World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 99 651 571 413 351 396 38065

Paul J. Silvia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul J. Silvia between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul J. Silvia published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2021. 33 of the 482 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 40 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 39 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 18 publications
1999 2025

482 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul J. Silvia: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 17
2002 4
2003 3
2004 6
2005 8
2006 24
2007 14
2008 16
2009 15
2010 7
2011 20
2012 15
2013 40
2014 32
2015 16
2016 20
2017 39
2018 29
2019 15
2020 29
2021 41
2022 21
2023 15
2024 15
2025 18
Total 482
Download as CSV

Paul J. Silvia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Silvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 396 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 396
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul J. Silvia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Silvia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53 99
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul J. Silvia is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology, with a strong focus on creativity, cognition, and personality. The primary fields of study include Psychology and Neuroscience, with significant contributions to subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main topics of Paul J. Silvia's work cover a range of subjects including:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Humor Studies and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Katherine N. Cotter
  • Rebekah Rodriguez-Boerwinkle
  • Alexander P. Christensen
  • Thomas R. Kwapil
  • Kelly L. Harper

Common venues for publishing research encompass:

  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Creativity Research Journal
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts

Recent publications by Paul J. Silvia include:

  • Looking up at the curious personality: individual differences in curiosity and openness to experience, 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires, 2020, European Journal of Personality (authored by Alexander P. Christensen but included for context)
  • Intelligence and creativity share a common cognitive and neural basis, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General (authored by Emily Frith but included for contextual relevance)
  • Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity, 2021, Personality and Individual Differences (authored by Mathias Benedek but contextual)
  • Keeping Creativity under Control: Contributions of Attention Control and Fluid Intelligence to Divergent Thinking, 2021, Creativity Research Journal (authored by Emily Frith but relevant to the field)

In addition to journal articles, Paul J. Silvia has published a book titled Researching daily life: A guide to experience sampling and daily diary methods. This book was published in 2021 by the American Psychological Association and has accumulated citations evidencing its use in the field.

Best Publications

  • For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life.

    Michael J. Kane;Leslie H. Brown;Jennifer C. McVay;Paul J. Silvia

  • Exploring the Psychology of Interest

    Paul J. Silvia

  • Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods

    Paul J. Silvia;Beate P. Winterstein;John T. Willse;Christopher M. Barona

  • Interest—The Curious Emotion

    Paul J. Silvia

  • Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Paul J. Silvia;Daniel L. Schacter

  • What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest.

    Paul J. Silvia

  • The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Matthew W. Gallagher;Paul J. Silvia;Beate P. Winterstein

  • Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity

    Roger E. Beaty;Yoed N. Kenett;Alexander P. Christensen;Monica D. Rosenberg

  • Default and Executive Network Coupling Supports Creative Idea Production

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Scott Barry Kaufman;Paul J. Silvia

  • Objective Self-Awareness Theory: Recent Progress and Enduring Problems

    Paul J. Silvia;T. Shelley Duval

  • Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion.

    Paul J. Silvia

  • How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing

    Paul J. Silvia

  • Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest.

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Robin W. Wilkins;Emanuel Jauk

  • Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects ☆

    Paul J. Silvia;Emily C. Nusbaum;Christopher Berg;Christopher Martin

  • The Dimensional Structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: Factor Identification and Construct Validity

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Paul J. Silvia

  • The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition

    Roger E. Beaty;Paul J. Silvia;Emily C. Nusbaum;Emanuel Jauk

  • Curiosity and Interest: The Benefits of Thriving on Novelty and Challenge

    Todd B. Kashdan;Paul J. Silvia

  • Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation.

    Paul J. Silvia;Benjamin Wigert;Roni Reiter-Palmon;James C. Kaufman

  • Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias.

    Thomas Shelley Duval;Paul J. Silvia

  • Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions.

    Paul J. Silvia

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Roger E. Beaty
Roger E. Beaty Pennsylvania State University
Neus Barrantes-Vidal
Neus Barrantes-Vidal Autonomous University of Barcelona
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Nathan A. Kimbrel
Nathan A. Kimbrel Duke University
Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Jean C. Beckham
Jean C. Beckham Duke University
James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Christina M. Rodriguez
Christina M. Rodriguez University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens up many diverse career options, including becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Each state sets its own requirements for LPC licensure, so it's important for aspiring counselors to understand the specific pathways in their chosen state.

If you are considering Alabama, you'll need to familiarize yourself with how to get an lpc license in Alabama, which covers required education, supervised experience, and exam criteria. For those planning to practice in Alaska, you should review how to get an lpc license in Alaska to learn about unique state-specific procedures.

In Arizona, the process has its own guidelines as outlined in lpc license requirements in Arizona. Meanwhile, if Arkansas is your target, understanding Arkansas lpc licensure requirements is crucial for successful application.

With the help of online psychology degrees, many students can meet these educational requirements remotely. Be sure to research your intended state's pathway to LPC licensure so your online program aligns with all necessary standards.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Silvia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles