World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 6023 5660 344 330 440 41298

Albert Schömig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albert Schömig between 1976 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albert Schömig published across 49 years, from 1976 to 2024, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2004. 2 of the 442 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2004. 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 34 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1976 2024

442 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albert Schömig: publications per year, 1976 to 2024
Year Publications
1976 3
1977 3
1978 5
1979 4
1980 5
1981 5
1982 5
1983 2
1984 5
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 5
1989 4
1990 13
1991 9
1992 9
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 8
1997 6
1998 7
1999 2
2000 9
2001 13
2002 14
2003 24
2004 34
2005 30
2006 31
2007 31
2008 28
2009 28
2010 28
2011 23
2012 20
2013 14
2014 2
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 442
Download as CSV

Albert Schömig publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Schömig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 440 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 440
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Albert Schömig D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Schömig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Albert Schömig is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and engineering, with particular expertise in biomedical engineering, surgery, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work encompasses key topics within cardiovascular health and technology. These include mechanical circulatory support devices, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and artificial intelligence applications in healthcare and education.

Albert Schömig has published research in several recognized academic journals, including:

  • The Lancet
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Schömig include:

  • "Temporary mechanical circulatory support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials with 6-month follow-up" (2024, The Lancet)
  • "Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Versus Durable Polymer New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease With and Without Diabetes Mellitus" (2021, Journal of the American Heart Association)
  • "Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography" (2023, Journal of Clinical Medicine)

Collaborative efforts are evident in Schömig's publication record, with frequent co-authors including Melchior Seyfarth, Adnan Kastrati, Jacob Eifer Møller, Josè P.S. Henriques, and Daniel Burkhoff.

Best Publications

  • Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

    Christoph Stettler;Christoph Stettler;Simon Wandel;Sabin Allemann;Adnan Kastrati

  • Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome.

    Alessandra Moretti;Milena Bellin;Andrea Welling;Christian Billy Jung

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction

    Melchior Seyfarth;Dirk Sibbing;Iris Bauer;Georg Fröhlich

  • Estimated Radiation Dose Associated With Cardiac CT Angiography

    Jörg Hausleiter;Tanja Meyer;Franziska Hermann;Martin Hadamitzky

  • Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Josef Dirschinger;Franz Dotzer

  • Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

    Jörg Hausleiter;Tanja Meyer;Martin Hadamitzky;Ester Huber

  • Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Nicolas von Beckerath;Alban Dibra

  • Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Pretreatment: The ISAR-REACT 2 Randomized Trial

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Franz-Josef Neumann;Franz Dotzer

  • Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment ("cooling-off" strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial.

    Franz-Josef Neumann;Adnan Kastrati;Gisela Pogatsa-Murray;Julinda Mehilli

  • Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis in Diabetic Patients

    Alban Dibra;Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Jürgen Pache

  • Impact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel

    Dirk Sibbing;Tanja Morath;Julia Stegherr;Siegmund Braun

  • A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel.

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Helmut Schühlen;Josef Dirschinger

  • Coronary Stenting plus Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Compared with Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Albert Schömig;Adnan Kastrati;Josef Dirschinger;Julinda Mehilli

  • Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point.

    Gjin Ndrepepa;Peter B. Berger;Julinda Mehilli;Melchior Seyfarth

  • 5-Year Prognostic Value of No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Gjin Ndrepepa;Klaus Tiroch;Massimiliano Fusaro;Dritan Keta

  • Effect of a high loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

    Iris Müller;Melchior Seyfarth;Silja Rüdiger;Beate Wolf

  • Stem Cell Mobilization by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Dietlind Zohlnhöfer;Ilka Ott;Julinda Mehilli;Kathrin Schömig

  • Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    Adnan Kastrati;Alban Dibra;Christian Spaulding;Gerrit J Laarman

  • Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types

    Adnan Kastrati;Julinda Mehilli;Josef Dirschinger;Jürgen Pache

  • Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial.

    Julinda Mehilli;Adnan Kastrati;Stefanie Schulz;Stefan Früngel

Frequent Co-Authors

Adnan Kastrati
Adnan Kastrati Technical University of Munich
Julinda Mehilli
Julinda Mehilli Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Franz-Josef Neumann
Franz-Josef Neumann University of Freiburg
Robert A. Byrne
Robert A. Byrne Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Jörg Hausleiter
Jörg Hausleiter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Steffen Massberg
Steffen Massberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Kübler
Wolfgang Kübler Heidelberg University
Peter B. Berger
Peter B. Berger Duke University
Stephan G. Nekolla
Stephan G. Nekolla Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine but want to explore alternative or complementary career pathways, online health degrees provide flexible and accelerated options. For those looking to step into the healthcare management field quickly, accelerated healthcare programs can prepare you for leadership roles in less time than a traditional route.

Registered nurses who wish to advance their practice and scope can benefit from specialized rn to np programs, which offer a seamless transition from bedside nursing to becoming a nurse practitioner through flexible online bridge curriculums.

Those interested in nutrition and public health can consider enrolling in an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, paving the way for careers in dietetics, health education, or wellness coaching.

Aspiring healthcare executives should explore cahme-accredited online mha programs, which combine rigorous academics with the convenience of remote learning—ideal for building leadership capabilities in a fast-changing healthcare environment.

Best Scientists Citing Albert Schömig

Trending Scientists