World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
6501
World Ranking
8325
National Ranking
383

Douglas E. J. Worthy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas E. J. Worthy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Douglas E. J. Worthy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas E. J. Worthy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas E. J. Worthy is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada, where their research focuses on environmental and atmospheric sciences. Their work spans several key fields, including Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, reflecting a broad engagement with the physical and chemical dynamics of the atmosphere and environment.

Worthy's research concentrates on specific subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. This multidisciplinary approach supports detailed studies of atmospheric processes and their interaction with environmental factors.

The scientist's main research topics include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and Climate Change and Permafrost. These topics highlight their focus on the behavior and impact of gases and aerosols in the atmosphere, as well as related geological and environmental systems.

Worthy has contributed articles to several notable scientific journals. Their recent publications include:

  • Eight-Year Estimates of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Western Canada Are Nearly Twice Those Reported in Inventories, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Technical note: A high-resolution inverse modelling technique for estimating surface CO 2 fluxes based on the NIES-TM-FLEXPART coupled transport model and its adjoint, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • RADIOCARBON IN GLOBAL TROPOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE, 2021, Radiocarbon
  • Estimating methane emissions in the Arctic nations using surface observations from 2008 to 2019, 2023, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Most of Worthy's publications appear in the following journals:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Remote Sensing
  • Radiocarbon
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Frequent collaborators include Felix Vogel, Michel Ramonet, R. L. Langenfelds, Elton Chan, and Douglas Chan, demonstrating ongoing partnerships in research projects and publications.

Best Publications

  • An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker

    Wouter Peters;A. R. Jacobson;C. Sweeney;A. E. Andrews

  • Rising atmospheric methane: 2007-2014 growth and isotopic shift

    E. G. Nisbet;E. J. Dlugokencky;M. R. Manning;D. Lowry

  • CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements

    F. Chevallier;P. Ciais;T. J. Conway;T. Aalto

  • Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14CO2

    Ingeborg Levin;Tobias Naegler;Bernd Kromer;Moritz Diehl

  • Global CO 2 fluxes estimated from GOSAT retrievals of total column CO 2

    S. Basu;S. Basu;S. Guerlet;A. Butz;S. Houweling;S. Houweling

  • CarbonTracker-CH 4 : an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane

    L. M. Bruhwiler;E. Dlugokencky;K. Masarie;M. Ishizawa

  • Verification of German methane emission inventories and their recent changes based on atmospheric observations

    Ingeborg Levin;Holger Glatzel-Mattheier;Thomas Marik;Matthias Cuntz

  • The global SF6 source inferred from long-term high precision atmospheric measurements and its comparison with emission inventories

    I. Levin;T. Naegler;R. Heinz;D. Osusko

  • The role of scavenging in the seasonal transport of black carbon and sulfate to the Arctic

    Timothy J. Garrett;Sara Brattström;Sangeeta Sharma;Douglas E. J. Worthy

  • Is the Arctic Surface Layer a Source and Sink of NOx in Winter/Spring?

    B. Ridley;J. Walega;D. Montzka;F. Grahek

  • Isotope analysis based source identification for atmospheric CH4 and CO sampled across Russia using the Trans-Siberian railroad

    P. Bergamaschi;C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer;M. Hahn;T. Röckmann

  • Analysis of long‐range transport events at Alert, Northwest Territories, during the Polar Sunrise Experiment

    D. E. J. Worthy;N. B. A. Trivett;J. F. Hopper;J. W. Bottenheim

  • Eight-Year Estimates of Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Western Canada Are Nearly Twice Those Reported in Inventories.

    Elton Chan;Douglas E J Worthy;Douglas Chan;Misa Ishizawa

  • Magnitude and seasonality of wetland methane emissions from the Hudson Bay Lowlands (Canada)

    C. A. Pickett-Heaps;C. A. Pickett-Heaps;D. J. Jacob;K. J. Wecht;E. A. Kort

  • Global CO2 fluxes inferred from surface air-sample measurements and from TCCON retrievals of the CO2 total column

    F. Chevallier;N. M. Deutscher;N. M. Deutscher;T. J. Conway;P. Ciais

  • Atmospheric chemistry of formaldehyde in the Arctic troposphere at Polar Sunrise, and the influence of the snowpack

    A.L Sumner;P.B Shepson;A.M Grannas;J.W Bottenheim

  • Western European N2O emissions: A top-down approach based on atmospheric observations

    Martina Schmidt;Holger Glatzel-Mattheier;Hartmut Sartorius;Douglas E. Worthy

  • Inverse modeling of CO2 sources and sinks using satellite observations of CO2 from TES and surface flask measurements

    R. Nassar;R. Nassar;D. B. A. Jones;S. S. Kulawik;J. R. Worden

  • Ten years of atmospheric methane observations at a high elevation site in Western China

    L.X. Zhou;D.E.J. Worthy;P.M. Lang;M.K. Ernst

  • Seven years of continuous methane observations at a remote boreal site in Ontario, Canada

    D. E. J. Worthy;I. Levin;N. B. A. Trivett;A. J. Kuhlmann

  • Evidence for a link between climate and northern wetland methane emissions

    Douglas E. J. Worthy;Ingeborg Levin;Fred Hopper;Michele K. Ernst

  • Global Methane Budget 2000-2012

    M. Saunois;P. Bousquet;B. Poulter;A. Peregon

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Arlyn E. Andrews
Arlyn E. Andrews National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ingeborg Levin
Ingeborg Levin Heidelberg University
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jing M. Chen
Jing M. Chen University of Toronto
John B. Miller
John B. Miller National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ray L. Langenfelds
Ray L. Langenfelds Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paul B. Krummel
Paul B. Krummel Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Toshinobu Machida
Toshinobu Machida National Institute for Environmental Studies
Lori Bruhwiler
Lori Bruhwiler National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students start with a low cost online general studies degree to build foundational knowledge without breaking the bank.

If you're seeking a degree with a more straightforward path, consider programs highlighted among the easiest bachelor's degree to get. These options often allow flexible pacing, which suits busy learners balancing work and study.

Specializations in the environmental field include strong options like online geology programs. These degrees dive deep into earth sciences, crucial for understanding environmental processes and natural resource management.

Moreover, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is highly valued in environmental careers. Exploring the best gis undergraduate programs can provide the technical skills needed for mapping, data analysis, and spatial problem-solving.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas E. J. Worthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles