World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7000 6527 61 54 124 7365

Yoed N. Kenett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yoed N. Kenett between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yoed N. Kenett published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2024. 58 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2024. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 29 publications
2011 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yoed N. Kenett: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 1
2014 4
2015 2
2016 6
2017 5
2018 10
2019 15
2020 14
2021 19
2022 15
2023 27
2024 29
2025 29
Total 177
Download as CSV

Yoed N. Kenett publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoed N. Kenett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 124
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Yoed N. Kenett D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoed N. Kenett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yoed N. Kenett is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with notable focus on subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work covers a range of topics centered on creativity, education, neuroscience, and cognitive function. The main topics they address are:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Publication venues where Yoed N. Kenett has frequently contributed include:

  • Creativity Research Journal
  • Thinking Skills and Creativity
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Communications Biology
  • NeuroImage

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Kenett illustrate the scope of their research interests:

  • "Associative thinking at the core of creativity," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "The role of memory in creative ideation," 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors," 2020, Cortex
  • "The Process Definition of Creativity," 2023, Creativity Research Journal
  • "The relation between semantic memory structure, associative abilities, and verbal and figural creativity," 2020, Thinking & Reasoning

They have established collaborative relationships with various researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Roger E. Beaty
  • Mathias Benedek
  • Emmanuelle Volle
  • Marcela Ovando-Tellez
  • Anjan Chatterjee

Kenett's scholarship integrates psychological and neural perspectives on creativity, memory, and cognitive processes, contributing to interdisciplinary research that bridges cognition, educational neuroscience, and aesthetic perception.

Best Publications

  • Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity

    Roger E. Beaty;Yoed N. Kenett;Alexander P. Christensen;Monica D. Rosenberg

  • Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons.

    Yoed Nissan Kenett;David Anaki;Miriam Faust

  • Cognitive Network Science: A Review of Research on Cognition through the Lens of Network Representations, Processes, and Dynamics

    Cynthia S. Q. Siew;Cynthia S. Q. Siew;Dirk U. Wulff;Dirk U. Wulff;Nicole M. Beckage;Yoed N. Kenett

  • A Semantic Network Cartography of the Creative Mind.

    Yoed N. Kenett;Miriam Faust

  • How semantic memory structure and intelligence contribute to creative thought: a network science approach

    Mathias Benedek;Yoed N. Kenett;Konstantin Umdasch;David Anaki

  • Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis.

    Yoed N. Kenett;Yoed N. Kenett;Orr Levy;Dror Y. Kenett;H. Eugene Stanley

  • Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency.

    Roger E. Beaty;Scott Barry Kaufman;Mathias Benedek;Rex E. Jung

  • Associative thinking at the core of creativity

    Unknown

  • The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length.

    Yoed N. Kenett;Effi Levi;David Anaki;Miriam Faust

  • "Forward flow": A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity.

    Kurt Gray;Stephen Anderson;Eric Evan Chen;John Michael Kelly

  • What can quantitative measures of semantic distance tell us about creativity

    Yoed N Kenett

  • Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors.

    Alexander Coburn;Alexander Coburn;Oshin Vartanian;Yoed N. Kenett;Marcos Nadal

  • New Perspectives on the Aging Lexicon

    Dirk U. Wulff;Simon De Deyne;Michael N. Jones;Rui Mata

  • Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement.

    Yoed N. Kenett;Roger E. Beaty;Paul J. Silvia;David Anaki

  • When pumpkin is closer to onion than to squash: The structure of the second language lexicon

    Katy Borodkin;Yoed N. Kenett;Miriam Faust;Nira Mashal

  • Semantic organization in children with cochlear implants: computational analysis of verbal fluency

    Yoed N. Kenett;Deena Wechsler-Kashi;Deena Wechsler-Kashi;Dror Y. Kenett;Dror Y. Kenett;Richard G. Schwartz

  • An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability

    Unknown

  • Global and Local Features of Semantic Networks: Evidence from the Hebrew Mental Lexicon

    Yoed N. Kenett;Dror Y. Kenett;Eshel Ben-Jacob;Miriam Faust

  • Brain connectivity–based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure

    Unknown

  • Driving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis.

    Yoed N. Kenett;John D. Medaglia;Roger E. Beaty;Qunlin Chen

  • Network Structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales-Short Forms: Examining Psychometric Network Filtering Approaches

    Alexander P. Christensen;Yoed N. Kenett;Tomaso Aste;Paul J. Silvia

  • Enhanced creative thinking under dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson disease.

    Achinoam Faust-Socher;Yoed N. Kenett;Oren S. Cohen;Sharon Hassin-Baer

  • Rigidity, chaos and integration: hemispheric interaction and individual differences in metaphor comprehension

    Miriam Faust;Yoed N. Kenett

Frequent Co-Authors

Miriam Faust
Miriam Faust Bar-Ilan University
Roger E. Beaty
Roger E. Beaty Pennsylvania State University
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Paul J. Silvia
Paul J. Silvia University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill University of Pennsylvania
Shlomo Havlin
Shlomo Havlin Bar-Ilan University
Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kurt Gray
Kurt Gray University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jiang Qiu
Jiang Qiu Southwest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of in-demand career paths, especially in mental health counseling and therapy. With the growth of online education, students can now pursue accredited programs that lead to professional licensure—offering greater flexibility for working adults and remote learners.

To work as a licensed counselor, requirements vary by state. For example, students interested in North Carolina should review the licensed therapist requirements in Greensboro. In Nevada, the process involves understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Henderson. For those looking beyond the mainland, becoming a licensed therapist in Honolulu presents its own unique educational and testing standards.

If you're considering a market with high demand, it’s important to be aware of the Houston licensed therapist education requirements. Online psychology and counseling degrees are designed to meet these diverse state licensure needs, preparing graduates for rewarding roles within clinical, educational, or community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Yoed N. Kenett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles