World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6154
World Ranking
7898
National Ranking
662

Peter Heil publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Heil sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Heil D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Heil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Heil is a researcher affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their work primarily focuses on neuroscience, with particular attention to cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, and speech and hearing. Their research spans several subfields including statistical and nonlinear physics and global and planetary change.

Themes central to their research encompass hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics; hearing loss and rehabilitation; noise effects and management; neural dynamics and brain function; stochastic dynamics and bifurcation; ecosystem dynamics and resilience; and acoustic wave phenomena research.

Peter Heil has authored publications in various peer-reviewed journals, reflecting contributions across multiple topics related to auditory processing and neuroscience. Some of their recent papers include the following:

  • "Inconsistent effects of stochastic resonance on human auditory processing" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Phase Locking of Auditory Nerve Fibers: The Role of Lowpass Filtering by Hair Cells" (2020, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "Validation of a Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tool for Aortic Valve Calcium Quantification" (2022, Structural Heart)
  • "Comparing and modeling absolute auditory thresholds in an alternative-forced-choice and a yes-no procedure" (2021, Hearing Research)
  • "A simplified physiological model of rate-level functions of auditory-nerve fibers" (2021, Hearing Research)

They collaborate frequently with several researchers, including Adam J. Peterson, Katharina S. Rufener, Julian Kauk, Philipp Ruhnau, and Stefan Repplinger.

Peter Heil's research has been published most prominently in the following venues:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Hearing Research
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Structural Heart

Best Publications

  • Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex

    R. Rajan;D. R. F. Irvine;Lisa Z. Wise;P. Heil

  • Multisensory processing via early cortical stages: Connections of the primary auditory cortical field with other sensory systems.

    E. Budinger;P. Heil;A. Hess;A. Hess;H. Scheich

  • Auditory cortical onset responses revisited: I. First-spike timing

    Peter Heil

  • Frequency and periodicity are represented in orthogonal maps in the human auditory cortex: evidence from magnetoencephalography

    G. Langner;M. Sams;P. Heil;H. Schulze

  • Functional Organization of Auditory Cortex in the Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). I. Electrophysiological Mapping of Frequency Representation and Distinction of Fields

    Hardy Thomas;Jochen Tillein;Peter Heil;Henning Scheich

  • First-spike latency of auditory neurons revisited.

    Peter Heil

  • First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex.

    Peter Heil;Dexter R. F. Irvine

  • AUDITORY CORTICAL ONSET RESPONSES REVISITED. II. RESPONSE STRENGTH

    Peter Heil

  • Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. II: Organization of response properties along the 'isofrequency' dimension.

    Peter Heil;R. Rajan;Dexter R.F. Irvine

  • Functional organization of auditory cortex in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). III. Anatomical subdivisions and corticocortical connections.

    Eike Budinger;Peter Heil;Henning Scheich

  • Topographic representation of tone intensity along the isofrequency axis of cat primary auditory cortex

    Peter Heil;R. Rajan;D.R.F. Irvine

  • Functional organization of auditory cortex in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). IV. Connections with anatomically characterized subcortical structures.

    Eike Budinger;Peter Heil;Henning Scheich

  • A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation

    Peter Heil;Heinrich Neubauer

  • New Insights into the Hemodynamic Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Response through Combination of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Recording in Gerbil Barrel Cortex

    Andreas Hess;Detlef Stiller;Thomas Kaulisch;Peter Heil

  • Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. I: Effects of variation of stimulus parameters.

    Peter Heil;R. Rajan;Dexter R.F. Irvine

  • Auditory activation of "visual" cortical areas in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi).

    Gilles Bronchti;Peter Heil;Ronen Sadka;Andreas Hess

  • Auditory pathway and auditory activation of primary visual targets in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): I. 2-deoxyglucose study of subcortical centers.

    Gilles Bronchti;Peter Heil;Henning Scheich;Zvi Wollberg

  • Processing of frequency-modulated stimuli in the chick auditory cortex analogue: evidence for topographic representations and possible mechanisms of rate and directional sensitivity.

    Peter Heil;Gerald Langner;Henning Scheich

  • Invasion of visual cortex by the auditory system in the naturally blind mole rat.

    Peter Heil;Gilles Bronchti;Zvi Wollberg;Henning Scheich

  • Parallels Between Timing of Onset Responses of Single Neurons in Cat and of Evoked Magnetic Fields in Human Auditory Cortex

    Silke Biermann;Peter Heil

  • Basic response properties of auditory nerve fibers: a review

    Peter Heil;Adam J. Peterson

Frequent Co-Authors

Dexter R. F. Irvine
Dexter R. F. Irvine Monash University
Henning Scheich
Henning Scheich Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Mikko Sams
Mikko Sams Aalto University
Ramesh Rajan
Ramesh Rajan Monash University
Riitta Hari
Riitta Hari Aalto University
Arnaud Delorme
Arnaud Delorme University of California, San Diego
André Schmidt
André Schmidt University of Basel
Manfred Laucht
Manfred Laucht Heidelberg University
Evdokia Anagnostou
Evdokia Anagnostou Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Gerard J. Byrne
Gerard J. Byrne University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Heil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles