World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maciej Karwowski

Maciej Karwowski

Award Badge
Psychology
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
11500
World Ranking
3733
National Ranking
4

Maciej Karwowski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maciej Karwowski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maciej Karwowski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maciej Karwowski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Maciej Karwowski is affiliated with the University of Wrocław in Poland and has contributed extensively to psychological research, particularly within creativity studies. Their work spans multiple subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

They have a publication record in several frequent venues, such as:

  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Thinking Skills and Creativity
  • The Journal of Creative Behavior
  • Creativity Research Journal
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Their research covers a range of main topics, notably:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Mind wandering and attention

Among recent significant publications authored or co-authored by or including Maciej Karwowski are:

  • Delving into Creativity and Learning, 2020, Creativity Research Journal
  • Who is the Most Stressed During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Data From 26 Countries and Areas, 2020, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration, 2023, The Journal of Creative Behavior
  • Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • The Relationship between Intelligence and Divergent Thinking-A Meta-Analytic Update, 2021, Journal of Intelligence

They frequently collaborate with several scholars, including:

  • Izabela Lebuda
  • Aleksandra Zielińska
  • Piotr Sorokowski
  • Ronald A. Beghetto
  • Dorota M. Jankowska

Maciej Karwowski has also authored books published by Cambridge University Press and Wydawnictwo Liberi Libri eBooks. Their works include:

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity, 2021
  • Creative Agency Unbound, 2025
  • Test of creative imagery abilities, 2020

Best Publications

  • Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis.

    Aleksandra Gajda;Maciej Karwowski;Ronald A. Beghetto

  • Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences.

    Maciej Karwowski

  • Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.

    Piotr Sorokowski;Maciej Karwowski;Michał Misiak;Michalina Konstancja Marczak

  • Big Five Personality Traits as the Predictors of Creative Self‐Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: Does Gender Matter?

    Maciej Karwowski;Izabela Lebuda;Ewa Wisniewska;Jacek Gralewski

  • Who is the Most Stressed During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Data From 26 Countries and Areas.

    Marta Kowal;Tao Coll-Martín;Gözde Ikizer;Jesper Rasmussen

  • Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis

    Maciej Karwowski;Jan Dul;Jacek Gralewski;Emanuel Jauk

  • Mind full of ideas: A meta-analysis of the mindfulness–creativity link

    Izabela Lebuda;Darya L. Zabelina;Maciej Karwowski

  • The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis.

    Maciej Karwowski;Izabela Lebuda

  • Academic achievement of students without special educational needs in inclusive classrooms: A meta-analysis

    Grzegorz Szumski;Joanna Smogorzewska;Maciej Karwowski

  • Did Curiosity Kill the Cat? Relationship Between Trait Curiosity, Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity

    Maciej Karwowski

  • Toward Untangling Creative Self-Beliefs

    Ronald A. Beghetto;Maciej Karwowski

  • It Doesn't Hurt to Ask . . . But Sometimes It Hurts to Believe: Polish Students' Creative Self-Efficacy and Its Predictors

    Maciej Karwowski

  • Creative behavior as agentic action.

    Maciej Karwowski;Ronald A. Beghetto

  • Effects of olfactory training: a meta-analysis.

    A Sorokowska;E Drechsler;M Karwowski;T Hummel

  • How to develop creative imagination? Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC).

    Maciej Karwowski;Marcin Soszynski

  • The Dynamics of Creative Self-Concept: Changes and Reciprocal Relations Between Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity

    Maciej Karwowski

  • Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach

    Aleksandra Gajda;Ronald A. Beghetto;Maciej Karwowski

  • Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration

    Unknown

  • The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity.

    Maciej Karwowski;James C. Kaufman

  • Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity.

    Maciej Karwowski;Izabela Lebuda;Ewa Wiśniewska

  • Creative Self-Beliefs: Their Nature, Development, and Correlates

    Maciej Karwowski;Baptiste Barbot

  • Polite Girls and Creative Boys? Students' Gender Moderates Accuracy of Teachers' Ratings of Creativity

    Jacek Gralewski;Maciej Karwowski

  • Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS).

    Alexander S. McKay;Maciej Karwowski;James C. Kaufman

Frequent Co-Authors

Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Ronald A. Beghetto
Ronald A. Beghetto Arizona State University
James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Katarzyna Pisanski
Katarzyna Pisanski French National Centre for Scientific Research
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Vlad Petre Glaveanu
Vlad Petre Glaveanu University of Bergen
Muhammad Rizwan
Muhammad Rizwan Government College University, Faisalabad
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Konstantinos Kafetsios Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a pathway to a range of diverse and rewarding career options. With increased demand for flexible online programs, many universities now offer affordable online psychology degrees designed to fit different budgets and schedules. For prospective students, cost is a significant factor, leading many to search for cheapest psychology degrees in New York and other budget-friendly options.

Ohio is another state offering a variety of affordable psychology degrees in Ohio that help make education more accessible. In the Midwest and South, students may consider the cheapest psychology degrees in Oklahoma for further options in affordable education.

Localized, city-specific programs can also offer unique opportunities. For instance, those interested in urban settings can look into affordable psychology degrees in Oklahoma City. Earning a psychology degree is a key first step toward roles such as counselors, HR professionals, research assistants, or mental health advocates—making affordability and flexibility crucial for students launching their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Maciej Karwowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles