What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social psychology
- Developmental psychology
- Pedagogy
His main research concerns Mathematics education, Goal orientation, Teaching method, Academic achievement and Goal theory.
Within one scientific family, Eric M. Anderman focuses on topics pertaining to Early adolescents under Mathematics education, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Multilevel model.
His study in Goal orientation is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Developmental psychology and Need for achievement.
His Teaching method study incorporates themes from Expectancy theory, Self-concept and Perception.
His Academic achievement research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Social environment and Primary education.
His Goal theory research is under the purview of Pedagogy.
His most cited work include:
- Classroom Goal Structure, Student Motivation, and Academic Achievement (778 citations)
- Motivation and Schooling in the Middle Grades (744 citations)
- The Development and Validation of Scales Assessing Students' Achievement Goal Orientations (622 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Eric M. Anderman mostly deals with Mathematics education, Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Goal orientation and Academic achievement.
His Teaching method and Goal theory study in the realm of Mathematics education connects with subjects such as Transition.
The Social psychology study combines topics in areas such as Sociology of Education and Cognition.
His work focuses on many connections between Developmental psychology and other disciplines, such as Perception, that overlap with his field of interest in Mastery learning.
His research in Goal orientation intersects with topics in Cognitive development, Need for achievement, Applied psychology, Relation and Self-efficacy.
He combines subjects such as Early adolescence and Primary education with his study of Academic achievement.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mathematics education (26.61%)
- Social psychology (25.00%)
- Developmental psychology (24.19%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Developmental psychology (24.19%)
- Social psychology (25.00%)
- Medical education (8.06%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Eric M. Anderman focuses on Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Medical education, Mathematics education and Instrumental and intrinsic value.
His study in the field of Academic achievement and Adolescent development also crosses realms of Verbal aggression and Verbal abuse.
His Academic achievement study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Self-concept, Perfectionism, Compensation and Burnout.
In his study, Attribution is strongly linked to Sociology of Education, which falls under the umbrella field of Social psychology.
His Student achievement study in the realm of Mathematics education interacts with subjects such as Style.
His Instrumental and intrinsic value research integrates issues from Feeling, Science education and Path analysis.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Achievement motivation theory: Balancing precision and utility (17 citations)
- Teachers’ reactions to experiences of violence: an attributional analysis (14 citations)
- Addressing violence against educators through measurement and research (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- Developmental psychology
- Pedagogy
Eric M. Anderman mostly deals with Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Need for achievement, Motivation theory and Point.
His work in Social psychology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Structural equation modeling.
In general Developmental psychology study, his work on Perfectionism and Academic achievement often relates to the realm of Best fitting, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
Eric M. Anderman integrates many fields in his works, including Need for achievement and Confusion.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
