World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 83 431 408 10 10 290 32737
Biology and Biochemistry 90 2397 2192 171 160 349 37456

Julio Saez-Rodriguez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julio Saez-Rodriguez between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julio Saez-Rodriguez published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2021. 53 of the 567 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2021. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 66 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 60 publications 2024: 56 publications 2025: 52 publications 2026: 1 publication
1985 2026

567 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julio Saez-Rodriguez: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 7
2005 6
2006 6
2007 2
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 5
2012 16
2013 18
2014 17
2015 23
2016 18
2017 22
2018 33
2019 37
2020 48
2021 66
2022 52
2023 60
2024 56
2025 52
2026 1
Total 567
Download as CSV

Julio Saez-Rodriguez publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julio Saez-Rodriguez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 288–297 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 290 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203 290
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Julio Saez-Rodriguez D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julio Saez-Rodriguez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26 83
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Julio Saez-Rodriguez is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and focuses their research on several areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong presence in medicine. Their work encompasses a range of topics, including bioinformatics and genomic networks, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, gene regulatory network analysis, and computational drug discovery methods.

The scientist has contributed extensively to molecular biology, immunology, and cancer research, with significant publications also related to computational theory and mathematics and biophysics. Their research topics reflect interests in gene expression and cancer classification, cell image analysis techniques, and the interplay between cancer, hypoxia, and metabolism.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Julio Saez-Rodriguez illustrate their involvement in cutting-edge research across various domains:

  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, 2020, Cell
  • Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities, 2023, Nature Reviews Genetics
  • decoupleR: ensemble of computational methods to infer biological activities from omics data, 2022, Bioinformatics Advances
  • Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis, 2020, Nature
  • Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction, 2022, Nature

Frequent co-authors highlight ongoing collaborations within their research network. These include Aurélien Dugourd, Ricardo O. Ramirez Flores, Jovan Tanevski, Rafael Kramann, and Christoph Kuppe, with whom they have worked on multiple publications.

  • Aurélien Dugourd
  • Ricardo O. Ramirez Flores
  • Jovan Tanevski
  • Rafael Kramann
  • Christoph Kuppe

Several key publication venues have featured their work, demonstrating engagement with both early-stage research and high-impact journals.

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications
  • Molecular Systems Biology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Julio Saez-Rodriguez's publications and collaborations establish them as an active researcher across experimental and computational biology fields, with a focus on integrating omics data and computational methods to better understand biological systems and disease mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells

    Mathew J. Garnett;Elena J. Edelman;Sonja J. Heidorn;Christopher Greenman;Christopher Greenman

  • Prospective Derivation of a Living Organoid Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patients

    Marc van de Wetering;Hayley E. Francies;Joshua M. Francis;Joshua M. Francis;Gergana Bounova

  • A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer

    Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Daniel J. Vis;Graham R. Bignell

  • Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens

    Fiona M. Behan;Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Gabriele Picco;Emanuel Gonçalves

  • Perturbation-response genes reveal signaling footprints in cancer gene expression.

    Michael Schubert;Bertram Klinger;Martina Klünemann;Martina Klünemann;Anja Sieber;Anja Sieber

  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Mehdi Bouhaddou;Danish Memon;Bjoern Meyer;Kris M. White

  • Benchmark and integration of resources for the estimation of human transcription factor activities.

    Luz Garcia-Alonso;Christian H. Holland;Mahmoud M. Ibrahim;Denes Turei;Denes Turei

  • A CRISPR Dropout Screen Identifies Genetic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Targets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Konstantinos Tzelepis;Hiroko Koike-Yusa;Etienne De Braekeleer;Yilong Li

  • Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis

    Christoph Kuppe;Mahmoud M. Ibrahim;Mahmoud M. Ibrahim;Jennifer Kranz;Jennifer Kranz;Xiaoting Zhang

  • OmniPath: guidelines and gateway for literature-curated signaling pathway resources

    Dénes Türei;Tamás Korcsmáros;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Julio Saez-Rodriguez

  • Structural and functional analysis of cellular networks with CellNetAnalyzer

    Steffen Klamt;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Ernst Dieter Gilles

  • Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Drugs Based on Genomic and Chemical Properties

    Michael P. Menden;Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Mathew Garnett;Ultan McDermott

  • Fumarate is an epigenetic modifier that elicits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

    Marco Sciacovelli;Emanuel Gonçalves;Timothy Isaac Johnson;Vincent Roberto Zecchini

  • Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets

    Nicolas Stransky;Mahmoud Ghandi

  • Towards a Rigorous Assessment of Systems Biology Models: The DREAM3 Challenges

    Robert J. Prill;Daniel Marbach;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Peter Karl Sorger;Peter Karl Sorger

  • A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks

    Steffen Klamt;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Jonathan A. Lindquist;Luca Simeoni

  • Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity

    Matthew T Weirauch;Atina Cote;Raquel Norel;Matti Annala

  • A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling

    Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Luca Simeoni;Jonathan A. Lindquist;Rebecca Hemenway

  • Discrete logic modelling as a means to link protein signalling networks with functional analysis of mammalian signal transduction

    Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Leonidas G Alexopoulos;Leonidas G Alexopoulos;Jonathan Epperlein;Regina Samaga

  • Logic-Based Models for the Analysis of Cell Signaling Networks

    Melody K. Morris;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Julio Saez-Rodriguez;Peter Karl Sorger;Peter Karl Sorger;Douglas A. Lauffenburger

  • Fumarate is an epigenetic modifier that elicits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (vol 537, pg 544, 2016)

    M Sciacovelli;E Goncalves;TI Johnson;VR Zecchini

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathew J. Garnett
Mathew J. Garnett Wellcome Sanger Institute
Peter K. Sorger
Peter K. Sorger Harvard University
Ultan McDermott
Ultan McDermott AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Steffen Klamt
Steffen Klamt Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Claudine Chaouiya
Claudine Chaouiya Aix-Marseille University
Graham R. Bignell
Graham R. Bignell Wellcome Sanger Institute
Julio R. Banga
Julio R. Banga Spanish National Research Council
Oliver Stegle
Oliver Stegle German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Today’s digital learning landscape offers more ways than ever to grow your career in Engineering and Technology. Online programs cater to a range of students, from working professionals to parents seeking flexible options. For instance, those interested in city infrastructure and sustainability can explore a masters in urban planning online, combining technical skills with forward-thinking strategies for modern cities.

Time is a critical factor for many. If you’re looking to accelerate your academic journey, several 6 month masters degree options let you upskill rapidly and enter the workforce sooner.

Not everyone needs a traditional four-year degree to command a strong salary. Plenty of high paying certificate jobs exist in technology, engineering, and related sectors, letting you specialize quickly and cost-effectively.

For busy parents, online education offers the flexibility to balance studies with family life. Consider an online school for moms to find programs designed to support your unique needs as you advance or change careers.

Best Scientists Citing Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles