World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4902
World Ranking
10855
National Ranking
108

Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

    Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • Children's risky play from an evolutionary perspective: The anti-phobic effects of thrilling experiences

    Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication

    Kathryn V. Walter;Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao

  • Metacognitive Therapy for Depression in Adults: A Waiting List Randomized Controlled Trial with Six Months Follow-Up

    Roger Hagen;Odin Hjemdal;Stian Solem;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Supreet Saluja;Piotr Sorokowski;Tomasz Frąckowiak

  • Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model.

    Andrew G. Thomas;Peter K. Jonason;Jesse D. Blackburn;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Jealousy: Evidence of strong sex differences using both forced choice and continuous measure paradigms

    Mons Bendixen;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;David M. Buss

  • Metacognitive therapy versus cognitive–behavioural therapy in adults with generalised anxiety disorder

    Hans Morten Nordahl;Thomas D Borkovec;Roger Hagen;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality

    Asbjørn Dyrendal;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Mons Bendixen

  • Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Maciej Karwowski;Agata Groyecka

  • Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students

    Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Mons Bendixen

  • Worry and Metacognitions as Predictors of Anxiety Symptoms: A Prospective Study.

    Truls Ryum;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Odin Hjemdal;Roger Hagen

  • The effects of non-physical peer sexual harassment on high school students' psychological well-being in Norway: consistent and stable findings across studies.

    Mons Bendixen;Josef Daveronis;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Estrogenic and progestogenic effects of hormonal contraceptives in relation to sexual behavior: insights into extended sexuality

    Trond Viggo Grøntvedt;Nicholas M. Grebe;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Steven W. Gangestad

  • Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use

    Ernst Olav Botnen;Mons Bendixen;Trond Viggo Grøntvedt;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Age preferences in a gender egalitarian society.

    Trond Viggo Grøntvedt;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Why do women regret casual sex more than men do

    Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Joy P. Wyckoff;Kelly Asao;David M. Buss

  • Assortative mating and the evolution of desirability covariation

    Daniel Conroy-Beam;James R. Roney;Aaron W. Lukaszewski;David M. Buss

  • Advances in the understanding of same-sex and opposite-sex sexual harassment

    Mons Bendixen;Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

  • Sexual Regret: Tests of Competing Explanations of Sex Differences

    Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair;Mons Bendixen;David M. Buss

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
Odin Hjemdal
Odin Hjemdal Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Katarzyna Pisanski
Katarzyna Pisanski French National Centre for Scientific Research
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Konstantinos Kafetsios Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Adrian Wells
Adrian Wells University of Manchester
Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Christin-Melanie Vauclair ISCTE - University Institute of Lisbon
Ilona Croy
Ilona Croy Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Piotr Sorokowski
Piotr Sorokowski University of Wrocław

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair

Recently Published Articles