World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mary Frances Luce

Mary Frances Luce

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5497 5099 2602 2366 89 12649

Mary Frances Luce publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Frances Luce between 1992 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Frances Luce published across 32 years, from 1992 to 2023, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2009. 1 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2009. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1992 2023

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Frances Luce: publications per year, 1992 to 2023
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 5
1999 3
2000 6
2001 3
2002 1
2003 5
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 7
2009 10
2010 4
2011 8
2012 2
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 2
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 89
Download as CSV

Mary Frances Luce publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Frances Luce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 89
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Frances Luce D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Frances Luce sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Frances Luce is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spans several areas within the social sciences, with a focus on interdisciplinary approaches that intersect psychology, sociology, and marketing.

Their main fields of study include Social Sciences, with specific contributions in Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Marketing. Their scholarly work covers topics such as Social and Intergroup Psychology, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Digital Marketing and Social Media, and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification.

Mary Frances Luce has published multiple papers, including the following recent works:

  • The Preference for Moderation Scale, 2020, Journal of Consumer Research
  • The Preference for Moderation Scale, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Preference for Moderation Scale, 2021, PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Product-facilitated conversations: When does starting a conversation by mentioning a product lead to better conversational outcomes?, 2023, Journal of Consumer Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Aimée Drolet (3 coauthored works)
  • Li Jiang (3 coauthored works)
  • Reid Hastie (3 coauthored works)
  • Benjamin Rossi (2 coauthored works)
  • Benjamin C. Rossi (1 coauthored work)

The primary publication venues where Mary Frances Luce has contributed are:

  • Journal of Consumer Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology

Best Publications

  • Constructive Consumer Choice Processes

    James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce;John W. Payne

  • Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions

    Mary Frances Luce

  • Choice Processing in Emotionally Difficult Decisions

    Mary Frances Luce;James R. Bettman;John W. Payne

  • Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice:

    Mary Frances Luce;John W. Payne;James R. Bettman

  • When time is money : Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure

    John W. Payne;James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce

  • Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions.

    Unknown

  • Feeling Love and Doing More for Distant Others: Specific Positive Emotions Differentially Affect Prosocial Consumption

    Lisa A. Cavanaugh;James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce

  • Correlation, conflict, and choice.

    James R. Bettman;Eric J. Johnson;Mary F. Luce;John W. Payne

  • Emotional Decisions: Tradeoff Difficulty and Coping in Consumer Choice

    Mary Frances Luce;James R. Bettman;John W. Payne

  • Planning to Make Unplanned Purchases? The Role of In-Store Slack in Budget Deviation

    Karen M. Stilley;J. Jeffrey Inman;Kirk L. Wakefield

  • Separate Neural Mechanisms Underlie Choices and Strategic Preferences in Risky Decision Making

    Vinod Venkatraman;John W. Payne;James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce

  • Understanding the Effects of Process-Focused versus Outcome-Focused Thought in Response to Advertising

    Jennifer Edson Escalas;Mary Frances Luce

  • The Rationalizing Effects of Cognitive Load on Emotion-Based Trade-off Avoidance

    Aimee Drolet;Mary Frances Luce

  • Boundary Conditions on Unconscious Thought in Complex Decision Making

    John W. Payne;Adriana Samper;James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce

  • High Stakes Decision Making: Normative, Descriptive and Prescriptive Considerations

    Howard Kunreuther;Robert Meyer;Richard Zeckhauser;Paul Slovic

  • Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising.

    Jennifer Edson Escalas;Mary Frances Luce

  • The Concept of Voluntary Consent

    Robert M. Nelson;Tom Beauchamp;Victoria A. Miller;William Reynolds

  • When Does Choice Reveal Preference? Moderators of Heuristic versus Goal‐Based Choice

    Aimee Drolet;Mary Frances Luce;Itamar Simonson

  • Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results

    Barbara E. Kahn;Mary Frances Luce

  • Appraising the Appraisal-Tendency Framework

    Lisa A. Cavanaugh;James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce;John W. Payne

  • Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice

    Unknown

  • Consumer Decision Making

    Mary Frances Luce

  • The Construction of Preference: Constructive Consumer Choice Processes

    James R. Bettman;Mary Frances Luce;John W. Payne

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Bettman
James R. Bettman Duke University
John W. Payne
John W. Payne Duke University
Barbara E. Kahn
Barbara E. Kahn University of Pennsylvania
Christine Moorman
Christine Moorman Duke University
Laura A. Peracchio
Laura A. Peracchio University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Tom L. Beauchamp
Tom L. Beauchamp Georgetown University
Eric Johnson
Eric Johnson Columbia University
Peter A. Ubel
Peter A. Ubel Duke University
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Scott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online education opportunities. For those looking to advance quickly, a master degree online can provide specialized knowledge in just one year, helping professionals upskill efficiently.

If you’re seeking to fast-track your undergraduate education, consider enrolling in an accelerated online bachelor's degree program. Many of these options offer flexible schedules and tailored coursework, making them ideal for working adults or career changers.

For those drawn to social work, several online msw programs are available at an affordable cost, letting you make a difference in communities, schools, or healthcare settings.

Interested in behavior analysis? Earning a bcba certification online can qualify you for specialized roles working with individuals with behavioral challenges.

With online options growing every year, students can tailor their learning paths to fit specific goals, schedules, or budgets—empowering them for meaningful careers in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Frances Luce

Trending Scientists