World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
20854
World Ranking
3746
National Ranking
1789

Robert Kozma publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Kozma sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 337 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert Kozma D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Kozma sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Kozma is affiliated with the University of Memphis in the United States. Their research spans an interdisciplinary range of fields, focusing primarily on cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and engineering applications related to brain function.

The scientist's recent publications demonstrate involvement in a diverse array of topics and venues. Notable papers include "DeSci Based on Web3 and DAO: A Comprehensive Overview and Reference Model" published in 2022 in the IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, "Global Workspace Theory (GWT) and Prefrontal Cortex: Recent Developments" from 2021 in Frontiers in Psychology, and "A hierarchical fused fuzzy deep neural network with heterogeneous network embedding for recommendation" also published in 2022 in Information Sciences. Additional works include "Strategy and Benchmark for Converting Deep Q-Networks to Event-Driven Spiking Neural Networks" (2021) in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and "Systems Science and Engineering Research in the Context of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Recollection, Trends, and Future Directions" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems.

Research collaboration forms a significant part of Kozma's academic activity. Frequent coauthors include Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Karen Panetta, Giancarlo Fortino, Mariagrazia Dotoli, and Sam Kwong. These collaborations indicate a broad network spanning various domains within engineering and computer science.

The scientist's publication venues often focus on systems science and engineering, with the primary outlets being:

  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine
  • Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • Sensors

Kozma's work is concentrated in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, electrical and electronic engineering, and computer vision and pattern recognition. These areas reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research combining computational methods and neural studies.

Main topics of research include neural dynamics and brain function, advanced memory and neural computing, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced graph neural networks, data visualization and analytics, as well as ferroelectric and negative capacitance devices. This thematic diversity indicates a comprehensive approach to understanding brain-related computational models and applied engineering challenges.

Best Publications

  • Learning with Media

    Robert B. Kozma

  • Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate

    Robert B. Kozma

  • Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena

    Robert B. Kozma;Joel Russell

  • Technology, innovation, and educational change : a global perspective : a report of the Second Information Technology in Education Study, Module 2

    Robert B. Kozma;Joke Voogt

  • The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding

    Robert Kozma

  • National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development

    Robert B. Kozma

  • Comparative Analysis of Policies for ICT in Education

    Robert B. Kozma

  • Technology and Classroom Practices

    Robert B. Kozma

  • 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2009)

    Pauline Haddow;David Halliday;Gunnar Tufte;Coello Coello

  • Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts

    Joel W. Russell;Robert B. Kozma;Tricia Jones;Joann Wykoff

  • Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT

    Robert B. Kozma;Ronald E. Anderson

  • Combining negative selection and classification techniques for anomaly detection

    F. Gonzalez;D. Dasgupta;R. Kozma

  • A reply: Media and methods

    Robert B. Kozma

  • 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence

    Honorary Chairs;Jacek Zurada;Andries Engelbrecht;Mengjie Zhang

  • The Implications of Cognitive Psychology for Computer-Based Learning Tools

    Robert B. Kozma

  • CHAOTIC RESONANCE — METHODS AND APPLICATIONS FOR ROBUST CLASSIFICATION OF NOISY AND VARIABLE PATTERNS

    Robert Kozma;Walter J. Freeman

  • Breathing as a Fundamental Rhythm of Brain Function

    Detlef H. Heck;Samuel S. McAfee;Yu Liu;Abbas Babajani-Feremi

  • The Virtual High School: Teaching Generation V

    Andrew A. Zucker;Robert Kozma

  • BindsNET: A Machine Learning-Oriented Spiking Neural Networks Library in Python.

    Hananel Hazan;Daniel J. Saunders;Hassaan Khan;Devdhar Patel

  • Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects A Handbook for Developing Countries

    Daniel A. Wagner;Bob Day;Tina James;Robert B. Kozma

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter J. Freeman
Walter J. Freeman University of California, Berkeley
Nikola Kasabov
Nikola Kasabov Auckland University of Technology
Hava T. Siegelmann
Hava T. Siegelmann University of Massachusetts Amherst
Leonid Perlovsky
Leonid Perlovsky Northeastern University
Paul J. Werbos
Paul J. Werbos University of Memphis
Béla Bollobás
Béla Bollobás University of Memphis
Lan Wang
Lan Wang University of Memphis
Dipankar Dasgupta
Dipankar Dasgupta University of Memphis
Paul Balister
Paul Balister University of Oxford
John R. N. Taylor
John R. N. Taylor University of Pretoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in computer science doesn’t have to follow a single path. Many students are now considering masters degrees that are worth it, focusing on in-demand programs that boost employability and long-term earning potential.

If you’re seeking a flexible entry point, an online associate degree in computer science can offer foundational skills at a rapid pace. These programs can be an affordable and practical choice, opening doors to entry-level positions or further study.

Cost remains a key consideration. Many students explore affordable online degree programs to lessen financial burdens. These options provide quality education without the high price tag, making higher education more accessible.

Concerned about your academic record? There are online colleges that accept low gpa, allowing motivated learners to pursue their goals despite past challenges. No matter your background, flexible online pathways in computer science can help you achieve your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Kozma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles