World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
27889
World Ranking
14554
National Ranking
7366

Bernard Lo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Lo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 322 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bernard Lo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Lo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernard Lo is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. The scientific work predominantly covers fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a more focused exploration of subfields such as Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

Research topics closely associated with Bernard Lo include:

  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms

Among the most recent publications are:

  • Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19 (2020), published in Annals of Internal Medicine
  • A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020), published in JAMA
  • Mitigating Inequities and Saving Lives with ICU Triage during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020), published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • CPR in the Covid-19 Era - An Ethical Framework (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Time for NIH to lead on data sharing (2020), published in Science

Bernard Lo frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Douglas B. White
  • Jay S. Steingrub
  • Catherine L. Hough
  • Shannon S. Carson
  • Monica E. Peek

The publication record also highlights consistent contributions to the following journals:

  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • CHEST Journal
  • JAMA
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Neurology

Best Publications

  • Do Patients Want to Participate in Medical Decision Making

    William M. Strull;Bernard Lo;Gerald Charles

  • Do house officers learn from their mistakes

    A W Wu;S Folkman;S J McPhee;B Lo

  • Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice

    Bernard Lo;Marilyn J Field

  • A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Douglas B. White;Bernard Lo

  • Withholding and Withdrawal of Life Support from the Critically Ill

    N G Smedira;B H Evans;L S Grais;N H Cohen

  • The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians

    Elizabeth Murray;Bernard Lo;Lance Pollack;Karen Donelan

  • The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. A second look.

    S H Wanzer;D D Federman;S J Adelstein;C K Cassel

  • Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research

    Bernard Lo;Lindsay Parham

  • To tell the truth : Ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients

    Albert W. Wu;Thomas A. Cavanaugh;Stephen J. McPhee;Bernard Lo

  • An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units.

    Gabriel T. Bosslet;Thaddeus M. Pope;Gordon D. Rubenfeld;Bernard Lo

  • Palliative Options of Last Resort: A Comparison of Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking, Terminal Sedation, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    Timothy E. Quill;Bernard Lo;Dan W. Brock

  • Patient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment

    Bernard Lo;Gary A. McLeod;Glenn Saika

  • Discussing Palliative Care with Patients

    Bernard Lo;Timothy Quill;James Tulsky

  • Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians.

    Bernard Lo;Delaney Ruston;Laura W. Kates;Robert M. Arnold

  • Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians

    Bernard Lo

  • How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed

    Ashwini Sehgal;Alison Galbraith;Margaret Chesney;Patricia Schoenfeld

  • Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions.

    Douglas B. White;Mitchell H. Katz;John M. Luce;Bernard Lo

  • Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?

    Sara L. Swenson;Stephanie Buell;Patti Zettler;Martha White

  • Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risk

    Bernard Lo

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Randall Curtis
J. Randall Curtis University of Washington
Lance M. Pollack
Lance M. Pollack University of California, San Francisco
Joseph A. Catania
Joseph A. Catania Oregon State University
Deborah Grady
Deborah Grady University of California, San Francisco
Stephen J. McPhee
Stephen J. McPhee University of California, San Francisco
James A. Tulsky
James A. Tulsky Harvard University
Margaret A. Chesney
Margaret A. Chesney University of California, San Francisco
Elizabeth Murray
Elizabeth Murray University College London
Dan W. Brock
Dan W. Brock Harvard University
Albert W. Wu
Albert W. Wu Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is just one of many healthcare career paths in the U.S. If you’re considering alternative or supplementary degrees, there are a variety of related fields that can be pursued online. For example, professionals passionate about wellness can explore nutrition degrees online to support patients through dietary expertise.

Those interested in the management side of healthcare should learn how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure they’re choosing accredited, reputable online MHA pathways. Nurses looking to advance their credentials may consider rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which offer flexibility for working professionals.

If you’re focused on a terminal practice or leadership role, investigating the shortest dnp programs can help accelerate your career. Each of these pathways plays a vital role in the healthcare ecosystem and offers opportunities for both clinical and non-clinical advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard Lo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles