World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
13235
World Ranking
3834
National Ranking
1819

Alexander Borgida publications per year

1976: 1 publications 1977: 1 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 50 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publications
1976 2024

219 publications in total across all disciplines

Alexander Borgida publication distribution in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Borgida sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 218 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alexander Borgida D-index placement in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Borgida sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Borgida is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Management Information Systems, and Information Systems and Management.

Their work encompasses a range of topics, notably:

  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Topic Modeling
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Software Engineering Research

Alexander Borgida has contributed to several publications in notable venues, including:

  • Requirements Engineering
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among their recent papers are:

  • "A retrospective on Telos as a metamodeling language for requirements engineering," published in 2020 in Requirements Engineering
  • "CaRE: a refinement calculus for requirements engineering based on argumentation theory," published in 2021 in Software & Systems Modeling
  • "Supporting Human Memory by Reconstructing Personal Episodic Narratives from Digital Traces," published in 2022 in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Supporting Human Memory by Reconstructing Personal Episodic Narratives from Digital Traces," published in 2020 on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators in Alexander Borgida's research include:

  • John Mylopoulos
  • Yehia Elrakaiby
  • Alessio Ferrari
  • Varvara Kalokyri
  • Amélie Marian

Best Publications

  • Telos: representing knowledge about information systems

    John Mylopoulos;Alex Borgida;Matthias Jarke;Manolis Koubarakis

  • CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects

    Alexander Borgida;Ronald J. Brachman;Deborah L. McGuinness;Lori Alperin Resnick

  • LIVING WITH CLASSIC: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language

    Ronald J. Brachman;Deborah L. McGuinness;Peter F. Patel-Schneider;Lori Alperin Resnick

  • Efficient management of transitive relationships in large data and knowledge bases

    R. Agrawal;A. Borgida;H. V. Jagadish

  • On the relative expressiveness of description logics and predicate logics

    Alex Borgida

  • Distributed Description Logics: Assimilating Information from Peer Sources.

    Alexander Borgida;Luciano Serafini

  • Description logics in data management

    A. Borgida

  • A semantics and complete algorithm for subsumption in the classic description logic

    Alex Borgida;Peter F. Patel-Schneider

  • Language features for flexible handling of exceptions in information systems

    Alexander Borgida

  • Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications

    Alexander T. Borgida;Vinay K. Chaudhri;Paolo Giorgini;Eric S. Yu

  • On formal requirements modeling languages: RML revisited

    Sol Greenspan;John Mylopoulos;Alex Borgida

  • On the frame problem in procedure specifications

    A. Borgida;J. Mylopoulos;R. Reiter

  • Computing least common subsumers in description logics

    William W. Cohen;Alex Borgida;Haym Hirsh

  • Generalization/Specialization as a Basis for Software Specification

    Alexander Borgida;Alexander Borgida;John Mylopoulos;Harry K. T. Wong;Harry K. T. Wong

  • Interactive data analysis employing a knowledge base

    Alexander Tiberiu Borgida;Ronald Jay Brachman;Thomas Kirk;Peter Gilman Selfridge

  • Strategic business modeling: representation and reasoning

    Jennifer Horkoff;Daniele Barone;Lei Jiang;Eric Yu

  • Explaining subsumption in description logics

    Deborah L. McGuinness;Alexander T. Borgida

  • Capturing more world knowledge in the requirements specification

    Sol J. Greenspan;John Mylopoulos;Alex Borgida

  • Techne: Towards a New Generation of Requirements Modeling Languages with Goals, Preferences, and Inconsistency Handling

    Ivan J. Jureta;Alex Borgida;Neil A. Ernst;John Mylopoulos

  • INTEGRATED SUPPORT FOR DATA ARCHAEOLOGY

    Ronald J. Brachman;Peter G. Selfridge;Loren G. Terveen;Boris Altman

  • Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications: Essays in Honor of John Mylopoulos

    Alexander T. Borgida;Vinay K. Chaudhri;Paolo Giorgini;Eric S. Yu

  • Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems

    Alexander Borgida

Frequent Co-Authors

John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Deborah L. McGuinness
Deborah L. McGuinness Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center
Luciano Serafini
Luciano Serafini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Lin Liu
Lin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Loren Terveen
Loren Terveen University of Minnesota
Eric Yu
Eric Yu University of Toronto
Giancarlo Guizzardi
Giancarlo Guizzardi University of Twente
Ralf Küsters
Ralf Küsters University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees, tailored to different stages of your educational journey. For those seeking flexibility and value, there are cheap masters programs available online that blend high-quality education with affordability, making a graduate degree more accessible than ever.

If you are aiming for leadership roles or academic research, consider advancing with an online phd leadership program. These options prepare graduates for senior management and academic opportunities while allowing for remote study.

Entry-level learners can start their journey with easy online associate degrees in technology or related fields, making it simple to gain foundational skills and credentials quickly. For educators and aspiring academic leaders, cheap online edd programs offer an affordable route to advanced positions in education.

Each of these online degree pathways aligns with diverse career goals and schedules, helping you advance in Computer Science or related fields while keeping costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Borgida

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles