World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
43166
World Ranking
9946
National Ranking
758

Mathew J. Garnett publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew J. Garnett sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 440 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mathew J. Garnett D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathew J. Garnett sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathew J. Garnett is affiliated with the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research output spans significant contributions in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with particular focus on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, Genetics, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work emphasizes several main topics, including:

  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Among the recent publications associated with Mathew J. Garnett are:

  • High-content CRISPR screening, 2022, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Effective drug combinations in breast, colon and pancreatic cancer cells, 2022, Nature
  • Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer, 2021, Nature Communications
  • High-content CRISPR screening, 2022, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Pan-cancer proteomic map of 949 human cell lines, 2022, Cancer Cell

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Emanuel Gonçalves, Howard Lightfoot, Matthew A. Coelho, Patricia Jaaks, and Syd Barthorpe, each appearing repeatedly in joint publications.

Mathew J. Garnett's publications appear predominantly in these venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Nature Communications
  • Cancer Discovery
  • Cancer Cell

Best Publications

  • Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

    Helen Davies;Graham R. Bignell;Charles Cox;Philip Stephens

  • Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells

    Wanjuan Yang;Jorge Soares;Patricia Greninger;Elena J. Edelman

  • Mechanism of Activation of the Raf-Erk Signaling Pathway by Oncogenic Mutations of B-Raf

    Paul T.C Wan;Mathew J Garnett;S.Mark Roe;Sharlene Lee

  • Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells

    Mathew J. Garnett;Elena J. Edelman;Sonja J. Heidorn;Christopher Greenman;Christopher Greenman

  • Prospective Derivation of a Living Organoid Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patients

    Marc van de Wetering;Hayley E. Francies;Joshua M. Francis;Joshua M. Francis;Gergana Bounova

  • A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer

    Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Daniel J. Vis;Graham R. Bignell

  • Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens

    Fiona M. Behan;Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Gabriele Picco;Emanuel Gonçalves

  • Human primary liver cancer–derived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening

    Laura Broutier;Gianmarco Mastrogiovanni;Monique M.A. Verstegen;Hayley E. Francies

  • Guilty as charged: B-RAF is a human oncogene

    Mathew J. Garnett;Richard Marais

  • Perturbation-response genes reveal signaling footprints in cancer gene expression.

    Michael Schubert;Bertram Klinger;Martina Klünemann;Martina Klünemann;Anja Sieber;Anja Sieber

  • Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Drugs Based on Genomic and Chemical Properties

    Michael P. Menden;Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Mathew Garnett;Ultan McDermott

  • Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets

    Nicolas Stransky;Mahmoud Ghandi

  • MED12 Controls the Response to Multiple Cancer Drugs through Regulation of TGF-β Receptor Signaling.

    Sidong Huang;Michael Hölzel;Theo Knijnenburg;Andreas Schlicker

  • Wild-Type and Mutant B-RAF Activate C-RAF through Distinct Mechanisms Involving Heterodimerization

    Mathew J. Garnett;Sareena Rana;Hugh Paterson;David Barford

  • A Biobank of Breast Cancer Explants with Preserved Intra-tumor Heterogeneity to Screen Anticancer Compounds.

    Alejandra Bruna;Oscar M. Rueda;Wendy Greenwood;Ankita Sati Batra

  • ETV6-NTRK3 Gene Fusions and Trisomy 11 Establish a Histogenetic Link between Mesoblastic Nephroma and Congenital Fibrosarcoma

    S. R. Knezevich;M. J. Garnett;T. J. Pysher;J. B. Beckwith

  • Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance

    Maria Secrier;Xiaodun Li;Nadeera de Silva;Matthew D Eldridge

  • Characterizing Mutational Signatures in Human Cancer Cell Lines Reveals Episodic APOBEC Mutagenesis.

    Mia Petljak;Ludmil B Alexandrov;Jonathan S Brammeld;Stacey Price

  • Pancreatic cancer organoids recapitulate disease and allow personalized drug screening

    Else Driehuis;Arne van Hoeck;Kat Moore;Sigrid Kolders

  • Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance (vol 48, pg 1131, 2016)

    Maria Secrier;Xiaodun Li;Nadeera de Silva;Matthew D Eldridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Ultan McDermott
Ultan McDermott AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Julio Saez-Rodriguez Heidelberg University
Cyril H. Benes
Cyril H. Benes Harvard University
Kosuke Yusa
Kosuke Yusa Kyoto University
Graham R. Bignell
Graham R. Bignell Wellcome Sanger Institute
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Michael R. Stratton
Michael R. Stratton Wellcome Sanger Institute
Olivier Elemento
Olivier Elemento Cornell University
Wafik S. El-Deiry
Wafik S. El-Deiry Brown University
Daniel A. Haber
Daniel A. Haber Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees connected to Biology and Biochemistry can open new doors for your career. For those interested in healthcare, programs like the 12-month fnp program online offer a fast track for advanced nursing professionals. If you have a passion for nutrition, several online dietetics programs can help you move into rewarding roles like registered dietitian or nutritionist.

Many students in Biology or Biochemistry also consider nursing. The easiest rn to bsn online program options help RNs efficiently advance their credentials and take on more responsibilities. Leadership is another pathway to consider; the online masters healthcare management programs can prepare you for management roles in the healthcare sector.

Whether you’re aiming for direct patient care, nutrition, or healthcare leadership, these flexible online programs offer a bridge between your studies and real-world careers in science and health.

Best Scientists Citing Mathew J. Garnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles