World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8870 8282 84 82 97 6169

Katarzyna Pisanski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katarzyna Pisanski between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katarzyna Pisanski published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2023. 12 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2023. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katarzyna Pisanski: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 2
2013 3
2014 6
2015 3
2016 12
2017 8
2018 11
2019 9
2020 9
2021 12
2022 8
2023 13
2024 8
2025 11
2026 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

Katarzyna Pisanski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katarzyna Pisanski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katarzyna Pisanski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katarzyna Pisanski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katarzyna Pisanski is affiliated with the French National Centre for Scientific Research in France. Their research portfolio primarily spans the fields of psychology, with significant contributions also in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The specialist areas within these fields prominently include experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental biology, social psychology, ecology, and sociology and political science.

The research topics Pisanski focuses on include animal vocal communication and behavior, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, marine animal studies, infant health and development, attachment and relationship dynamics, language and cultural evolution, and music and audio processing.

Some notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Pisanski are:

  • Form follows function in human nonverbal vocalisations, 2022, Ethology Ecology & Evolution
  • Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication, 2020, Psychological Science
  • Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries, 2020, The Journal of Sex Research

Pisanski has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including David Reby, Piotr Sorokowski, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Mahmoud Boussena, and Hakan Çetınkaya.

Their work has been published repeatedly in certain academic venues, indicating a pattern of engagement within specific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

Best Publications

  • Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

    Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Tomasz Frackowiak

  • Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication

    Kathryn V. Walter;Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao

  • Selfies and personality: Who posts self-portrait photographs?

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Tomasz Frackowiak;Katarzyna Pisanski

  • Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Paul J. Fraccaro;Cara C. Tigue;Jillian J.M. O'Connor

  • Voice Modulation: A Window into the Origins of Human Vocal Control?

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Valentina Cartei;Carolyn McGettigan;Jordan Raine

  • The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners’ assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Drew Rendall

  • Who uses emoticons? Data from 86 702 Facebook users

    Anna Oleszkiewicz;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Maciej Karwowski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Piotr Sorokowski

  • Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Supreet Saluja;Piotr Sorokowski;Tomasz Frąckowiak

  • Cross-Cultural Variation in Mate Preferences for Averageness, Symmetry, Body Size, and Masculinity

    Katarzyna Pisanski;David R. Feinberg

  • Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Maciej Karwowski;Agata Groyecka

  • Voice parameters predict sex-specific body morphology in men and women

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Benedict C. Jones;Bernhard Fink;Jillian J.M. O'Connor

  • Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults

    Anna Oleszkiewicz;Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Kinga Lachowicz-Tabaczek;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • The evolved psychology of voice: evaluating interrelationships in listeners' assessments of the size, masculinity, and attractiveness of unseen speakers

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Sandeep Mishra;Drew Rendall

  • The evolution of voice perception

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Gregory A Bryant

  • Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Justyna Plachetka;Marzena Gmiterek

  • Attractiveness Is Multimodal: Beauty Is Also in the Nose and Ear of the Beholder.

    Agata Groyecka;Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Jan Havlicek

  • Voice of Authority: Professionals Lower Their Vocal Frequencies When Giving Expert Advice

    Piotr Sorokowski;David Puts;Janie Johnson;Olga Żółkiewicz

  • Volitional exaggeration of body size through fundamental and formant frequency modulation in humans.

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Emanuel C. Mora;Emanuel C. Mora;Annette Pisanski;David Reby

  • Return to Oz: voice pitch facilitates assessments of men's body size.

    Katarzyna Pisanski;Paul J Fraccaro;Cara C Tigue;Jillian J M O'Connor

  • Seven and up: individual differences in male voice fundamental frequency emerge before puberty and remain stable throughout adulthood.

    Meddy Fouquet;Katarzyna Pisanski;Nicolas Mathevon;David Reby

Frequent Co-Authors

Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
David R. Feinberg
David R. Feinberg McMaster University
Piotr Sorokowski
Piotr Sorokowski University of Wrocław
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Christin-Melanie Vauclair ISCTE - University Institute of Lisbon
David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair
Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Konstantinos Kafetsios Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Lisa M. DeBruine
Lisa M. DeBruine University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in psychology, it’s important to explore related degrees and pathways such as social work. These fields often intersect, offering flexible career options in mental health, counseling, and community outreach.

Online degrees in social work are increasingly popular for students who need affordability and accessibility. Choosing the right program is crucial—especially when considering cost and local accreditation. For example, students in Ohio can refer to the most affordable social work degree programs in Ohio, while those in Pennsylvania may prefer a list of the most affordable social work degree programs in Pennsylvania.

Urban areas such as Portland and San Antonio also offer options tailored for local needs. Check the most affordable social work degree programs in Portland, or discover affordable social work degrees in San Antonio for additional insights.

Exploring these paths can help future psychologists and social workers find programs that match both their career goals and budget, setting the stage for meaningful work in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Katarzyna Pisanski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles