World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
6598
World Ranking
6533
National Ranking
2832

James C. Saunders publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Saunders sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James C. Saunders D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James C. Saunders sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury: A review and tutorial.

    James C. Saunders;Steven P. Dear;Mark E. Schneider

  • Targeted mutagenesis of the POU-domain gene Brn4/Pou3f4 causes developmental defects in the inner ear.

    Deborah Phippard;Lihui Lu;Daniel Lee;James C. Saunders

  • Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations.

    Robert J. Dooling;James C. Saunders

  • The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update.

    James C. Saunders;Yale E. Cohen;Yvonne M. Szymko

  • Middle-ear development V: Development of umbo sensitivity in the gerbil

    Yale E Cohen;Daryl E Doan;David M Rubin;James C Saunders

  • Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick

    Edith A. McFadden;James C. Saunders

  • Hair cell damage produced by acoustic trauma in the chick cochlea.

    Douglas A. Cotanche;James C. Saunders;Lewis G. Tilney

  • The Role of Central Nervous System Plasticity in Tinnitus.

    James C. Saunders

  • A Comparative Analysis of Middle-Ear Function in Non-Mammalian Vertebrates

    J C Saunders;B M Johnstone

  • Evidence That Rapid Vesicle Replenishment of the Synaptic Ribbon Mediates Recovery from Short-Term Adaptation at the Hair Cell Afferent Synapse

    Maria A. Spassova;Michael Avissar;Adam C. Furman;Mark A. Crumling

  • The Middle Ear of Reptiles and Birds

    James C. Saunders;R. Keith Duncan;Daryl E. Doan;Yehudah L. Werner

  • The structural and functional aspects of hair cell regeneration in the chick as a result of exposure to intense sound

    James C. Saunders;Henry J. Adler;Frederic A. Pugliano

  • Sound transmission through the avian interaural pathways

    John J. Rosowski;James C. Saunders

  • Recovery of the basilar papilla following intense sound exposure in the chick.

    R. R. Marsh;Lerong Xu;J. P. Moy;J. C. Saunders

  • The maturation of frequency selectivity in C57BL/6J mice studied with auditory evoked response tuning curves.

    James C. Saunders;Kim G. Dolgin;Louis D. Lowry

  • A critical period for acoustic trauma in the hamster and its relation to cochlear development

    Gregory R. Bock;James C. Saunders

  • Chick cochlear hair cell exocytosis mediated by dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.

    Maria Spassova;James C. Saunders;Thomas D. Parsons

  • Tip-link integrity on chick tall hair cell stereocilia following intense sound exposure.

    Julian M. Husbands;Sheldon A. Steinberg;Rachel Kurian;James C. Saunders

  • Changes in cochlear microphonic sensitivity after priming C57BL/6j mice at various ages for audiogenic seizures.

    James C. Saunders;Kenneth A. Hirsch

  • Displacement of the malleus in neonatal golden hamsters.

    Evan M. Relkin;James C. Saunders

Frequent Co-Authors

Yale E. Cohen
Yale E. Cohen University of Pennsylvania
David T. Rubin
David T. Rubin University of Chicago
Franz M. Matschinsky
Franz M. Matschinsky University of Pennsylvania
Christopher A. Shera
Christopher A. Shera University of Southern California
Lewis G. Tilney
Lewis G. Tilney University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan Lifshitz
Jonathan Lifshitz University of Arizona
Joel H. Greenberg
Joel H. Greenberg University of Pennsylvania
Barbara Canlon
Barbara Canlon Karolinska Institute
Edward H. Egelman
Edward H. Egelman University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of dynamic career pathways, many of which offer strong earning potential and job stability. For those interested in maximizing their investment, some neuroscience-related fields rank among the highest paid college majors, including bioengineering, pharmacy, and computer science focused on neurotechnology.

Accessibility is also improving, as there are many online colleges that offer financial aid, making it easier for students to study neuroscience or a related field without taking on unmanageable debt. Students looking to enter the workforce quickly might consider easy licenses and certifications to get online, such as those in health technology, data analytics, or laboratory support—fields that complement neuroscience expertise.

For those seeking a more flexible or less demanding route, neuroscience intersects with some of the easiest college majors, like psychology or health sciences, which can be great stepping stones to specialized graduate study or entry-level roles in research and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing James C. Saunders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles