World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Thomas K. Srull publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Srull sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas K. Srull D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Srull sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas K. Srull is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research collaborations have included work with Robert S. Wyer.

Best Publications

  • Handbook of Social Cognition

    Robert S. Wyer;Thomas K. Srull

  • The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications

    Thomas K. Srull;Robert S. Wyer

  • Person memory and judgment.

    Thomas K. Srull;Robert S. Wyer

  • Human cognition in its social context

    Robert S. Wyer;Thomas K. Srull

  • Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments

    Thomas K. Srull;Robert S. Wyer

  • Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models

    Thomas K. Srull

  • Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory.

    Thomas K. Srull;Meryl Lichtenstein;Myron Rothbart

  • Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information

    Robert S. Wyer jr;T.K. Srull

  • The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration

    Robert S. Wyer;Thomas K. Srull

  • The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing

    Robert S. Wyer jr;T.K. Srull

  • The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self

    Thomas K. Srull;Robert S. Wyer

  • Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment

    Meryl Lichtenstein;Thomas K Srull

  • General Principles and Individual Differences in the Self as a Habitual Reference Point: An Examination of Self-Other Judgments of Similarity

    Thomas K. Srull;Lisa Gaelick

  • SELF-AWARENESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE, AND SELF-REINFORCEMENT IN RELATION TO PERSONAL AND SOCIAL STANDARDS

    Edward Diener;Thomas K. Srull

  • The cognitive representation of persons and groups and its effect on recall and recognition memory

    Robert S. Wyer;Galen V. Bodenhausen;Thomas K. Srull

  • Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition.

    Thomas K. Srull

  • Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material

    Robert S. Wyer;Thomas Kevin Srull;Sallie E. Gordon;Jon Hartwick

  • Organizational and retrieval processes in person memory: An examination of processing objectives, presentation format, and the possible role of self-generated retrieval cues

    Thomas K. Srull

  • A dual process model of impression formation.

    Thomas K. Srull;Robert S. Wyer

  • Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences

    Thomas K Srull;Robert S. Wyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Wyer
Robert S. Wyer University of Cincinnati
Thomas Holtgraves
Thomas Holtgraves Ball State University
Stuart A. Karabenick
Stuart A. Karabenick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ed Diener
Ed Diener University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Galen V. Bodenhausen
Galen V. Bodenhausen Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, exploring online degrees can open up flexible paths to various rewarding careers. Many psychology students go on to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), but it's important to know that licensure requirements differ by state. For example, those considering practice in Idaho should review the Idaho licensed professional counselor requirements to understand education, supervised experience, and exam expectations.

Illinois students should check the specific Illinois lpc licensure requirements, as these can impact your study and career planning. Similarly, if you're targeting Indiana, make sure to familiarize yourself with the latest lpc licensure requirements in Indiana.

For those pursuing licensure in Iowa, understanding the lpc licensure requirements in Iowa is essential for a smooth certification process. By researching state-specific criteria, you can choose online programs that align with your goals and set yourself up for a successful counseling career in your preferred location.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas K. Srull

Recently Published Articles