World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
41298
World Ranking
6024
National Ranking
343

Albert Schömig publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Schömig sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 440 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Albert Schömig D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Schömig sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert Schömig is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and engineering, with particular expertise in biomedical engineering, surgery, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work encompasses key topics within cardiovascular health and technology. These include mechanical circulatory support devices, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education.

Albert Schömig has published research in several recognized academic journals, including:

  • The Lancet
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Schömig include:

  • "Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials with 6-month follow-up" (2024, The Lancet)
  • "Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Versus Durable Polymer New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease With and Without Diabetes Mellitus" (2021, Journal of the American Heart Association)
  • "Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography" (2023, Journal of Clinical Medicine)

Collaborative efforts are evident in Schömig's publication record, with frequent co-authors including Melchior Seyfarth, Adnan Kastrati, Jacob Eifer Møller, Josè P.S. Henriques, and Daniel Burkhoff.

Best Publications

  • Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

    Christoph Stettler;Christoph Stettler;Simon Wandel;Sabin Allemann;Adnan Kastrati

  • Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome.

    Alessandra Moretti;Milena Bellin;Andrea Welling;Christian Billy Jung

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction

    Melchior Seyfarth;Dirk Sibbing;Iris Bauer;Georg Fröhlich

  • Estimated Radiation Dose Associated With Cardiac CT Angiography

    Jörg Hausleiter;Tanja Meyer;Franziska Hermann;Martin Hadamitzky

  • Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Josef Dirschinger;Franz Dotzer

  • Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

    Jörg Hausleiter;Tanja Meyer;Martin Hadamitzky;Ester Huber

  • Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Nicolas von Beckerath;Alban Dibra

  • Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Pretreatment: The ISAR-REACT 2 Randomized Trial

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Franz-Josef Neumann;Franz Dotzer

  • Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment ("cooling-off" strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial.

    Franz-Josef Neumann;Adnan Kastrati;Gisela Pogatsa-Murray;Julinda Mehilli

  • Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis in Diabetic Patients

    Alban Dibra;Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Jürgen Pache

  • Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel

    Dirk Sibbing;Tanja Morath;Julia Stegherr;Siegmund Braun

  • A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel.

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Helmut Schühlen;Josef Dirschinger

  • Coronary Stenting plus Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Compared with Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Albert Schömig;Adnan Kastrati;Josef Dirschinger;Julinda Mehilli

  • Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point.

    Gjin Ndrepepa;Peter B. Berger;Julinda Mehilli;Melchior Seyfarth

  • 5-Year Prognostic Value of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gjin Ndrepepa;Klaus Tiroch;Massimiliano Fusaro;Dritan Keta

  • Effect of a high loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

    Iris Müller;Melchior Seyfarth;Silja Rüdiger;Beate Wolf

  • Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Dietlind Zohlnhöfer;Ilka Ott;Julinda Mehilli;Kathrin Schömig

  • Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Adnan Kastrati;Alban Dibra;Christian Spaulding;Gerrit J Laarman

  • Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Josef Dirschinger;Jürgen Pache

  • Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial.

    Julinda Mehilli;Adnan Kastrati;Stefanie Schulz;Stefan Früngel

Frequent Co-Authors

Adnan Kastrati
Adnan Kastrati Technical University of Munich
Julinda Mehilli
Julinda Mehilli Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Franz-Josef Neumann
Franz-Josef Neumann University of Freiburg
Robert A. Byrne
Robert A. Byrne Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Jörg Hausleiter
Jörg Hausleiter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Steffen Massberg
Steffen Massberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Kübler
Wolfgang Kübler Heidelberg University
Peter B. Berger
Peter B. Berger Duke University
Stephan G. Nekolla
Stephan G. Nekolla Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine but want to explore alternative or complementary career pathways, online health degrees provide flexible and accelerated options. For those looking to step into the healthcare management field quickly, accelerated healthcare programs can prepare you for leadership roles in less time than a traditional route.

Registered nurses who wish to advance their practice and scope can benefit from specialized rn to np programs, which offer a seamless transition from bedside nursing to becoming a nurse practitioner through flexible online bridge curriculums.

Those interested in nutrition and public health can consider enrolling in an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, paving the way for careers in dietetics, health education, or wellness coaching.

Aspiring healthcare executives should explore cahme-accredited online mha programs, which combine rigorous academics with the convenience of remote learning—ideal for building leadership capabilities in a fast-changing healthcare environment.

Best Scientists Citing Albert Schömig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles