World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
12040
World Ranking
4954
National Ranking
2719

Stuart A. Karabenick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart A. Karabenick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stuart A. Karabenick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart A. Karabenick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart A. Karabenick was a researcher affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their scholarly work spanned psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on education and developmental and educational psychology as key subfields. The areas they explored included innovative teaching and learning methods, school choice and performance, as well as motivation and self-concept in sports.

The scientist authored papers addressing a variety of education-related topics, often emphasizing cognitive and motivational aspects within learning environments. Notable works include the following:

  • "Associations between learning analytics dashboard exposure and motivation and self-regulated learning," 2020, published in Computers & Education
  • "Teachers caring for students and students caring for math: The development of culturally and linguistically diverse adolescents' math motivation," 2021, Journal of School Psychology
  • "Strategy Motivation and Strategy Use: Role of Student Appraisals of Utility and Cost," 2021, Metacognition and Learning
  • "Less direct than you thought: Do teachers transmit math value to students through their cognitive support for understanding?" 2021, Learning and Instruction
  • "Measuring Fundamentalism Across the Abrahamic Faiths," 2021, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Throughout their career, Karabenick collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Anna-Lena Dicke
  • Nayssan Safavian
  • Jacquelynne S. Eccles
  • Stephen J. Aguilar
  • Stephanie D. Teasley

Their research was published in established venues such as:

  • Computers & Education
  • Journal of School Psychology
  • Metacognition and Learning
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Primary research topics addressed by Karabenick included:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Online Learning and Analytics

The researcher's work intersected multiple disciplines, contributing to the understanding of psychological, social, and educational processes affecting learners and educators alike. Their investigations frequently involved questions of motivation, utility appraisal, and cognitive support in educational contexts.

Best Publications

  • Relationship of Academic Help Seeking to the Use of Learning Strategies and Other Instrumental Achievement Behavior in College Students.

    Stuart A. Karabenick;John R. Knapp

  • Perceived Achievement Goal Structure and College Student Help Seeking.

    Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Professional Development Implications of Teachers' Beliefs and Attitudes toward English Language Learners.

    Stuart A. Karabenick;Phyllis A. Clemens Noda

  • Assessing Academic Self-Regulated Learning

    Christopher A. Wolters;Paul R. Pintrich;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach

    Stuart A Karabenick

  • Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains.

    Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia;Amanda M. Durik;Anne Marie M Conley;Kenneth E. Barron

  • Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help

    Peter L. Benson;Stuart A. Karabenick;Richard M. Lerner

  • Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean?

    Stuart A. Karabenick;Michael E. Woolley;Jeanne M. Friedel;Bridget V. Ammon

  • Inherent Association Between Academic Delay of Gratification, Future Time Perspective, and Self-Regulated Learning

    Hefer Bembenutty;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms

    Jean-Louis Berger;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Help seeking and the need for academic assistance

    Stuart A. Karabenick;John R. Knapp

  • Relations among Physical Attractiveness, Body Attitudes, and Self-Concept in Male and Female College Students

    Richard M. Lerner;Stuart A. Karabenick;Joyce L. Stuart

  • Psychopathology and academic performance: The role of motivation and learning strategies.

    Barbara E. Brackney;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Academic Delay of Gratification

    Héfer Bembenutty;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Strategic help seeking : implications for learning and teaching

    Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Help seeking in academic settings : goals, groups, and contexts

    Stuart A. Karabenick;Richard S. Newman

  • Physical attractiveness, body attitudes, and self-concept in late adolescents.

    Richard M. Lerner;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Taking Teacher Responsibility into Account(ability): Explicating Its Multiple Components and Theoretical Status.

    Fani Lauermann;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • Teacher Motivation: Theory and Practice

    Paul W. Richardson;Stuart A. Karabenick;Helen M.G. Watt

  • Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Education

    Jeffrey R. Albrecht;Stuart A. Karabenick

  • The Meaning and Measure of Teachers' Sense of Responsibility for Educational Outcomes.

    Fani Lauermann;Stuart A. Karabenick

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
Helen Margaret Gilchrist Watt
Helen Margaret Gilchrist Watt University of Sydney
Greg J. Duncan
Greg J. Duncan University of California, Irvine
Thurston Domina
Thurston Domina University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas K. Srull
Thomas K. Srull University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia Michigan State University
Paul R. Pintrich
Paul R. Pintrich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Avi Kaplan
Avi Kaplan Temple University
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in psychology, exploring related fields such as social work can broaden your professional opportunities. Online psychology degrees can serve as a strong foundation for various roles in mental health, counseling, and human services. However, pursuing social work typically requires additional credentials, which vary by state.

For example, New Jersey social work license requirements specify educational backgrounds and supervised fieldwork. If you plan to work elsewhere, it’s important to review the requirements to be a social worker in New Mexico or learn about becoming a social worker in New York, as each state mandates different qualifications and exams.

If your career goals include practicing in the South, research the necessary certifications by checking out the requirements to be a social worker in North Carolina. Overall, earning an online psychology degree opens doors to diverse career pathways, but understanding state-specific licensing regulations is crucial for success in allied professions like social work.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart A. Karabenick

Recently Published Articles