World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
44851
World Ranking
9944
National Ranking
4351

Jesse S. Boehm publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse S. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 172 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jesse S. Boehm D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse S. Boehm sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesse S. Boehm is affiliated with the Broad Institute in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology and Cancer Research. The subfields of their study include Genetics, Oncology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers main topics such as Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Renal and related cancers, Cancer Cells and Metastasis, and Cell Image Analysis Techniques.

Jesse S. Boehm has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Nature Cancer
  • Genome biology

Their recent papers include:

  • Discovering the anticancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling, 2020, Nature Cancer
  • Chronos: a cell population dynamics model of CRISPR experiments that improves inference of gene fitness effects, 2021, Genome biology
  • An expanded universe of cancer targets, 2021, Cell
  • A first-generation pediatric cancer dependency map, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Global computational alignment of tumor and cell line transcriptional profiles, 2021, Nature Communications

Jesse S. Boehm frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, including William C. Hahn, Francisca Vázquez, James M. McFarland, David E. Root, and Aviad Tsherniak. These collaborations reflect ongoing research efforts within cancer biology and genetic engineering disciplines.

Best Publications

  • The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers

    Rameen Beroukhim;Craig H. Mermel;Craig H. Mermel;Dale Porter;Guo Wei

  • A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles.

    Aravind Subramanian;Rajiv Narayan;Steven M. Corsello;Steven M. Corsello;David D. Peck

  • Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1

    David A. Barbie;Pablo Tamayo;Jesse S. Boehm;So Young Kim

  • Next-generation characterization of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia

    Mahmoud Ghandi;Franklin W. Huang;Franklin W. Huang;Franklin W. Huang;Judit Jané-Valbuena;Judit Jané-Valbuena;Gregory V. Kryukov

  • Defining a Cancer Dependency Map

    Aviad Tsherniak;Francisca Vazquez;Francisca Vazquez;Phil G. Montgomery;Barbara A. Weir;Barbara A. Weir

  • Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.

    Robin M Meyers;Jordan G Bryan;James M McFarland;Barbara A Weir

  • COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation

    Cory M Johannessen;Jesse S. Boehm;So Young Kim;Sapana R. Thomas;Sapana R. Thomas

  • Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway

    Vasanthi S. Viswanathan;Matthew J. Ryan;Harshil D. Dhruv;Shubhroz Gill

  • Organoid Modeling of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment.

    James T. Neal;Xingnan Li;Junjie Zhu;Valeria Giangarra

  • Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors

    Viktor A. Adalsteinsson;Viktor A. Adalsteinsson;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Samuel S. Freeman;Samuel S. Freeman;Atish D. Choudhury

  • CDK8 is a colorectal cancer oncogene that regulates β-catenin activity

    Ron Firestein;Adam Bass;So Young Kim;Ian Frederick Dunn

  • Integrative genomic approaches identify IKBKE as a breast cancer oncogene.

    Jesse S. Boehm;Jean J. Zhao;Jun Yao;So Young Kim

  • Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution.

    Uri Ben-David;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Yuen-Yi Tseng;Noah F Greenwald;Noah F Greenwald;Noah F Greenwald

  • A GPX4-dependent cancer cell state underlies the clear-cell morphology and confers sensitivity to ferroptosis.

    Yilong Zou;Yilong Zou;Michael J. Palte;Amy A. Deik;Haoxin Li;Haoxin Li

  • Discovering the anti-cancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling.

    Steven M. Corsello;Steven M. Corsello;Rohith T. Nagari;Ryan D. Spangler;Jordan Rossen

  • Synthetic lethal interaction between oncogenic KRAS dependency and STK33 suppression in human cancer cells.

    Claudia Scholl;Stefan Fröhling;Ian F. Dunn;Anna C. Schinzel

  • Highly parallel identification of essential genes in cancer cells

    Biao Luo;Hiu Wing Cheung;Aravind Subramanian;Tanaz Sharifnia

  • AKT-Independent Signaling Downstream of Oncogenic PIK3CA Mutations in Human Cancer

    Krishna M. Vasudevan;David A. Barbie;David A. Barbie;Michael A. Davies;Rosalia Rabinovsky

  • A public genome-scale lentiviral expression library of human ORFs

    Xiaoping Yang;Jesse S Boehm;Xinping Yang;Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani

  • Somatic ERCC2 Mutations Correlate with Cisplatin Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

    Eliezer M Van Allen;Kent W. Mouw;Philip Kim;Gopa Iyer

Frequent Co-Authors

William C. Hahn
William C. Hahn Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Todd R. Golub
Todd R. Golub Harvard University
David E. Root
David E. Root Broad Institute
Francisca Vazquez
Francisca Vazquez Broad Institute
Aviad Tsherniak
Aviad Tsherniak Broad Institute
Levi A. Garraway
Levi A. Garraway Roche (United States)
Matthew Meyerson
Matthew Meyerson Harvard University
Barbara A. Weir
Barbara A. Weir Janssen (United States)
Gad Getz
Gad Getz Broad Institute
Pablo Tamayo
Pablo Tamayo University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can lead to a wide range of online degree and certificate opportunities, opening up flexible paths into healthcare and laboratory sciences. Many students begin their journey by supportive roles, such as enrolling in medical assistant programs online michigan. These programs offer a solid foundation in patient care, clinical procedures, and medical terminology—skills that are highly transferable.

For those wishing to advance, cma to lpn bridge programs online provide streamlined routes to Licensed Practical Nurse credentials, building on existing medical assistant knowledge. Individuals interested in fast-tracking their science education can benefit from an online biology degree, allowing for flexible, accelerated completion to prepare for various medical laboratory and research roles.

Furthermore, comprehensive online nursing programs equip students with advanced patient care expertise and open doors to leadership positions in healthcare. Whether you envision yourself in direct patient care, biomedical research, or clinical lab work, these online pathways can support your professional goals while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse S. Boehm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles