What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
Marta Riutort mainly investigates Zoology, Evolutionary biology, Xenacoelomorpha, Acoelomorpha and Acoela.
Her research in Zoology intersects with topics in Phylogenetics, Clade and Molecular phylogenetics.
Her Evolutionary biology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Phylogenetic tree, Lophotrochozoa, Monophyly, Tricladida and Ecdysozoa.
Her Tricladida study which covers Ribosomal DNA that intersects with Turbellaria.
In her study, Catenulida, Polyphyly and Paleontology is inextricably linked to Helminth genetics, which falls within the broad field of Xenacoelomorpha.
As a part of the same scientific family, Marta Riutort mostly works in the field of Acoelomorpha, focusing on Xenoturbella and, on occasion, Anatomy and Flatworm.
Her most cited work include:
- First molecular evidence for the existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. (414 citations)
- Acoel flatworms : Earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes (358 citations)
- Are the Platyhelminthes a monophyletic primitive group? An assessment using 18S rDNA sequences. (192 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Marta Riutort mainly focuses on Tricladida, Zoology, Evolutionary biology, Ecology and Phylogenetic tree.
The concepts of her Tricladida study are interwoven with issues in Dugesiidae, Dugesia and Taxonomy.
Her studies in Zoology integrate themes in fields like Phylogenetics, Molecular phylogenetics and Species diversity.
She combines subjects such as Sister group, Paleontology, Species complex, Monophyly and Bilateria with her study of Evolutionary biology.
While the research belongs to areas of Bilateria, Marta Riutort spends her time largely on the problem of Acoela, intersecting her research to questions surrounding Clade, Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa.
Marta Riutort has included themes like Taxon and Genome in her Phylogenetic tree study.
She most often published in these fields:
- Tricladida (52.33%)
- Zoology (47.67%)
- Evolutionary biology (30.23%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Tricladida (52.33%)
- Evolutionary biology (30.23%)
- Zoology (47.67%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of investigation include Tricladida, Evolutionary biology, Zoology, Phylogenetic tree and Taxonomy.
Her work carried out in the field of Tricladida brings together such families of science as Dugesia and Molecular phylogenetics.
Her Evolutionary biology study combines topics in areas such as Taxonomic rank, Epigenetics, Species complex and Monophyly.
Her biological study focuses on Genus.
Her study in Phylogenetic tree is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Phylogenetics and Comparative genomics.
Her Phylogenetics research includes elements of Genome and Genomics.
Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics. (34 citations)
- Planarian Diversity and Phylogeny. (14 citations)
- Cryptic species delineation in freshwater planarians of the genus Dugesia (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida): Extreme intraindividual genetic diversity, morphological stasis, and karyological variability. (9 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Evolutionary biology, Tricladida, Taxonomy, Phylogenetic tree and Species complex.
Her Evolutionary biology research integrates issues from Dugesia and Genetic diversity.
Her Tricladida research is under the purview of Zoology.
Her research in Taxonomy intersects with topics in Dugesiidae and Flatworm.
Her research integrates issues of Phylogenetics, Comparative genomics, Genome and Type species in her study of Phylogenetic tree.
Subgenus, Monophyly, Paraphyly and Entomobryidae is closely connected to Systematics in her research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Species complex.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
