World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Agnieszka Sorokowska

Agnieszka Sorokowska

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7853
World Ranking
8165
National Ranking
8

Agnieszka Sorokowska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Sorokowska sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Agnieszka Sorokowska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnieszka Sorokowska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Agnieszka Sorokowska is affiliated with the University of Wrocław in Poland and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sensory systems, sociology and political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their main topics of research include olfactory and sensory function studies, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, advanced chemical sensor technologies, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, cultural differences and values, and social and intergroup psychology.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Sorokowska are:

  • "Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication," 2020, published in Psychological Science
  • "Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective," 2021, published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Can Information about Pandemics Increase Negative Attitudes toward Foreign Groups? A Case of COVID-19 Outbreak," 2020, published in Sustainability
  • "Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries," 2020, published in The Journal of Sex Research
  • "When in Danger, Turn Right: Does Covid-19 Threat Promote Social Conservatism and Right-Wing Presidential Candidates?" 2020, published in Human Ethology

Frequent co-authors of Sorokowska include:

  • Piotr Sorokowski
  • Anna Oleszkiewicz
  • Tomasz Frąckowiak
  • Marta Kowal
  • Marina Butovskaya

Their research has been published in several venues, with numerous contributions in:

  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Scientific Reports
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Sustainability
  • Human Ethology

Best Publications

  • Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries

    Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Tomasz Frackowiak

  • Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Piotr Sorokowski;Peter Hilpert;Katarzyna Cantarero

  • Sex Differences in Human Olfaction: A Meta-Analysis.

    Piotr Sorokowski;Maciej Karwowski;Michał Misiak;Michalina Konstancja Marczak

  • Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication

    Kathryn V. Walter;Daniel Conroy-Beam;David M. Buss;Kelly Asao

  • Selfies and personality: Who posts self-portrait photographs?

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Tomasz Frackowiak;Katarzyna Pisanski

  • Effects of olfactory training: a meta-analysis.

    A Sorokowska;E Drechsler;M Karwowski;T Hummel

  • Marital Satisfaction, Sex, Age, Marriage Duration, Religion, Number of Children, Economic Status, Education, and Collectivistic Values: Data from 33 Countries

    Piotr Sorokowski;Ashley K. Randall;Agata Groyecka;Tomasz Frackowiak

  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ke Wang;Amit Goldenberg;Charles A. Dorison;Jeremy K. Miller

  • Who uses emoticons? Data from 86 702 Facebook users

    Anna Oleszkiewicz;Anna Oleszkiewicz;Maciej Karwowski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Piotr Sorokowski

  • Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Supreet Saluja;Piotr Sorokowski;Tomasz Frąckowiak

  • Can information about pandemics increase negative attitudes toward foreign groups? A case of COVID-19 outbreak

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agata Groyecka;Marta Kowal;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • Does Personality Smell? Accuracy of Personality Assessments Based on Body Odour

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Piotr Sorokowski;Andrzej Szmajke

  • The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study

    Peter Hilpert;Ashley K. Randall;Piotr Sorokowski;David C. Atkins

  • Polska adaptacja testu Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) – TIPI-PL – wersja standardowa i internetowa

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Aleksandra Słowińska;Anita Zbieg;Piotr Sorokowski

  • Sex differences in color preferences transcend extreme differences in culture and ecology

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Christoph Witzel

  • Universality of the triangular theory of love: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the triangular love scale in 25 countries

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Maciej Karwowski;Agata Groyecka

  • Sex differences in online selfie posting behaviors predict histrionic personality scores among men but not women

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Tomasz Frackowiak;Maciej Karwowski

  • Children and marital satisfaction in a non-Western sample: having more children increases marital satisfaction among the Igbo people of Nigeria

    Ernest I. Onyishi;Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;R. Nathan Pipitone

  • Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults

    Anna Oleszkiewicz;Katarzyna Pisanski;Katarzyna Pisanski;Kinga Lachowicz-Tabaczek;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska

  • Variable Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism in Stature (SDS) Might Not Be Universal: Data From a Semi-Nomad Population (Himba) in Namibia

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Bernhardt Fink;Mara Mberira

  • When in Danger, Turn Right: Does Covid-19 Threat Promote Social Conservatism and Right-Wing Presidential Candidates?

    Maciej Karwowski;Marta Kowal;Agata Groyecka;Michał Białek

  • Aging Perceptions in Tsimane’ Amazonian Forager–Farmers Compared With Two Industrialized Societies

    Piotr Sorokowski;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Agnieszka Sorokowska;Tomasz Frackowiak;Corinna E. Löckenhoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr Sorokowski
Piotr Sorokowski University of Wrocław
Katarzyna Pisanski
Katarzyna Pisanski French National Centre for Scientific Research
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Maciej Karwowski
Maciej Karwowski University of Wrocław
Ilona Croy
Ilona Croy Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Anu Realo
Anu Realo University of Warwick
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Konstantinos Kafetsios Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Daniel David
Daniel David Babeș-Bolyai University
Maryanne L. Fisher
Maryanne L. Fisher Saint Mary's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens a variety of online options and career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Many states offer unique requirements for licensure, which is crucial if you plan to practice professionally. For instance, students considering working in Kentucky should review the Kentucky lpc licensure requirements to understand the necessary education, supervision, and examination steps.

Likewise, those looking at opportunities in Louisiana should be aware of the Louisiana licensed professional counselor requirements. Each state’s pathway can differ in terms of clinical hours, coursework, and assessment needs. For prospective students in Maine, it’s important to become familiar with the lpc license requirements in Maine, which outline specific details about supervised practice and academic credentials.

Residents of Maryland should consult the Maryland lpc licensure requirements when planning their educational journey. Understanding these state-specific guidelines helps ensure your chosen degree not only meets your career goals, but also aligns with licensing prerequisites. Exploring accredited online psychology programs can be a flexible and strategic first step toward a rewarding career in professional counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Agnieszka Sorokowska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles