World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
20798
World Ranking
4699
National Ranking
2605

Frank R. Kardes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Kardes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank R. Kardes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Kardes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Frank R. Kardes is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and business, with a particular focus on consumer behavior and decision-making processes.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Commentaries on "Abductive Theory Construction", 2021, Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Is Nestlé a Lady? The Feminine Brand Name Advantage, 2021, Journal of Marketing
  • Is unnatural unhealthy? Think about it: Overcoming negative halo effects from food labels, 2021, Psychology and Marketing
  • Special fonts: The competing roles of difficulty and uniqueness in consumer inference, 2020, Psychology and Marketing
  • A Multistage, Multiprocess Analysis of Consumer Judgment: A Selective Review and Conceptual Framework, 2020, Journal of Consumer Psychology

Frequent co-authors of Kardes include:

  • Donald R. Gaffney
  • Ruomeng Wu
  • Steven S. Posavac
  • Ruth Pogacar
  • Xiaoqi Han

Kardes has published multiple articles in these journals:

  • Psychology and Marketing
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Marketing
  • Sustainability

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these broader fields, their work covers several subfields of study such as:

  • Marketing
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Kardes addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Media, Gender, and Advertising

In recognition of their contributions, Kardes was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • On the automatic activation of attitudes.

    Russell H. Fazio;David M. Sanbonmatsu;Martha C. Powell;Frank R. Kardes

  • Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective

    Paul M. Herr;Frank R. Kardes;John Kim

  • The Role of Customer Gratitude in Relationship Marketing

    Robert W. Palmatier;Cheryl Burke Jarvis;Jennifer R. Bechkoff;Frank R. Kardes

  • Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts

    Frank R. Kardes;Steven S. Posavac;Maria L. Cronley

  • Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split

    Dawn Iacobucci;Steven S. Posavac;Frank R. Kardes;Matthew J. Schneider

  • Consumer Behavior and Managerial Decision Making

    Frank R. Kardes

  • The Effects of Physiological Arousal on Information Processing and Persuasion

    David M. Sanbonmatsu;Frank R. Kardes

  • The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference

    Susan Powell Mantel;Frank R. Kardes

  • Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion

    Frank R. Kardes

  • Order-of-Entry Effects on Consumer Memory and Judgment: An Information Integration Perspective:

    Frank R. Kardes;Gurumurthy Kalyanaram

  • Handbook of Consumer Psychology

    Curtis P. Haugtvedt;Paul M. Herr;Frank R. Kardes

  • The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership

    Rajdeep Grewal;Raj Mehta;Frank R Kardes

  • The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price-Quality Inference

    Frank R. Kardes;Maria L. Cronley;James J. Kellaris;Steven S. Posavac

  • Non-Conscious Influences on Consumer Choice

    Gavan J. Fitzsimons;J. Wesley Hutchinson;Patti Williams;Joseph W. Alba

  • The Timing of Repeat Purchases of Consumer Durable Goods: The Role of Functional Bases of Consumer Attitudes

    Rajdeep Grewal;Raj Mehta;Frank R. Kardes

  • An Investigation of the Mediational Mechanisms Underlying Attitudinal Conditioning

    John Kim;Chris T. Allen;Frank R. Kardes

  • In Defense of Experimental Consumer Psychology

    Frank R. Kardes

  • How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information

    Hélène Deval;Susan P. Mantel;Frank R. Kardes;Steven S. Posavac

  • Selective hypothesis testing

    David M. Sanbonmatsu;Steven S. Posavac;Frank R. Kardes;Susan P. Mantel

  • Effects of Initial Product Judgments on Subsequent Memory-Based Judgments

    Frank R. Kardes

  • The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation

    David M Sanbonmatsu;Frank R Kardes;Paul M Herr

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Sanbonmatsu
David M. Sanbonmatsu University of Utah
Gavan J. Fitzsimons
Gavan J. Fitzsimons Duke University
Edward R. Hirt
Edward R. Hirt Indiana University
Dawn Iacobucci
Dawn Iacobucci Vanderbilt University
Rajdeep Grewal
Rajdeep Grewal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert S. Wyer
Robert S. Wyer University of Cincinnati
Bob M. Fennis
Bob M. Fennis University of Groningen
Arvind Rangaswamy
Arvind Rangaswamy Pennsylvania State University
Russell H. Fazio
Russell H. Fazio The Ohio State University
John Kim
John Kim University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and related degrees opens up a broad spectrum of career pathways. As psychology is closely linked to many fields, students often look at both psychology and cheapest sociology online programs to gain insight into human behavior, society, and group dynamics.

For those seeking a flexible and budget-friendly education, a range of cheap accredited online psychology degrees offer a practical route into the field without the higher tuition costs. These programs are often designed to help students balance work, life, and study.

If your interests are clinical, you can consider clinical psychology online programs, which prepare graduates for roles in mental health services, assessment, and therapy. For those aiming for specialist or advanced positions, pursuing an online doctorate of psychology is the next step, leading to opportunities in research, academia, and clinical leadership.

Whether you’re just starting or seeking to advance, these pathways demonstrate the variety and accessibility of online learning in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Frank R. Kardes

Trending Scientists