World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5280 4897 2887 2615 227 8643

Angelle M. Sander publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angelle M. Sander between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angelle M. Sander published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2019. 37 of the 303 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2019. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 21 publications
1989 2025

303 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angelle M. Sander: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 8
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 5
2003 3
2004 1
2005 3
2006 6
2007 6
2008 7
2009 8
2010 8
2011 12
2012 8
2013 10
2014 13
2015 12
2016 11
2017 11
2018 10
2019 30
2020 28
2021 30
2022 8
2023 18
2024 16
2025 21
Total 303
Download as CSV

Angelle M. Sander publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelle M. Sander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 227
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Angelle M. Sander D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelle M. Sander sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Angelle M. Sander is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and clinical investigations related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) and associated neurological and psychological conditions.

The scientist's work spans numerous fields of study within medicine, with specific contributions in epidemiology, emergency medicine, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology.

Key topics explored by Angelle M. Sander include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions in:

  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Rehabilitation Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Prominent recent papers authored or co-authored by Angelle M. Sander include:

  • "Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study," 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • "Traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease: insights from the United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Research Program," 2023, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study," 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for psychological distress among persons with traumatic brain injury," 2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Angelle M. Sander has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • John D. Corrigan
  • Joseph T. Giacino
  • Ross Zafonte
  • Shannon B. Juengst
  • David O. Okonkwo

Best Publications

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study

    Michael A McCrea;Joseph T Giacino;Joseph T Giacino;Jason Barber;Nancy R Temkin

  • Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury.

    Jeffrey S. Kreutzer;Jennifer H. Marwitz;William Walker;Angelle Sander

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: findings from the TBI model systems.

    Mark Sherer;Angelle M. Sander;Todd G. Nick;Walter M. High

  • Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

    John K. Yue;Esther L. Yuh;Frederick K. Korley;Ethan A. Winkler

  • The community integration questionnaire revisited: An assessment of factor structure and validity

    Angelle M. Sander;Kathleen L. Fuchs;Walter M. High;Karyl M. Hall

  • A Multicenter Longitudinal Investigation of Return to Work and Community Integration Following Traumatic Brain Injury

    Angelle M. Sander;Jeffrey S. Krentzer;Mitchell Rosenthal;Richard Delmonico

  • What Is Community Integration Anyway?: Defining Meaning Following Traumatic Brain Injury

    Angelle M. Sander;Allison Clark;Monique R. Pappadis

  • Assessment of Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Presentation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.

    Seth A. Seabury;Étienne Gaudette;Dana P. Goldman;Amy J. Markowitz

  • Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury

    Margaret A. Struchen;Allison N. Clark;Angelle M. Sander;Monique R. Mills

  • Relationship of family functioning to progress in a post-acute rehabilitation programme following traumatic brain injury

    Angelle M. Sander;Jerome S. Caroselli;Walter M. High;Cory Becker

  • TBI-QOL: Development and Calibration of Item Banks to Measure Patient Reported Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

    David S. Tulsky;David S. Tulsky;Pamela A. Kisala;David Victorson;Noelle Carlozzi

  • Neuropsychological assessment and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury: a review.

    Mark Sherer;Thomas A Novack;Angelle M Sander;Margaret A Struchen

  • Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study.

    Harvey S Levin;Harvey S Levin;Nancy R Temkin;Jason Barber;Lindsay D Nelson

  • Traumatic brain injury caregivers: A qualitative analysis of spouse and parent perspectives on quality of life

    Anna L. Kratz;Angelle M. Sander;Tracey A. Brickell;Rael T. Lange

  • Utility of post-traumatic amnesia in predicting 1-year productivity following traumatic brain injury: comparison of the Russell and Mississippi PTA classification intervals

    R. Nakase-Richardson;M. Sherer;M. Sherer;R. T. Seel;T. Hart

  • Examining the contribution of social communication abilities and affective/behavioral functioning to social integration outcomes for adults with traumatic brain injury.

    Margaret A. Struchen;Monique R. Pappadis;Angelle M. Sander;Angelle M. Sander;Christina S. Burrows;Christina S. Burrows

  • Predictors of psychological health in caregivers of patients with closed head injury

    A. M. Sander;W. M. High;H. J. Hannay;M. Sherer

  • Exploring experiences of intimacy from the viewpoint of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their partners.

    Carol J. Gill;Angelle M. Sander;Nina Robins;Diana K. Mazzei

  • Race and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: influence of confounding factors.

    Mark Sherer;Todd G. Nick;Angelle M. Sander;Tessa Hart

  • Making connections after brain injury: development and evaluation of a social peer-mentoring program for persons with traumatic brain injury.

    Margaret A. Struchen;Lynne Cole Davis;Jay A. Bogaards;Terri Hudler-Hull

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin A. Hanks
Robin A. Hanks Wayne State University
Noelle E. Carlozzi
Noelle E. Carlozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David S. Tulsky
David S. Tulsky University of Delaware
Louis M. French
Louis M. French United States Army Research Laboratory
Rael T. Lange
Rael T. Lange Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Kessler Foundation
Joseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino Massachusetts General Hospital
Elizabeth A. Hahn
Elizabeth A. Hahn Northwestern University
Tessa Hart
Tessa Hart Yeshiva University
John D. Corrigan
John D. Corrigan The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to multiple pathways—whether your interest is clinical practice, counseling, or research. With increasing demand for mental health professionals, many institutions now offer flexible online degrees that accommodate busy lifestyles and varying career goals.

If you are interested in specializing, consider programs with regional strengths. For example, the best college counseling programs in San Diego are known for their diverse faculty and community engagement. On the West Coast, you can also review the best counseling program rankings in Seattle to find highly-ranked options tailored to new trends in therapy.

The South offers unique opportunities as well. Take a look at the best college counseling programs in South for a blend of tradition and innovation. Meanwhile, prospective students in California’s Central Valley can explore Stockton counseling degree programs, which are recognized for strong local partnerships.

As psychological services continue to diversify, online degrees and regional specialties play a critical role in shaping your educational journey and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Angelle M. Sander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles