World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
51365
World Ranking
2071
National Ranking
994

Tom L. Beauchamp publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom L. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 208 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Tom L. Beauchamp D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom L. Beauchamp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom L. Beauchamp is affiliated with Georgetown University in the United States and has made contributions primarily within the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans various subfields, including General Health Professions, Small Animals, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Physiology.

The research topics frequently addressed by Beauchamp involve Ethics in medical practice, Animal testing and alternatives, Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation, Patient Dignity and Privacy, Medical and Health Sciences Research, and Legal principles and applications.

Beauchamp's recent scholarly papers include:

  • "Common Morality Principles in Biomedical Ethics: Responses to Critics" (2021) published in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • "The Origins and Drafting of the Belmont Report" (2020) published in Perspectives in biology and medicine
  • "Response to Commentaries" (2020) published in The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
  • "On Conditions that Compromise Autonomous Choice" (2020) published in The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
  • "Lucky Me: The Amiable and Weighty Influences on My Career" (2020) published in The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with Beauchamp are:

  • David DeGrazia
  • James F. Childress

The venues where Beauchamp has most frequently published include:

  • The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
  • Perspectives in biology and medicine
  • The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
  • Dialogue and Universalism

Beauchamp has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, notably with Oxford University Press. One such book is "Principles of Animal Research Ethics" published in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Principles of biomedical ethics

    Tom L Beauchamp;James F Childress

  • An enquiry concerning human understanding : a critical edition

    David Hume;Tom L. Beauchamp

  • Ethical Theory and Business

    Tom L. Beauchamp;Norman E. Bowie

  • An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics

    Ruth R. Faden;Nancy E. Kass;Steven N. Goodman;Peter Pronovost

  • Contemporary Issues in Bioethics

    Tom L. Beauchamp;LeRoy Walters

  • Hume and the Problem of Causation

    Tom L. Beauchamp;Alexander Rosenberg

  • Methods and principles in biomedical ethics

    T L Beauchamp

  • Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.

    Tom Beauchamp;James Childress

  • Medical ethics : the moral responsibilities of physicians

    Tom L. Beauchamp;Laurence B. McCullough

  • Informed consent: its history, meaning, and present challenges.

    Tom L. Beauchamp

  • Ethical issues in social science research

    R. Jay Wallace;Tom Beauchamp;Ruth R. Faden

  • Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy

    Tom L. Beauchamp

  • The Research-Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight

    Nancy E. Kass;Ruth R. Faden;Steven N. Goodman;Peter Pronovost

  • Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care.

    Ruth R. Faden;Tom L. Beauchamp;Nancy E. Kass

  • A dissertation on the passions ; The natural history of religion : a critical edition

    David Hume;Tom L. Beauchamp

  • The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics

    Tom L. Beauchamp;R. G. Frey

  • Ethics and epidemiology

    Steven S. Coughlin;Steven S. Coughlin;Tom L. Beauchamp;Douglas L. Weed

  • The Concept of Voluntary Consent

    Robert M. Nelson;Tom Beauchamp;Victoria A. Miller;William Reynolds

  • A Defense of the Common Morality

    Tom L. Beauchamp

  • The virtuous journalist

    Stephen Klaidman;Tom L. Beauchamp

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth R. Faden
Ruth R. Faden Johns Hopkins University
Norman E. Bowie
Norman E. Bowie University of Minnesota
Nancy E. Kass
Nancy E. Kass Johns Hopkins University
Rebecca Dresser
Rebecca Dresser Washington University in St. Louis
Mary Frances Luce
Mary Frances Luce Duke University
Alexander Rosenberg
Alexander Rosenberg Duke University
Dan W. Brock
Dan W. Brock Harvard University
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Alexander Morgan Capron
Alexander Morgan Capron University of Southern California
Arthur L. Caplan
Arthur L. Caplan New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities has become more accessible thanks to a variety of online degree programs. Students interested in making a difference in their communities might consider msw programs online, which provide flexible options for those aiming for roles in social work.

If you are passionate about behavioral analysis and wish to work with individuals with special needs, obtaining a bcba certification can open doors to specialized clinical and educational positions. For working professionals or those seeking to fast-track their education, accelerated msw programs offer a quicker route to graduation without sacrificing academic quality.

Psychology is another dynamic field with high demand. For those looking to qualify sooner, accelerated psychology programs online provide an efficient way to gain credentials and start a rewarding career.

Whether you are entering the job market or seeking to advance your current role, these diverse online programs and certificates offer flexible, affordable, and comprehensive pathways tailored to your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tom L. Beauchamp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles