World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
5779
World Ranking
7480
National Ranking
627

Frank W. Ohl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Ohl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank W. Ohl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Ohl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank W. Ohl is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology in Germany. Their research primarily lies within the field of Neuroscience, with a strong focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Sensory Systems.

Ohl's work covers several main topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Their publication record includes papers in notable venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Communications Biology
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • Journal of Neural Engineering

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Ohl include:

  • Ketamine anaesthesia induces gain enhancement via recurrent excitation in granular input layers of the auditory cortex, 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • Decentralized control and local information for robust and adaptive decentralized Deep Reinforcement Learning, 2021, Neural Networks
  • Task rule and choice are reflected by layer-specific processing in rodent auditory cortical microcircuits, 2020, Communications Biology
  • Acute and Long-Term Circuit-Level Effects in the Auditory Cortex After Sound Trauma, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Effects of Cortical Cooling on Sound Processing in Auditory Cortex and Thalamus of Awake Marmosets, 2022, Frontiers in Neural Circuits

Ohl frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Max F. K. Happel
  • Marcus Jeschke
  • Katrina E. Deane
  • Matthias Deliano
  • Malte Schilling

Best Publications

  • Change in pattern of ongoing cortical activity with auditory category learning

    F. W. Ohl;F. W. Ohl;H. Scheich;W. J. Freeman

  • Learning-induced plasticity in animal and human auditory cortex.

    Frank W Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Enhanced cognitive flexibility in reversal learning induced by removal of the extracellular matrix in auditory cortex

    Max F. K. Happel;Hartmut Niekisch;Laura L. Castiblanco Rivera;Frank W. Ohl

  • Bilateral ablation of auditory cortex in Mongolian gerbil affects discrimination of frequency modulated tones but not of pure tones.

    Frank W. Ohl;Wolfram Wetzel;Thomas Wagner;Alexander Rech

  • Singular perturbation analysis of competitive neural networks with different time scales

    Anke Meyer-Bäse;Frank Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Spectral Integration in Primary Auditory Cortex Attributable to Temporally Precise Convergence of Thalamocortical and Intracortical Input

    Max F K Happel;Marcus Jeschke;Frank W Ohl

  • Differential frequency conditioning enhances spectral contrast sensitivity of units in auditory cortex (field Al) of the alert Mongolian gerbil.

    Frank W. Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Non-sensory cortical and subcortical connections of the primary auditory cortex in Mongolian gerbils: bottom-up and top-down processing of neuronal information via field AI.

    Eike Budinger;Anna Laszcz;Holger Lison;Henning Scheich

  • Fallacies in behavioural interpretation of auditory cortex plasticity

    Frank W. Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Global versus local processing of frequency-modulated tones in gerbils: an animal model of lateralized auditory cortex functions.

    Wolfram Wetzel;Frank W. Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Orderly cortical representation of vowels based on formant interaction.

    Frank W. Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Right auditory cortex lesion in Mongolian gerbils impairs discrimination of rising and falling frequency-modulated tones.

    W Wetzel;F.W Ohl;T Wagner;H Scheich

  • The cognitive auditory cortex: task-specificity of stimulus representations.

    Henning Scheich;André Brechmann;Michael Brosch;Eike Budinger;Eike Budinger

  • Superposition of horseshoe‐like periodicity and linear tonotopic maps in auditory cortex of the Mongolian gerbil

    Holger Schulze;Andreas Hess;Frank W. Ohl;Henning Scheich

  • Differential Neuromodulation of Acquisition and Retrieval of Avoidance Learning by the Lateral Habenula and Ventral Tegmental Area

    Jason Shumake;Anton Ilango;Henning Scheich;Wolfram Wetzel

  • Topographic analysis of epidural pure-tone-evoked potentials in gerbil auditory cortex.

    Frank W. Ohl;H. Scheich;Walter J. Freeman

  • Neural basis of multisensory looming signals.

    Sascha Tyll;Björn Bonath;Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld;Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld;Hans-Jochen Heinze

  • Categorical discrimination of direction in frequency-modulated tones by Mongolian gerbils.

    W. Wetzel;T. Wagner;F.W. Ohl;H. Scheich

  • Dopamine-Modulated Recurrent Corticoefferent Feedback in Primary Sensory Cortex Promotes Detection of Behaviorally Relevant Stimuli

    Max F. K. Happel;Matthias Deliano;Juliane Handschuh;Frank W. Ohl;Frank W. Ohl

  • Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment

    Lars T. Boenke;Matthias Deliano;Frank W. Ohl;Frank W. Ohl

  • The cognitive auditory cortex: Task-specificity of stimulus representations

    H. Scheich

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Scheich
Henning Scheich Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Daphna Weinshall
Daphna Weinshall Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Walter J. Freeman
Walter J. Freeman University of California, Berkeley
Eckart D. Gundelfinger
Eckart D. Gundelfinger Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Barbara Caputo
Barbara Caputo Polytechnic University of Turin
Christoph Kayser
Christoph Kayser Bielefeld University
Peter Heil
Peter Heil Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Ohl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles