World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2523 2309 1460 1306 192 13382

Scott R. Millis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott R. Millis between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott R. Millis published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 10 of the 248 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

248 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott R. Millis: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 9
1995 6
1996 8
1997 7
1998 7
1999 6
2000 6
2001 9
2002 11
2003 13
2004 7
2005 6
2006 5
2007 8
2008 9
2009 11
2010 6
2011 6
2012 12
2013 16
2014 10
2015 8
2016 8
2017 15
2018 8
2019 3
2020 2
2021 6
2022 2
2023 5
2024 4
2025 6
Total 248
Download as CSV

Scott R. Millis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Millis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott R. Millis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Millis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Scott R. Millis is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on several subfields including psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and epidemiology.

Their research addresses core topics such as epilepsy research and treatment, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, traumatic brain injury research, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, along with menopause-related health impacts and treatments.

Recent scholarly works include the following publications:

  • Superior Verbal Memory Outcome After Stereotactic Laser Amygdalohippocampotomy, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Factors Associated with Refractory Status Epilepticus Termination Following Ketamine Initiation: A Multivariable Analysis Model, 2022, Neurocritical Care
  • Lacosamide serum concentrations during pregnancy, 2021, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis, 2020, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
  • Role of white matter in cognitive impairment among relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients, 2023, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Mills has frequently collaborated with co-authors including Deepti Zutshi, Rohit Marawar, Maysaa Basha, Robin A. Hanks, and Daniel L. Drane. These collaborations have contributed to advancing research in neurology and related fields.

Common venues for Millis's publications include Epilepsy & Behavior, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Neurology, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Frontiers in Neurology, emphasizing a strong presence in neurology and neuropsychology-focused journals.

Their contributions to the academic and clinical community were recognized with the award of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

    Robert L Heilbronner;Jerry J Sweet;Joel E Morgan;Glenn J Larrabee

  • Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury.

    Scott R. Millis;Mitchell Rosenthal;Thomas A. Novack;Mark Sherer

  • Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research

    Elisabeth A. Wilde;Gale Gibson Whiteneck;Jennifer A. Bogner;Tamara Bushnik

  • Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.

    Steven Kirshblum;Steven Kirshblum;Scott Millis;William McKinley;David Tulsky

  • Better object recognition and naming outcome with MRI-guided stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Daniel L. Drane;Daniel L. Drane;David W. Loring;Natalie L. Voets;Michele Price

  • Neuropsychologic and Functional Outcome After Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Shauna Kashluba;Shauna Kashluba;Shauna Kashluba;Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Joseph E. Casey;Scott R. Millis

  • Global White Matter Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Images Is Predictive of Injury Severity in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Randall R. Benson;Shashwath A. Meda;Sriram Vasudevan;Zhifeng Kou

  • Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample.

    Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Lisa J. Rapport;Scott R. Millis;Sonali A. Deshpande

  • Gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

    Qing Tai Md;Steven Kirshblum;Boqing Chen Md;Scott Millis

  • The California Verbal Learning Test in the Detection of Incomplete Effort in Neuropsychological Evaluation.

    Scott R. Millis;Steven H. Putnam;Steven H. Putnam;Kenneth M. Adams;Joseph H. Ricker;Joseph H. Ricker

  • The recognition memory test in the detection of malingered and exaggerated memory deficits

    Scott R. Millis

  • Relationship between Glasgow Coma Scale and functional outcome

    Ross D. Zafonte;Flora M. Hammond;Nancy R. Mann;Deborah L. Wood

  • Detecting Incomplete Effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition

    Bradley N Axelrod;Norman L Fichtenberg;Scott R Millis;Jeffrey C Wertheimer

  • Concussion symptom inventory: an empirically derived scale for monitoring resolution of symptoms following sport-related concussion.

    Christopher Randolph;Scott R. Millis;William B. Barr;Michael McCrea;Michael McCrea

  • Development of the Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools–Objective for Use After Traumatic Brain Injury

    Gale G Whiteneck;Marcel P. J. M. Dijkers;Allen W Heinemann;Allen W Heinemann;Jennifer A Bogner

  • Is learning and memory different in a virtual environment

    Robert J Matheis;Maria T Schultheis;Lana A Tiersky;John DeLuca

  • The Relationship between Depression and Cognition in Older Adults: A Cross-validation Study

    Peter A. Lichtenberg;Thomas Ross;Scott R. Millis;Carol A. Manning

  • The Reliability and Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory−18 in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

    Sarah Jane Meachen;Sarah Jane Meachen;Robin A. Hanks;Robin A. Hanks;Scott R. Millis;Scott R. Millis;Lisa J. Rapport

  • Executive functioning and predictors of falls in the rehabilitation setting

    Lisa J. Rapport;Robin A. Hanks;Scott R. Millis;Sonali A. Deshpande

  • Predictors of driving outcome after traumatic brain injury

    Robert David Coleman;Lisa J. Rapport;Tanya C. Ergh;Robin A. Hanks

  • Validation of the Warrington Theory of Visual Processing and the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery

    Lisa J. Rapport;Scott R. Millis;Patricia J. Bonello

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Lisa J. Rapport
Lisa J. Rapport Wayne State University
Ross Zafonte
Ross Zafonte Harvard Medical School
Bradley N. Axelrod
Bradley N. Axelrod United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Thomas A. Novack
Thomas A. Novack University of Alabama at Birmingham
Glenn J. Larrabee
Glenn J. Larrabee Veterans Health Administration
James F. Malec
James F. Malec Indiana University
Daniel L. Drane
Daniel L. Drane Emory University
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Noah D. Silverberg
Noah D. Silverberg University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open various career opportunities, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students opt for online degree programs for flexibility and broader access to reputable universities across the United States.

If you’re considering a career in social work, it’s essential to understand each state’s educational requirements and licensing processes. For example, aspiring social workers should review the California social work license requirements as well as the Colorado social work license requirements before applying to programs.

Educational requirements and state laws can differ significantly. You might also want to understand the Connecticut social work education requirements or review the requirements to be a social worker in Delaware for further insight. Whichever path you choose, online degrees can help you meet prerequisites for licensure and start a fulfilling career in the field of psychology and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Millis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles