World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9105 8507 20 20 156 7313

Valéria Csépe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Valéria Csépe between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Valéria Csépe published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2010. 7 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2010. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Valéria Csépe: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 4
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 6
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 3
2009 8
2010 13
2011 6
2012 9
2013 4
2014 12
2015 5
2016 3
2017 9
2018 2
2019 7
2020 5
2021 12
2022 5
2023 3
2024 4
2025 3
Total 174
Download as CSV

Valéria Csépe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valéria Csépe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Valéria Csépe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valéria Csépe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Valéria Csépe is affiliated with the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Hungary. Their research primarily spans neuroscience and psychology, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. Other subfields of interest include experimental and cognitive psychology, genetics, and statistics and probability.

Their work centers on several main topics, including:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Valéria Csépe has contributed to multiple publication venues, notably:

  • Scientia et Securitas
  • Biologia Futura
  • Nature Genetics
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience

Among their recent scientific papers are the following:

  • "Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia," 2022, published in Nature Genetics
  • "Genome-wide association study reveals new insights into the heritability and genetic correlates of developmental dyslexia," 2020, published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people," 2022, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Methodological Issues in Literacy Research Across Languages: Evidence From Alphabetic Orthographies," 2021, published in Reading Research Quarterly
  • "Implicit anticipation of probabilistic regularities: Larger CNV emerges for unpredictable events," 2021, published in Neuropsychologia

Frequent collaborators in Valéria Csépe's research include:

  • Andrea Kóbor
  • Ferenc Honbolygó
  • Karolina Janacsek
  • Dezső Németh
  • Zsófia Kardos

The scientist was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading A Cross-Language Investigation

    Johannes C. Ziegler;Daisy Bertrand;Denes Toth;Valeria Csepe

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies

    Kristina Moll;Franck Ramus;Juergen Bartling;Jennifer Bruder

  • Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes.

    Istvańn Winkler;Teija Kujala;Hannu Tiitinen;Päivi Sivonen

  • Evoked potential correlates of stimulus deviance during wakefulness and sleep in cat--animal model of mismatch negativity.

    Valéria Csépe;G Karmos;M Molnár

  • Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations

    István Winkler;Anne Lehtokoski;Paavo Alku;Paavo Alku;Martti Vainio

  • Auditory-evoked potentials as indicator of brain serotonergic activity--first evidence in behaving cats.

    Georg Juckel;Georg Juckel;Márk Molnár;Márk Molnár;Ulrich Hegerl;Ulrich Hegerl;Valéria Csépe;Valéria Csépe

  • On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity.

    Valéria Csépe

  • Cognitive Development of Fluent Word Reading Does Not Qualitatively Differ Between Transparent and Opaque Orthographies

    Anniek Vaessen;Daisy Bertrand;Dénes Tóth;Valéria Csépe

  • Auditory evoked potentials reflect serotonergic neuronal activity--a study in behaving cats administered drugs acting on 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus.

    Georg Juckel;Ulrich Hegerl;Márk Molnár;Valéria Csépe

  • Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively assessed reading- and language-related skills in up to 34,000 people

    Unknown

  • The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study

    Dénes Szũcs;Dénes Szũcs;Fruzsina Soltész;Éva Jármi;Valéria Csépe

  • Genome-wide association study reveals new insights into the heritability and genetic correlates of developmental dyslexia.

    Alessandro Gialluisi;Till F.M. Andlauer;Till F.M. Andlauer;Nazanin Mirza-Schreiber;Kristina Moll

  • Interactions between transient and long-term auditory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity

    István Winkler;Nelson Cowan;Valéria Csépe;István Czigler

  • Sensitivity to Rhythmic Parameters in Dyslexic Children: A Comparison of Hungarian and English.

    Zsuzsanna Surányi;Valéria Csépe;Valéria Csépe;Ulla Richardson;Jennifer M. Thomson

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies new variants associated with a cognitive predictor of dyslexia

    Alessandro Gialluisi;Till F.M. Andlauer;Nazanin Mirza-Schreiber;Kristina Moll

  • A combined event-related potential and neuropsychological investigation of developmental dyscalculia

    Fruzsina Soltész;Dénes Szűcs;Dénes Szűcs;Judit Dékány;Attila Márkus

  • Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field.

    V. Csépe;C. Pantev;M. Hoke;S. Hampson

  • Access to numerical information is dependent on the modality of stimulus presentation in mental addition: a combined ERP and behavioral study

    Dénes Szucs;Valéria Csépe

  • Correlation dimension changes accompanying the occurrence of the mismatch negativity and the P3 event-related potential component

    M. Molnár;J.E. Skinner;V. Csepe;I. Winkler

  • The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition

    Dénes Szucs;Valéria Csépe

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-François Démonet
Jean-François Démonet University Hospital of Lausanne
Paavo H.T. Leppänen
Paavo H.T. Leppänen University of Jyväskylä
Gerd Schulte-Körne
Gerd Schulte-Körne Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Dezso Nemeth
Dezso Nemeth Eötvös Loránd University
Karolina Janacsek
Karolina Janacsek Eötvös Loránd University
Heikki Lyytinen
Heikki Lyytinen University of Jyväskylä
Karin Landerl
Karin Landerl University of Graz
Bertram Müller-Myhsok
Bertram Müller-Myhsok Max Planck Society
Juha Kere
Juha Kere Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens diverse career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. With the convenience of online programs, students can complete foundational and advanced degrees that meet educational requirements for state licensure.

Each state and city may have unique standards. For example, Cincinnati licensed therapist education requirements emphasize accredited graduate programs and supervised clinical hours. In contrast, if you are considering practice in Cleveland, you should familiarize yourself with the Cleveland licensed therapist requirements. For those interested in Colorado, it's important to review the latest licensed therapist requirements in Colorado Springs. Similarly, understanding how to become a licensed therapist in Columbus can help guide your academic and professional journey.

Online psychology programs provide the flexibility to complete coursework around your schedule. This is an excellent option for those balancing work or family commitments while pursuing licensure and career advancement in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Valéria Csépe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles