World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven J. Sherman

Steven J. Sherman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 93 843 737 533 455 201 31604

Steven J. Sherman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven J. Sherman between 1967 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven J. Sherman published across 55 years, from 1967 to 2021, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2002. 2 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2002. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1967 2021

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven J. Sherman: publications per year, 1967 to 2021
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 2
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 0
1975 5
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 2
1981 3
1982 4
1983 5
1984 6
1985 4
1986 3
1987 3
1988 4
1989 4
1990 7
1991 4
1992 7
1993 2
1994 5
1995 6
1996 9
1997 3
1998 5
1999 9
2000 8
2001 6
2002 10
2003 5
2004 2
2005 4
2006 8
2007 10
2008 5
2009 5
2010 7
2011 3
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 5
2016 2
2017 2
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Steven J. Sherman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 201
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven J. Sherman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 93
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1988 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Steven J. Sherman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, gender studies, and language and linguistics.

The scientist's research topics focus on law, economics, and judicial systems, as well as social and intergroup psychology. Additional areas of interest include gender studies in language and linguistics, language diversity, and identity.

Recent publications by Steven J. Sherman include:

  • Underestimating the unrepresented: Cognitive biases disadvantage pro se litigants in family law cases., 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • The Spatial Ingroup Bias: Ingroup Teams Are Positioned Where Writing Starts, 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sherman are:

  • Kathryn M. Kroeper
  • Victor D. Quintanilla
  • Michael B. Frisby
  • Nedim Yel
  • Amy G. Applegate

The scientist has published in venues such as Psychology Public Policy and Law and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, each hosting at least one of their scholarly articles.

Steven J. Sherman received recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1988, marking a notable point in their professional career.

Best Publications

  • PERCEIVING PERSONS AND GROUPS

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.

    Brian Lickel;David L. Hamilton;Grazyna Wieczorkowska;Amy Lewis

  • Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association

    Russell H. Fazio;Jeaw-mei Chen;Elizabeth C. McDonel;Steven J. Sherman

  • Imagination Inflation: Imagining a Childhood Event Inflates Confidence That It Occurred

    Maryanne Garry;Charles G. Manning;Elizabeth F. Loftus;Steven J. Sherman

  • On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects

    Paul M Herr;Steven J Sherman;Russell H Fazio

  • Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues

    Daniel Kahneman;Ilana Ritov;David Schkade;Steven J. Sherman

  • The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds

    Keith D. Markman;Igor Gavanski;Steven J. Sherman;Matthew N. McMullen

  • On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction.

    Steven J. Sherman

  • The Natural History of Cigarette Smoking: Predicting Young-Adult Smoking Outcomes From Adolescent Smoking Patterns

    Laurie Chassin;Clark C. Presson;Steven J. Sherman;Debra A. Edwards

  • The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood: demographic predictors of continuity and change.

    Laurie Chassin;Clark C. Presson;Jennifer S. Rose;Steven J. Sherman

  • The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood in a midwestern community sample: multiple trajectories and their psychosocial correlates.

    Laurie Chassin;Clark C. Presson;Steven C. Pitts;Steven J. Sherman

  • Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease The Mediating Effect of Ease of Imagery

    Steven J. Sherman;Robert B. Cialdini;Donna F. Schwartzman;Kim D. Reynolds

  • Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: Longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation.

    Laurie Chassin;Clark C. Presson;Steven J. Sherman;Daniel Montello

  • Stereotype-Based Expectancies: Effects on Information Processing and Social Behavior

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman;Catherine M. Ruvolo

  • The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment

    Nira Liberman;Yaacov Trope;Sean M. McCrea;Steven J. Sherman

  • Predicting the Onset of Cigarette Smoking in Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study

    Laurie Chassin;Clark C. Presson;Steven J. Sherman;Eric Corty

  • Constructing and reconstructing the past and the future in the present.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Steven J. Sherman

  • Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation.

    Richard B Skov;Steven J Sherman

  • The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect

    Faith Gleicher;Kathryn A. Kost;Sara M. Baker;Alan J. Strathman

  • Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Cigarette Smoking: the Effects of Context and Motivation

    Steven J. Sherman;Jennifer S. Rose;Kelly Koch;Clark C. Presson

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie Chassin
Laurie Chassin Arizona State University
Clark C. Presson
Clark C. Presson Arizona State University
David L. Hamilton
David L. Hamilton University of California, Santa Barbara
Jeffrey W. Sherman
Jeffrey W. Sherman University of California, Davis
Allen R. McConnell
Allen R. McConnell Miami University
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua
Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University
Richard W. Olshavsky
Richard W. Olshavsky Indiana University
Ravi Dhar
Ravi Dhar Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs opens up a range of educational and professional opportunities. Whether you are beginning your journey or looking for specialized training, there are numerous degree pathways to consider.

If you’re interested in foundational knowledge and flexible learning, an online associates degree in psychology can provide a solid starting point. For those seeking a more in-depth education and wider career options, pursuing a psychology bachelor online degree is a popular next step. These degrees often lead to roles in counseling, human services, or preparation for graduate studies.

Students with a focus on behavioral interventions might consider specialized paths such as aba online programs, which prepare graduates to work with individuals with autism and other behavioral challenges. Alternatively, behavioral psychology college programs focus on understanding and applying principles of behavior analysis across various settings, including mental health, education, and research.

With the flexibility of online learning, these pathways cater to students with diverse goals and backgrounds, making psychology one of the most accessible and adaptable fields in higher education.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles