    Christopher R. Cederroth;Silvano Gallus;Deborah A. Hall;Tobias Kleinjung

  • Gains in cognition through combined cognitive and physical training: the role of training dosage and severity of neurocognitive disorder

    Panagiotis D. Bamidis;Patrick Fissler;Sokratis G. Papageorgiou;Vasiliki Zilidou

  • Using Auditory Steady State Responses to Outline the Functional Connectivity in the Tinnitus Brain

    Winfried Schlee;Nathan Weisz;Nathan Weisz;Olivier Bertrand;Thomas Hartmann

  • Ecological validity of virtual reality daily living activities screening for early dementia: longitudinal study.

    Ioannis Tarnanas;Winfried Schlee;Magda Tsolaki;René Martin Müri

  • Novelty interventions to enhance broad cognitive abilities and prevent dementia: synergistic approaches for the facilitation of positive plastic change.

    Patrick Fissler;Olivia Küster;Winfried Schlee;Iris-Tatjana Kolassa

  • Emotional states as mediators between tinnitus loudness and tinnitus distress in daily life: Results from the "TrackYourTinnitus" application.

    Thomas Probst;Ruediger Pryss;Berthold Langguth;Winfried Schlee

  • Neurofeedback for treating tinnitus.

    Katalin Dohrmann;Nathan Weisz;Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann

  • Measuring the Moment-to-Moment Variability of Tinnitus: The TrackYourTinnitus Smart Phone App.

    Winfried Schlee;Ruediger C. Pryss;Thomas Probst;Johannes Schobel

  • Mobile Crowd Sensing Services for Tinnitus Assessment, Therapy, and Research

    Rudiger Pryss;Manfred Reichert;Berthold Langguth;Winfried Schlee

  • Mobile Crowd Sensing in Clinical and Psychological Trials -- A Case Study

    Rudiger Pryss;Manfred Reichert;Jochen Herrmann;Berthold Langguth

  • Loss of alpha power is related to increased gamma synchronization-A marker of reduced inhibition in tinnitus?

    Isabel Lorenz;Nadia Müller;Winfried Schlee;Thomas Hartmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm
Thomas Probst
Thomas Probst University of Salzburg
Myra Spiliopoulou
Myra Spiliopoulou Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Nathan Weisz
Nathan Weisz University of Salzburg
Martin Schecklmann
Martin Schecklmann University of Regensburg
Iris-Tatjana Kolassa
Iris-Tatjana Kolassa University of Ulm
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Silvano Gallus
Silvano Gallus Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Winfried Schlee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles