World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
18091
World Ranking
2874
National Ranking
36

Shamil Maksyutov publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shamil Maksyutov sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 409 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Shamil Maksyutov D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shamil Maksyutov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shamil Maksyutov is affiliated with the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a substantial body of work spanning 55 publications in environmental science and 35 in earth and planetary sciences.

Their scientific contributions include work across several subfields, notably global and planetary change, atmospheric science, environmental chemistry, mechanics of materials, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. This broad range includes extensive research in global and planetary change and atmospheric science, where they have published 43 and 34 papers respectively.

Maksyutov's research covers multiple scientific topics with a strong emphasis on atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric ozone and climate. Other thematic areas of their work include methane hydrates and related phenomena, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, climate variability and models, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Earth system science data
  • Remote Sensing
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Maksyutov has collaborated extensively with co-authors such as Rajesh Janardanan, Tsuneo Matsunaga, Prabir K. Patra, Yukio Yoshida, and Frédéric Chevallier, reflecting a network of scientific partnerships that have produced multiple studies in their field.

Selected recent papers provide insight into their research focus on atmospheric gases and climate systems:

  • The Global Methane Budget 2000-2017, 2020, NOAA Institutional Repository
  • Global Carbon Budget 2024, 2025, Earth system science data
  • National CO 2 budgets (2015-2020) inferred from atmospheric CO 2 observations in support of the global stocktake, 2023, Earth system science data
  • Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Global and Regional CH4 Emissions for 1995-2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH4, δ13C-CH4, and δD-CH4 Observations and a Chemical Transport Model, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Best Publications

  • The global methane budget 2000–2017

    Marielle Saunois;Ann R. Stavert;Ben Poulter;Philippe Bousquet

  • Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models.

    K. R. Gurney;R. M. Law;A. S. Denning;P. J. Rayner

  • The global methane budget 2000–2012

    Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Ben Poulter;Anna Peregon

  • Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results

    T. Yokota;Y. Yoshida;Nawo Eguchi;Y. Ota

  • The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 , version 2016 (ODIAC2016): a global monthly fossil fuel CO 2 gridded emissions data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions

    Tomohiro Oda;Tomohiro Oda;Shamil Maksyutov;Robert J. Andres

  • A very high-resolution (1 km×1 km) global fossil fuel CO 2 emission inventory derived using a point source database and satellite observations of nighttime lights

    T. Oda;S. Maksyutov

  • TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003

    D. F. Baker;D. F. Baker;Rachel M. Law;Kevin R. Gurney;Kevin R. Gurney;Peter Rayner

  • Transcom 3 inversion intercomparison: Model mean results for the estimation of seasonal carbon sources and sinks

    Kevin Robert Gurney;Rachel M. Law;A. Scott Denning;Peter J. Rayner

  • TransCom 3 CO2 inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information

    Kevin Robert Gurney;Rachel M. Law;A. Scott Denning;Peter J. Rayner

  • TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere

    P. K. Patra;S. Houweling;Maarten Krol;Maarten Krol;P. Bousquet

  • TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2 : Analysis of synoptic-scale variations for the period 2002-2003

    P. K. Patra;R. M. Law;Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;C. RöDenbeck

  • An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory based, eddy covariance and inversion methods

    A. J. Dolman;A. Shvidenko;D. Schepaschenko;P. Ciais

  • 16‐year simulation of Arctic black carbon: Transport, source contribution, and sensitivity analysis on deposition

    S. Sharma;M. Ishizawa;D. Chan;D. Lavoué

  • Regional CO 2 flux estimates for 2009–2010 based on GOSAT and ground-based CO 2 observations

    S. Maksyutov;H. Takagi;V. K. Valsala;V. K. Valsala;M. Saito

  • An intercomparison of inverse models for estimating sources and sinks of CO2 using GOSAT measurements

    S. Houweling;D. Baker;S. Basu;Hartmut Boesch

  • Regional methane emission from West Siberia mire landscapes

    M. Glagolev;M. Glagolev;I. Kleptsova;I. Filippov;S. Maksyutov

  • TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002

    R. M. Law;W. Peters;W. Peters;C. Rödenbeck;C. Aulagnier

  • Role of biomass burning and climate anomalies for land‐atmosphere carbon fluxes based on inverse modeling of atmospheric CO2

    Prabir K. Patra;Misa Ishizawa;Shamil Maksyutov;Takakiyo Nakazawa

  • Continuous measurements of methane from a tower network over Siberia

    M. Sasakawa;K. Shimoyama;T. Machida;N. Tsuda

  • Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000-2012

    Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Ben Poulter;Anna Peregon

  • Global Methane Budget 2000-2012

    M. Saunois;P. Bousquet;B. Poulter;A. Peregon

Frequent Co-Authors

Tomohiro Oda
Tomohiro Oda Universities Space Research Association
Isamu Morino
Isamu Morino National Institute for Environmental Studies
Prabir K. Patra
Prabir K. Patra Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Toshinobu Machida
Toshinobu Machida National Institute for Environmental Studies
Tatsuya Yokota
Tatsuya Yokota National Institute for Environmental Studies
Akihiko Ito
Akihiko Ito University of Tokyo
Tsuneo Matsunaga
Tsuneo Matsunaga National Institute for Environmental Studies
Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sander Houweling
Sander Houweling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Maarten Krol
Maarten Krol Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners prioritize flexibility and affordability, making a budget friendly online general studies degree an attractive option. This pathway offers a broad foundation and can be a stepping stone toward specialized environmental fields.

Those looking for a quicker route to graduation might consider programs featured under the easiest bachelor degree to get. While these programs may require less time or fewer prerequisites, aligning your degree choice with career goals is crucial for long-term success.

For a more focused scientific approach, online degrees in geology and geoscience provide an essential understanding of earth processes and environmental systems. Check out the geology online degree programs, which equip students with practical skills for environmental monitoring and resource management.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a vital role in environmental analysis and planning. The best GIS programs offer specialized training that enhances spatial data analysis competencies, critical for careers in conservation, urban planning, and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Shamil Maksyutov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles