World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2084 1893 1 1 431 16800

Daniel David publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel David between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel David published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 16.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2013. 28 of the 490 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2013. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 2 publications
1998 2026

490 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel David: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 6
2003 9
2004 8
2005 6
2006 15
2007 19
2008 11
2009 19
2010 27
2011 18
2012 28
2013 37
2014 28
2015 31
2016 20
2017 28
2018 34
2019 26
2020 22
2021 11
2022 18
2023 18
2024 15
2025 26
2026 2
Total 490
Download as CSV

Daniel David publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel David sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 431–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 431 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41 431
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel David D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel David sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel David is affiliated with Babeș-Bolyai University in Romania and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a primary focus on clinical, experimental, and cognitive psychology.

Their research spans multiple topics, including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

David's recent works demonstrate a focus on mental health interventions and assessment tools. Notable recent publications include:

  • "How Effective are Serious Games for Promoting Mental Health and Health Behavioral Change in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," 2020, published in Child & Youth Care Forum
  • "Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis," 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Predictors of Anxiety in the COVID-19 Pandemic from a Global Perspective: Data from 23 Countries," 2021, Sustainability
  • "Global Perspective on Marital Satisfaction," 2020, Sustainability
  • "The effectiveness of a virtual reality attention task to predict depression and anxiety in comparison with current clinical measures," 2021, Virtual Reality

Their body of work appears frequently in specific academic journals, primarily including:

  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
  • Sustainability
  • Children
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Children and Youth Services Review

Daniel David collaborates regularly with several scholars, having the most frequent co-authorships with:

  • Liviu A. Fodor
  • Cristina Tomoiagă
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Ioana Alexandra Iuga
  • Ronny Bruffaerts

The scientist's work is distributed predominantly across the main field of psychology, with significant contributions to the subfields of clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, education, and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV-1 infection : a case control study

    Daniel D. Murray;Kazuo Suzuki;Matthew Law;Jonel Trebicka

  • Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta-analysis.

    David Opriş;Sebastian Pintea;Azucena García-Palacios;Cristina Botella

  • Why Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Is the Current Gold Standard of Psychotherapy.

    Daniel David;Ioana Cristea;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison

    Agnieszka Sorokowska;Piotr Sorokowski;Peter Hilpert;Katarzyna Cantarero

  • Clinical Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Procedures: An Updated Meta‐Analysis

    Cristina Mogoaşe;Daniel David;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Daniel David;Gary Winkel;Jeffrey H. Silverstein

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Brief Hypnosis Intervention to Control Side Effects in Breast Surgery Patients

    Guy H. Montgomery;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Julie B. Schnur;Daniel David

  • Rational and Irrational Beliefs: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice

    Daniel David;Steven Jay Lynn;Albert Ellis

  • Children with Autism Social Engagement in Interaction with Nao, an Imitative Robot - A Series of Single Case Experiments

    Adriana Tapus;Andreea Peca;Amir Aly;Cristina A. Pop

  • The effectiveness of virtual reality based interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis.

    Liviu A. Fodor;Carmen D. Coteț;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Ștefan Szamoskozi

  • Another search for the hot cognitions: Appraisal, irrational beliefs, attributions, and their relation to emotion

    Daniel David;Julie Schnur;Alexandra Belloiu

  • Irrational Beliefs and Psychological Distress: A Meta-Analysis

    Andreea Vîslă;Christoph Flückiger;Martin grosse Holtforth;Martin grosse Holtforth;Daniel David;Daniel David

  • Rational emotive behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, and medication in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial, posttreatment outcomes, and six …

    Unknown

  • Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD

    Bram Vanderborght;Ramona Simut;Jelle Saldien;Cristina Pop

  • A Synopsis of Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT); Fundamental and Applied Research

    Daniel David;Aurora Szentagotai;Kallay Eva;Bianca Macavei

  • A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment

    Mark Coeckelbergh;Cristina Pop;Ramona Simut;Andreea Peca

  • Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Liviu A Fodor;Raluca Georgescu;Pim Cuijpers;Ştefan Szamoskozi

  • Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

    Erica S. Weitz;Steven D. Hollon;Jos Twisk;Annemieke van Straten

  • Cognitions in cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies; toward an integrative model.

    Daniel David;Daniel David;Aurora Szentagotai

  • Tratat de psihoterapii cognitive și comportamentale. Ed. II

    Unknown

  • Anxiety: There is an app for that. A systematic review of anxiety apps

    Madalina Sucala;Madalina Sucala;Pim Cuijpers;Frederick Muench;Roxana Cardoș

  • Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions

    Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp;Daniel David;Daniel David;Tom Beckers;Peter Muris

Frequent Co-Authors

Ioana A. Cristea
Ioana A. Cristea University of Pavia
Guy H. Montgomery
Guy H. Montgomery Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Bram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dana H. Bovbjerg
Dana H. Bovbjerg University of Pittsburgh
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Anu Realo
Anu Realo University of Warwick
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Raymond DiGiuseppe
Raymond DiGiuseppe St. John's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online degrees and flexible career options, particularly in social work and related fields. Online programs are increasingly popular for students who need flexibility and affordability while preparing for roles in counseling, healthcare, education, and community services.

If you're looking for cost-effective options, consider exploring some of the affordable social work programs in Marion, as well as the affordable social work degrees in Maryland. These programs provide solid academic foundations and practical experience while keeping tuition manageable.

Midwestern students can also benefit from the cheapest social work degrees in Michigan, offering accessible education in a key growth sector. For those in metropolitan areas, the most affordable social work degree programs in Minneapolis are excellent for those seeking urban learning environments.

Whether your passion is clinical therapy, advocacy, or research, online degrees in psychology and social work can equip you for varied and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel David

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles