World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
15895
World Ranking
3986
National Ranking
2236

David L. Hamilton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Hamilton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 138 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David L. Hamilton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Hamilton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Hamilton is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on social psychology, sociology and political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics investigated in their work include social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and social representations and identity.

Recent publications by David L. Hamilton include:

  • Intergroup Context Moderates the Impact of White Americans' Identification on Racial Categorization of Ambiguous Faces, 2023, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • On vagueness and parochialism in psychological research on groups, 2022, Behavioral and Brain Sciences

The venues in which they have frequently published are:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David L. Hamilton include Jacqueline M. Chen, Chanel Meyers, Kristin Pauker, Sarah E. Gaither, and Jeffrey W. Sherman.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior

    Unknown

  • ILLUSORY CORRELATION IN INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION. A COGNITIVE BASIS OF STEREOTYPIC JUDGMENTS.

    David L. Hamilton;Robert K. Gifford

  • PERCEIVING PERSONS AND GROUPS

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.

    Brian Lickel;David L. Hamilton;Grazyna Wieczorkowska;Amy Lewis

  • Stereotype-Based Expectancies: Effects on Information Processing and Social Behavior

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman;Catherine M. Ruvolo

  • A Cognitive -Attributional Analysis of Stereotyping1

    David L. Hamilton

  • Illusory correlation and the maintenance of stereotypic beliefs.

    David L. Hamilton;Terrence L. Rose

  • Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation.

    David L. Hamilton;Lawrence B. Katz;Von O. Leirer

  • Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members.

    Matthew T. Crawford;Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton

  • Elements of a Lay Theory of Groups: Types of Groups, Relational Styles, and the Perception of Group Entitativity

    Brian Lickel;David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • Organizational Processes in Impression Formation

    Reid Hastie;Thomas M. Ostrom;Ebbe B. Ebbesen;Robert S. Wyer

  • Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status.

    Bernd Simon;David L. Hamilton

  • Illusory Correlations: Implications for Stereotype Theory and Research

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum.

    David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman;Brian Lickel

  • Target entitativity: implications for information processing about individual and group targets.

    Allen R. McConnell;Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton

  • A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings?

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;David L. Hamilton

  • The Central Role of Entitativity in Stereotypes of Social Categories and Task Groups

    Julie Spencer-Rodgers;David L. Hamilton;Steven J. Sherman

  • Personality attributes associated with extreme response style.

    Unknown

  • Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships.

    Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton;Amy C. Lewis

  • Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals

    Jacqueline M. Chen;David L. Hamilton

  • The formation of stereotypic beliefs: Further evidence for distinctiveness-based illusory correlations.

    David L. Hamilton;Patricia M. Dugan;Tina K. Trolier

  • On-line and memory-based aspects of individual and group target judgments.

    Allen R. McConnell;Steven J. Sherman;David L. Hamilton

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Sherman
Steven J. Sherman Indiana University
Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Diane M. Mackie
Diane M. Mackie University of California, Santa Barbara
Jeffrey W. Sherman
Jeffrey W. Sherman University of California, Davis
Allen R. McConnell
Allen R. McConnell Miami University
Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Stuart Galloway
Stuart Galloway University of Strathclyde
Louise M. Burke
Louise M. Burke Australian Catholic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the doors to diverse career options, both online and on-campus. Many students choose online psychology programs for their flexibility and accessibility. These degrees can prepare you for careers in therapy, counseling, research, or even specialized roles in schools and healthcare.

If your goal is to become a licensed therapist, understanding local requirements is vital. The process and criteria can vary significantly by location. For example, if you’re interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Raleigh or want to know more about how to become a licensed therapist in Reno, each state has its own licensing bodies, supervised experience requirements, and examination processes.

When exploring opportunities like licensed therapist requirements in Richmond or learning about becoming a licensed therapist in Riverside, it’s clear that research and careful planning are crucial. Choosing the right online degree can help you meet these local standards and succeed in your preferred psychology career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Hamilton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles