World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1665 1494 984 863 371 19295

Steven Jay Lynn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven Jay Lynn between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven Jay Lynn published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2010. 22 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2010. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 12 publications
1978 2025

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven Jay Lynn: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 0
1980 1
1981 3
1982 0
1983 1
1984 5
1985 4
1986 6
1987 10
1988 5
1989 5
1990 7
1991 10
1992 4
1993 9
1994 7
1995 7
1996 11
1997 10
1998 10
1999 9
2000 11
2001 8
2002 8
2003 9
2004 8
2005 7
2006 16
2007 8
2008 16
2009 22
2010 24
2011 4
2012 6
2013 13
2014 8
2015 16
2016 8
2017 15
2018 8
2019 11
2020 11
2021 12
2022 9
2023 17
2024 10
2025 12
Total 423
Download as CSV

Steven Jay Lynn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Jay Lynn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 371–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 371 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63 371
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven Jay Lynn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Jay Lynn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Steven Jay Lynn is affiliated with Binghamton University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

Their research covers a range of topics such as psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, pain management and the placebo effect, traumatic brain injury research, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, identity, memory, therapy, memory processes, influences, mental health, and psychiatry.

Recent publications by Steven Jay Lynn include:

  • "Dissociation and Dissociative Disorders Reconsidered: Beyond Sociocognitive and Trauma Models Toward a Transtheoretical Framework," 2022, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • "Myths and misconceptions about hypnosis and suggestion: Separating fact and fiction," 2020, Applied Cognitive Psychology

Frequent co-authors in Lynn's research include:

  • Craig P. Polizzi
  • Fiona G. Sleight
  • Henry Otgaar
  • Damla Aksen
  • Charlie W. McDonald

Lynn's work is often published in venues such as:

  • Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Imagination Cognition and Personality
  • Consciousness and Cognition
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

In addition to journal articles, Lynn has published books with Harvard University Press. Notable titles include "Dreaming Reality," with editions published in 2024 and 2025.

Lynn has been recognized by the American Psychological Association as a Fellow since 2013.

Best Publications

  • Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence

    Etzel Cardeña;Steven Jay Lynn;Stanley Krippner

  • Fantasy proneness. Hypnosis, developmental antecedents, and psychopathology.

    Steven J. Lynn;Judith W. Rhue

  • Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies☆

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Stress and coping in the time of COVID-19: Pathways to resilience and recovery

    Craig Polizzi;Steven Jay Lynn;Andrew Perry

  • Altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape.

    Irving Kirsch;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Rational and Irrational Beliefs: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice

    Daniel David;Steven Jay Lynn;Albert Ellis

  • Cognitive processes in dissociation: An analysis of core theoretical assumptions

    Timo Giesbrecht;Steven Jay Lynn;Scott O. Lilienfeld;Harald Merckelbach

  • The fantasy-prone person: hypnosis, imagination, and creativity.

    Steven J. Lynn;Judith W. Rhue

  • Electroencephalographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Vincent J. Monastra;Steven Lynn;Michael Linden;Joel F. Lubar

  • Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: situational factors and posttraumatic stress.

    Melissa J. Layman;Christine A. Gidycz;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives.

    Steven Jay Lynn;Judith W. Rhue

  • The role of cognition in classical and operant conditioning

    Irving Kirsch;Steven Jay Lynn;Michael Vigorito;Ralph R. Miller

  • Dissociative identity disorder and the sociocognitive model: recalling the lessons of the past.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Irving Kirsch;Theodore R. Sarbin;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Automaticity in Clinical Psychology

    Irving Kirsch;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Theories of hypnosis : current models and perspectives

    Steven Jay Lynn;Judith W. Rhue

  • Why Ineffective Psychotherapies Appear to Work: A Taxonomy of Causes of Spurious Therapeutic Effectiveness

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Lorie A. Ritschel;Steven Jay Lynn;Robin L. Cautin

  • Dissociation theories of hypnosis.

    Irving Kirsch;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Steven Jay Lynn;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Hypnosis as an empirically supported clinical intervention: the state of the evidence and a look to the future.

    Steven Jay Lynn;Irving Kirsch;Arreed Barabasz;Etzel Cardeña

  • ACCEPTANCE: AN HISTORICAL AND CONCEPTUAL REVIEW

    John C. Williams;Steven Jay Lynn

  • Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis

    Judith W. Rhue;Steven Jay Lynn;Irving Kirsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University
Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Daniel David
Daniel David Babeș-Bolyai University
Etzel Cardeña
Etzel Cardeña Lund University
Guy H. Montgomery
Guy H. Montgomery Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Michael N. Hallquist
Michael N. Hallquist Pennsylvania State University
Elizabeth F. Loftus
Elizabeth F. Loftus University of California, Irvine
Robert D. Latzman
Robert D. Latzman Georgia State University
John Ruscio
John Ruscio College of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens a variety of online learning and career options. Many students pursue fields like counseling, therapy, or research. Another popular choice is social work, a career closely aligned with psychology and focused on helping individuals and communities.

If you’re interested in this path, it’s essential to understand regional professional requirements and educational opportunities. For instance, if you’re wondering how to become a social worker in Connecticut, you'll need at least a bachelor’s degree and must meet certain licensing criteria. Each state has its own regulations—be sure to check the requirements to be a social worker in Delaware as they may differ from those in other states.

In Florida, there is a focus on clinical social work credentials, so be prepared for additional training if you’re considering becoming a social worker in Florida. For aspiring professionals in the Southeast, Georgia social work education requirements include both accredited coursework and supervised experience.

No matter the state, a psychology background provides a strong foundation for advancing into diverse, in-demand fields through online degree options and flexible career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Jay Lynn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles