World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barrett W. Thomas

Barrett W. Thomas

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4195
World Ranking
11818
National Ranking
4826

Barrett W. Thomas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barrett W. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 80 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Barrett W. Thomas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barrett W. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barrett W. Thomas is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a focus on several subfields such as automotive engineering, building and construction, industrial and manufacturing engineering, transportation, and management information systems.

Their research spans a variety of topics primarily related to transportation and logistics. Key topics include:

  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Smart Parking Systems Research
  • Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Barrett W. Thomas has published in a number of venues, with a significant number of publications in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transportation Science
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

Among recent research papers, notable works include:

  • "The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem: Dynamic Pickup and Delivery with Deadlines and Random Ready Times" (2020) published in Transportation Science
  • "On modeling stochastic dynamic vehicle routing problems" (2020) published in EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics
  • "Opportunities for reinforcement learning in stochastic dynamic vehicle routing" (2022) published in Computers & Operations Research
  • "The Value of Autonomous Vehicles for Last-Mile Deliveries in Urban Environments" (2021) published in Management Science
  • "Building Trust in Home Services-Stochastic Team-Orienteering with Consistency Constraints" (2020) published in Transportation Science

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Marlin W. Ulmer
  • Ann Melissa Campbell
  • Sara M. Reed
  • Florentin D. Hildebrandt
  • Sadjad Anzabi Zadeh

Best Publications

  • The Same-Day Delivery Problem for Online Purchases

    Stacy A. Voccia;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • The stochastic p-hub center problem with service-level constraints

    Thaddeus Sim;Timothy J. Lowe;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Same-day delivery with heterogeneous fleets of drones and vehicles

    Marlin W. Ulmer;Barrett W. Thomas

  • The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem: Dynamic Pickup and Delivery with Deadlines and Random Ready Times

    Marlin W. Ulmer;Barrett W. Thomas;Ann Melissa Campbell;Nicholas Woyak

  • The orienteering problem with stochastic travel and service times

    Ann Melissa Campbell;Michel Gendreau;Barrett W. Thomas

  • A Compressed-Annealing Heuristic for the Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows

    Jeffrey W. Ohlmann;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Vehicle routing to minimize time-dependent emissions in urban areas

    Jan Fabian Ehmke;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Waiting Strategies for Anticipating Service Requests from Known Customer Locations

    Barrett W. Thomas

  • Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem with Deadlines

    Ann M. Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Anticipatory Route Selection

    Barrett W. Thomas;Chelsea C. White

  • Rollout Policies for Dynamic Solutions to the Multivehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Demand and Duration Limits

    Justin C. Goodson;Jeffrey W. Ohlmann;Barrett W. Thomas

  • On modeling stochastic dynamic vehicle routing problems

    Marlin W. Ulmer;Justin C. Goodson;Dirk C. Mattfeld;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Preemptive depot returns for dynamic same-day delivery

    Marlin W. Ulmer;Barrett W. Thomas;Dirk C. Mattfeld

  • Opportunities for reinforcement learning in stochastic dynamic vehicle routing

    Unknown

  • Edge intersection graphs of single bend paths on a grid

    Martin Charles Golumbic;Marina Lipshteyn;Michal Stern

  • Cyclic-order neighborhoods with application to the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demand

    Justin C. Goodson;Jeffrey W. Ohlmann;Barrett W. Thomas

  • A rollout algorithm framework for heuristic solutions to finite-horizon stochastic dynamic programs

    Justin C. Goodson;Barrett W. Thomas;Jeffrey W. Ohlmann

  • Deep Q-learning for same-day delivery with vehicles and drones

    Xinwei Chen;Marlin W. Ulmer;Barrett W. Thomas

  • The dynamic shortest path problem with anticipation

    Barrett W. Thomas;Chelsea C. White

  • A Comparison of Anticipatory Algorithms for the Dynamic and Stochastic Traveling Salesman Problem

    Gianpaolo Ghiani;Emanuele Manni;Barrett W. Thomas

  • The Value of Autonomous Vehicles for Last-Mile Deliveries in Urban Environments

    Sara Reed;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

  • Data-driven approaches for emissions-minimized paths in urban areas

    Jan Fabian Ehmke;Ann Melissa Campbell;Barrett W. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann Melissa Campbell
Ann Melissa Campbell University of Iowa
Chelsea C. White
Chelsea C. White Georgia Institute of Technology
Christian Blum
Christian Blum Spanish National Research Council
Dirk C. Mattfeld
Dirk C. Mattfeld Technische Universität Braunschweig
Stein W. Wallace
Stein W. Wallace Norwegian School of Economics
Arie Tamir
Arie Tamir Tel Aviv University
Michel Gendreau
Michel Gendreau Polytechnique Montréal
Timothy J. Lowe
Timothy J. Lowe University of Iowa
Manuel López-Ibáñez
Manuel López-Ibáñez University of Manchester
Gianpaolo Ghiani
Gianpaolo Ghiani University of Salento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens a wide range of online education and career options for students. For those looking to quickly boost their credentials, there are many easy certifications to get online that pay well, including IT, cybersecurity, and cloud technology certificates.

If you’re considering an advanced degree, exploring the quickest cheapest masters degree programs can save you both time and money. These accelerated programs allow professionals to gain specialized expertise and enter the workforce faster.

It’s important to find options that align with your career goals. Check out some of the masters degrees that are worth it in the technology field. These programs are highly valued by employers and offer strong job prospects.

Don’t overlook online associate degree programs either. These two-year degrees can provide foundational skills and help you start in entry-level tech jobs or continue toward a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Barrett W. Thomas

Trending Scientists