World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
11058
World Ranking
4982
National Ranking
2735

Glenn J. Larrabee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn J. Larrabee sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Glenn J. Larrabee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn J. Larrabee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Glenn J. Larrabee is affiliated with the Veterans Health Administration in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on epidemiology, applied psychology, statistics, probability and uncertainty, family practice, and social psychology.

The main topics of their work include traumatic brain injury research, psychological testing and assessment, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, counseling practices and supervision, psychometric methodologies and testing, reliability and agreement in measurement, and cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Larrabee include Martin L. Rohling, Jerry J. Sweet, Joel E. Morgan, Kyle B. Boone, and Michael W. Kirkwood.

Publications by Glenn J. Larrabee are most often found in the journal The Clinical Neuropsychologist, with five papers published there, alongside one publication in Oxford University Press eBooks.

Recent papers include:

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering (2021, The Clinical Neuropsychologist)
  • Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security (2022, The Clinical Neuropsychologist)
  • Forced choice test score of p ≤.20 and failures on ≥ six performance validity tests results in similar Overall Test Battery Means (2023, The Clinical Neuropsychologist)
  • The rate of psychiatric disorders in veterans undergoing intensive EEG monitoring is associated with symptom and performance invalidity (2021, The Clinical Neuropsychologist)
  • Collinearity, tetrachoric correlation, and criterion group assignment of examinees failing only one performance validity test (PVT): Testing Leonhard's (2023) PVT critique (2025, The Clinical Neuropsychologist)

In 2011, Glenn J. Larrabee was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • A review of mild head trauma. part I: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies

    Laurence M. Binder;Martin L. Rohling;Glenn J. Larrabee

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

    Robert L Heilbronner;Jerry J Sweet;Joel E Morgan;Glenn J Larrabee

  • Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests.

    Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Assessment of memory complaint in age-associated memory impairment: the MAC-Q.

    Thomas H. Crook;Edward P. Feher;Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Wechsler Memory Scale III

    Arthur MacNeill Horton;Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios.

    Glenn J. Larrabee

  • A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Re-analyses and Reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009)

    Martin L Rohling;Laurence M Binder;George J Demakis;Glenn J Larrabee

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

    Jerry J Sweet;Robert L Heilbronner;Joel E Morgan;Glenn J Larrabee

  • False-Positive Rates Associated with the Use of Multiple Performance and Symptom Validity Tests

    Glenn J Larrabee

  • Estimated Prevalence of Age-Associated Memory Impairment Derived From Standardized Tests of Memory Function

    Glenn J. Larrabee;Thomas H. Crook

  • Factors Attenuating the Validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale in a Dementia Population

    Edward P. Feher;Glenn J. Larrabee;Thomas H. Crook

  • A self-rating scale for evaluating memory in everyday life

    Thomas H. Crook;Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Somatic Malingering on the MMPI and MMPI-2 in Personal Injury Litigants

    Glenn J. Larrabee

  • Effort Indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II)

    Penny L. Wolfe;Scott R. Millis;Robin Hanks;Norman Fichtenberg

  • Memory self-ratings and objective test performance in a normal elderly sample

    Glenn J. Larrabee;Harvey S. Levin

  • 40 PLUS OR MINUS 10, A NEW MAGICAL NUMBER: REPLY TO RUSSELL

    Glenn J. Larrabee;Scott R. Millis;John E. Meyers

  • Construct validity of various memory testing procedures.

    Glenn J. Larrabee;Robert L. Kane;John R. Schuck;David J. Francis

  • Exaggerated MMPI-2 symptom report in personal injury litigants with malingered neurocognitive deficit

    Glenn J Larrabee

  • Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests

    Glenn J. Larrabee;Glenn Curtiss

  • Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change.

    M. D. Chafetz;M. A. Williams;Y. S. Ben-Porath;K. J. Bianchini

  • A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Re-analyses and Reconsiderations

    Martin L. Rohling;Laurence M. Binder;George J. Demakis;Glenn J. Larrabee

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas H. Crook
Thomas H. Crook National Institutes of Health
Scott R. Millis
Scott R. Millis Wayne State University
Laurence M. Binder
Laurence M. Binder Oregon Health & Science University
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Glenn Curtiss
Glenn Curtiss University of South Florida
David Faust
David Faust University of Rhode Island
Kyle Brauer Boone
Kyle Brauer Boone Alliant International University
Jerry J. Sweet
Jerry J. Sweet NorthShore University HealthSystem
Kevin J. Bianchini
Kevin J. Bianchini University of New Orleans
Jeffrey T. Barth
Jeffrey T. Barth University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open many doors, including rewarding paths like becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Many professionals start with an online psychology degree and then pursue specialized training. To practice as an MFT, requirements vary by location, so it’s important to understand the specific steps needed for licensure.

For those in Arizona, you can discover Phoenix mft education requirements to learn about educational pathways and state-specific licensing guidelines. If you’re interested in Pennsylvania, read about how to become an mft in Pittsburgh for a closer look at local prerequisites.

The journey can differ elsewhere, too. In Texas, you’ll find steps outlined on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Plano. Meanwhile, aspiring therapists in Florida might explore how to become an mft in Port St. Lucie to understand their local process.

Online psychology degree programs can provide flexibility as you work towards these credentials. Whichever path you choose, familiarize yourself with state regulations, supervised experience requirements, and licensure exams to advance your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn J. Larrabee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles