World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 102 692 655 352 329 265 77757

David E. Root publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David E. Root between 1964 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David E. Root published across 63 years, from 1964 to 2026, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 281 publications in 2023. 37 of the 649 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 281. Peak 281 publications in 2023. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 281 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 36 publications 2026: 1 publication
1964 2026

649 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David E. Root: publications per year, 1964 to 2026
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 2
2005 0
2006 3
2007 2
2008 4
2009 11
2010 8
2011 13
2012 14
2013 17
2014 21
2015 19
2016 19
2017 34
2018 21
2019 24
2020 20
2021 19
2022 37
2023 281
2024 28
2025 36
2026 1
Total 649
Download as CSV

David E. Root publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Root sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 265–274 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 265 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88 265
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

David E. Root D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Root sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55 102
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David E. Root is a researcher affiliated with MIT in the United States with a focus on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work concentrates on molecular biology, genetics, cancer research, oncology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientific topics covered extensively in their publications include CRISPR and genetic engineering, protein degradation and inhibitors, cancer genomics and diagnostics, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, chromatin remodeling and cancer, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

David E. Root has been published prominently in several journals. The most frequent venues include:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Nature Communications
  • Cancer Discovery

Examples of their recent scientific papers are:

  • Chronos: a cell population dynamics model of CRISPR experiments that improves inference of gene fitness effects, 2021, Genome Biology
  • In vivo CRISPR screens reveal the landscape of immune evasion pathways across cancer, 2022, Nature Immunology
  • Acquired FGFR and FGF Alterations Confer Resistance to Estrogen Receptor (ER) Targeted Therapy in ER+ Metastatic Breast Cancer, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Noncanonical open reading frames encode functional proteins essential for cancer cell survival, 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • Paralog knockout profiling identifies DUSP4 and DUSP6 as a digenic dependence in MAPK pathway-driven cancers, 2021, Nature Genetics

Frequent collaborators with David E. Root include:

  • Federica Piccioni
  • William C. Hahn
  • Amy Goodale
  • Nicole S. Persky
  • Francisca Vázquez

Best Publications

  • Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells

    Ophir Shalem;Ophir Shalem;Neville E Sanjana;Neville E Sanjana;Ella Hartenian;Xi-Shun Shi

  • Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9

    John G Doench;Nicolo Fusi;Meagan Sullender;Mudra Hegde

  • A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles.

    Aravind Subramanian;Rajiv Narayan;Steven M. Corsello;Steven M. Corsello;David D. Peck

  • Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1

    David A. Barbie;Pablo Tamayo;Jesse S. Boehm;So Young Kim

  • Defining a Cancer Dependency Map

    Aviad Tsherniak;Francisca Vazquez;Francisca Vazquez;Phil G. Montgomery;Barbara A. Weir;Barbara A. Weir

  • lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation

    Mitchell Guttman;Julie Donaghey;Bryce W. Carey;Manuel Garber

  • A Lentiviral RNAi Library for Human and Mouse Genes Applied to an Arrayed Viral High-Content Screen

    Jason Moffat;Dorre A. Grueneberg;Xiaoping Yang;So Young Kim;So Young Kim

  • Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.

    Robin M Meyers;Jordan G Bryan;James M McFarland;Barbara A Weir

  • COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation

    Cory M Johannessen;Jesse S. Boehm;So Young Kim;Sapana R. Thomas;Sapana R. Thomas

  • Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation

    John G Doench;Ella Hartenian;Daniel B Graham;Zuzana Tothova

  • Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer

    Richard Possemato;Kevin M. Marks;Yoav D. Shaul;Michael E. Pacold

  • In vivo CRISPR screening identifies Ptpn2 as a cancer immunotherapy target

    Robert T. Manguso;Robert T. Manguso;Hans W. Pope;Hans W. Pope;Margaret D. Zimmer;Margaret D. Zimmer;Flavian D. Brown

  • Identification of RPS14 as a 5q - syndrome gene by RNA interference screen

    Benjamin L. Ebert;Jennifer Pretz;Jocelyn Bosco;Cindy Y. Chang

  • The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is required for growth of CD44+CD24– stem cell–like breast cancer cells in human tumors

    Lauren L.C. Marotta;Vanessa Almendro;Vanessa Almendro;Andriy Marusyk;Michail Shipitsin

  • β-Catenin-Driven Cancers Require a YAP1 Transcriptional Complex for Survival and Tumorigenesis

    Joseph Rosenbluh;Deepak Nijhawan;Deepak Nijhawan;Deepak Nijhawan;Andrew G. Cox;Andrew G. Cox;Xingnan Li

  • Subtype-specific genomic alterations define new targets for soft-tissue sarcoma therapy.

    Jordi Barretina;Barry S Taylor;Barry S Taylor;Shantanu Banerji;Shantanu Banerji;Alexis H Ramos;Alexis H Ramos

  • CDK8 is a colorectal cancer oncogene that regulates β-catenin activity

    Ron Firestein;Adam Bass;So Young Kim;Ian Frederick Dunn

  • KRAS and YAP1 Converge to Regulate EMT and Tumor Survival

    Diane D. Shao;Wen Xue;Elsa B. Krall;Elsa B. Krall;Arjun Bhutkar

  • Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities

    Kendall R. Sanson;Ruth E. Hanna;Mudra Hegde;Katherine F. Donovan

  • (R)-2-Hydroxyglutarate Is Sufficient to Promote Leukemogenesis and Its Effects Are Reversible

    Julie Aurore Losman;Ryan E. Looper;Peppi Koivunen;Sungwoo Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

William C. Hahn
William C. Hahn Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Todd R. Golub
Todd R. Golub Harvard University
Jesse S. Boehm
Jesse S. Boehm Broad Institute
Francisca Vazquez
Francisca Vazquez Broad Institute
John G. Doench
John G. Doench Broad Institute
Aviad Tsherniak
Aviad Tsherniak Broad Institute
Levi A. Garraway
Levi A. Garraway Roche (United States)
Barbara A. Weir
Barbara A. Weir Janssen (United States)
Benjamin L. Ebert
Benjamin L. Ebert Harvard University
Rameen Beroukhim
Rameen Beroukhim Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in genetics opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and dynamic career options in the fast-evolving healthcare sector. If you are interested in the administrative side of medicine, consider pursuing a bachelors in health administration. This program equips you with leadership and organizational skills in healthcare settings, making you a valuable asset in hospitals, clinics, and research institutions.

For those looking for a quicker entry into healthcare careers, earning a medical billing and coding certification is an excellent choice. This credential offers foundational knowledge on healthcare documentation, insurance processing, and medical coding, with flexible online courses to fit your schedule.

If patient care is your primary interest, explore good nursing schools with high acceptance rates. These institutions provide accessible pathways to a nursing degree, helping you transition smoothly into clinical roles.

Additionally, many professionals choose to advance their healthcare careers through a degree in healthcare administration. Accelerated online programs allow you to quickly develop the specialized skills required to manage health services and lead teams in diverse healthcare environments.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Root

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles