World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ann Melissa Campbell

Ann Melissa Campbell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 34 9155 8810 2567 2372 81 6248

Ann Melissa Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann Melissa Campbell between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann Melissa Campbell published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2021. 8 of the 92 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2021. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1957 2025

92 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann Melissa Campbell: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 3
2008 7
2009 3
2010 0
2011 5
2012 1
2013 2
2014 4
2015 2
2016 3
2017 5
2018 3
2019 5
2020 4
2021 11
2022 3
2023 6
2024 3
2025 5
Total 92
Download as CSV

Ann Melissa Campbell publications per year - data summary

  • Ann Melissa Campbell, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Iowa, has 92 publications recorded across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1957 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1957, 1981, 1999, 2001 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 43 of the 69 years in the span carry no publications at all (1958, 1959, 1960, 1961 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 1.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.5 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 28 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1957-1979: 1 publication (0.0 per year); 1980-2002: 5 publications (0.2 per year); 2003-2025: 86 publications (3.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ann Melissa Campbell publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Melissa Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 81 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190 81
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann Melissa Campbell publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 38–47 to 804+ publications.
  • Ann Melissa Campbell, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Iowa, records 81 publications - the 4th percentile of the discipline.
  • 4% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Ann Melissa Campbell, and about 96% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 198–207 publications range, and Ann Melissa Campbell ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 148–157 publications, holding 457 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 61% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 228–237 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 804 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Ann Melissa Campbell D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Melissa Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200 34
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Ann Melissa Campbell D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,796 Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 78 ranges running from 30 to 107+ D-Index.
  • Ann Melissa Campbell, a Engineering and Technology scholar from University of Iowa, records 34 D-Index - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Engineering and Technology scientists score the same or lower than Ann Melissa Campbell, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 47 D-Index range, and Ann Melissa Campbell ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 426 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Ann Melissa Campbell is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has a professional focus primarily in the field of Engineering. Their research spans several subfields including Building and Construction, Automotive Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Transportation, and Marketing.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Urban and Freight Transport Logistics, Smart Parking Systems Research, Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods, Transportation Planning and Optimization, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, and Facility Location and Emergency Management.

Recent publications include the following works:

  • The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem: Dynamic Pickup and Delivery with Deadlines and Random Ready Times (2020), published in Transportation Science
  • Assessment of transportation system disruption and accessibility to critical amenities during flooding: Iowa case study (2021), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • The Value of Autonomous Vehicles for Last-Mile Deliveries in Urban Environments (2021), published in Management Science
  • A two-tier urban delivery network with robot-based deliveries (2021), published in Networks
  • Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Assisted Last-Mile Delivery in Urban to Rural Settings (2022), published in Transportation Science

Ann Melissa Campbell frequently collaborates with several researchers, notably:

  • Jan Fabian Ehmke
  • Barrett W. Thomas
  • Sara M. Reed
  • Iurii Bakach
  • İbrahim Demir

Their work appears regularly in several academic journals and publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transportation Science
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Networks
  • Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review

Best Publications

  • Routing for Relief Efforts

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Dieter Vandenbussche;William Hermann

  • A Decomposition Approach for the Inventory-Routing Problem

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Martin W. P. Savelsbergh

  • The Inventory Routing Problem

    Ann Campbell;Lloyd Clarke;Anton Kleywegt;Martin Savelsbergh

  • Efficient Insertion Heuristics for Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problems

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Martin Savelsbergh

  • Time Slot Management in Attended Home Delivery

    Niels Agatz;Ann Campbell;Moritz Fleischmann;Martin Savelsbergh

  • Prepositioning supplies in preparation for disasters

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Philip C. Jones

  • Decision Support for Consumer Direct Grocery Initiatives

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Martin W. P. Savelsbergh

  • The Same-Day Delivery Problem for Online Purchases

    Stacy A. Voccia;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Incentive Schemes for Attended Home Delivery Services

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Martin Savelsbergh

  • Forty years of periodic vehicle routing

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Jill Hardin Wilson

  • The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem: Dynamic Pickup and Delivery with Deadlines and Random Ready Times

    Marlin W. Ulmer;Barrett W. Thomas;Ann Melissa Campbell;Nicholas Woyak

  • The orienteering problem with stochastic travel and service times

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Michel Gendreau;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Customer acceptance mechanisms for home deliveries in metropolitan areas

    Jan Fabian Ehmke;Ann Melissa Campbell

  • Inventory routing in practice

    Ann M. Campbell;Lloyd W. Clarke;Martin W. P. Savelsbergh

  • Vehicle routing to minimize time-dependent emissions in urban areas

    Jan Fabian Ehmke;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem with Deadlines

    Ann M. Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Ensuring service levels in routing problems with time windows and stochastic travel times

    Jan Fabian Ehmke;Ann Melissa Campbell;Timothy L. Urban

  • The p-hub center allocation problem

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Timothy J. Lowe;Li Zhang

  • Assessment of transportation system disruption and accessibility to critical amenities during flooding: Iowa case study.

    Yazeed Alabbad;Yazeed Alabbad;Jerry Mount;Ann Melissa Campbell;Ibrahim Demir

  • Challenges and Opportunities in Attended Home Delivery

    Niels Agatz;Ann Melissa Campbell;Moritz Fleischmann;Martin Savelsbergh

  • Revenue management opportunities for Internet retailers

    Niels Agatz;Ann M. Campbell;Moritz Fleischmann;Jo A. E. E. van Nunen

  • Edge intersection graphs of single bend paths on a grid

    Martin Charles Golumbic;Marina Lipshteyn;Michal Stern

Frequent Co-Authors

Barrett W. Thomas
Barrett W. Thomas University of Iowa
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh
Martin W. P. Savelsbergh Georgia Institute of Technology
Timothy J. Lowe
Timothy J. Lowe University of Iowa
Tom Van Woensel
Tom Van Woensel Eindhoven University of Technology
M. Grazia Speranza
M. Grazia Speranza University of Brescia
Claudia Archetti
Claudia Archetti École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales
Arie Tamir
Arie Tamir Tel Aviv University
Michel Gendreau
Michel Gendreau Polytechnique Montréal
Mark R. Prausnitz
Mark R. Prausnitz Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology opens doors to a variety of professional tracks, many of which can be enhanced or complemented by specialized business degrees. For those aiming to become tech entrepreneurs, online mba entrepreneurship programs provide valuable skills in innovation, business growth, and leadership.

Financing your education doesn’t have to be a barrier. Consider affordable online mba programs no gmat, which make graduate education more accessible for busy professionals or those seeking to avoid standardized test requirements.

Engineering projects often require expert management. By pursuing a cheapest online master's in project management, you can gain the organizational and leadership skills valued in technical industries.

Technology expertise also pairs well with sector-specific pathways such as real estate development. An real estate degree can be a unique route for engineers interested in construction, sustainable design, or property management.

Each of these online degrees can support a rewarding career, whether you plan to move into management, launch a startup, or apply engineering skills in new industries.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Melissa Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles