World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
75
Citations
24322
World Ranking
1259
National Ranking
539

John B. Miller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Miller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 273 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

John B. Miller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

John B. Miller is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research spans significant contributions in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on the subfields of Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Mechanics of Materials, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers key topics such as Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Climate variability and models, Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, Fire effects on ecosystems, and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, and Earth System Science Data. Notable frequent co-authors in their collaborations are Luciana V. Gatti, Manuel Gloor, Xin Lan, Luana S. Basso, and Sylvia Michel.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by John B. Miller highlight various aspects of atmospheric science and carbon cycle research. These include:

  • "Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change," 2021, Nature
  • "ATMOSPHERIC RADIOCARBON FOR THE PERIOD 1950-2019," 2021, Radiocarbon
  • "Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using δ13C-CH4," 2021, Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • "Estimating US fossil fuel CO 2 emissions from measurements of 14 C in atmospheric CO 2," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Carbon Monitoring System Flux Net Biosphere Exchange 2020 (CMS-Flux NBE 2020)," 2021, Earth System Science Data

Best Publications

  • Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability

    P. Bousquet;P. Bousquet;P. Ciais;J. B. Miller;J. B. Miller;E. J. Dlugokencky

  • An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker

    Wouter Peters;A. R. Jacobson;C. Sweeney;A. E. Andrews

  • Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years

    A. P. Ballantyne;C. B. Alden;J. B. Miller;J. B. Miller;P. P. Tans

  • Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change

    Luciana V Gatti;Luana S Basso;John B Miller;Manuel Gloor

  • 21st Century drought-related fires counteract the decline of Amazon deforestation carbon emissions

    Luiz E. O. C. Aragão;Luiz E. O. C. Aragão;Liana O. Anderson;Marisa G. Fonseca;Thais M. Rosan

  • Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden

    E. J. Dlugokencky;L. Bruhwiler;J. W. C. White;L. K. Emmons

  • Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

    Scot M. Miller;Steven C. Wofsy;Anna M. Michalak;Eric A. Kort

  • Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database

    Stefan Schwietzke;Owen A. Sherwood;Lori M. P. Bruhwiler;John B. Miller;John B. Miller

  • Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements

    L. V. Gatti;M. Gloor;J. B. Miller;C. E. Doughty

  • Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study

    Gabrielle Pétron;Gabrielle Pétron;Gregory Frost;Gregory Frost;Benjamin R. Miller;Benjamin R. Miller;Adam I. Hirsch;Adam I. Hirsch

  • Atmospheric methane levels off: Temporary pause or a new steady-state?

    E. J. Dlugokencky;S. Houweling;L. Bruhwiler;K. A. Masarie

  • Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution

    Betsy A. Read;Jessica Kegel;Mary J. Klute;Alan Kuo

  • Rising atmospheric methane: 2007-2014 growth and isotopic shift

    E. G. Nisbet;E. J. Dlugokencky;M. R. Manning;D. Lowry

  • A 21st century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4

    Hinrich Schaefer;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Cordelia Veidt;Keith R. Lassey

  • Inverse Modeling of Global and Regional CH4 Emissions Using SCIAMACHY Satellite Retrievals

    Peter Bergamaschi;Christian Frankenberg;Jan Fokke Meirink;Maarten Krol;Maarten Krol

  • A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion

    R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;F.-M. Bréon;P. Ciais

  • ATMOSPHERIC RADIOCARBON FOR THE PERIOD 1950–2019

    Quan Hua;Jocelyn C Turnbull;Guaciara M Santos;Andrzej Z Rakowski

  • A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations

    Xuhui Wang;Shilong Piao;Philippe Ciais;Pierre Friedlingstein

  • Unexpected changes to the global methane budget over the past 2000 years.

    D. F. Ferretti;J. B. Miller;J. W. C. White;D. M. Etheridge

  • CH4 sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH4 and its 13C/12C isotopic ratios : 1. Inverse modeling of source processes

    Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Sara E. Mikaloff Fletcher;Pieter P. Tans;Lori M. Bruhwiler;John B. Miller

  • An ensemble data assimilation system to estimate CO2 surface fluxes from atmospheric trace gas observations

    Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;J. B. Miller;J. B. Miller;J. Whitaker;J. Whitaker;A. S. Denning

Frequent Co-Authors

Luciana V. Gatti
Luciana V. Gatti National Institute for Space Research
Wouter Peters
Wouter Peters Wageningen University & Research
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James W. C. White
James W. C. White University of Colorado Boulder
Edward J. Dlugokencky
Edward J. Dlugokencky National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Maarten Krol
Maarten Krol Wageningen University & Research
Pieter P. Tans
Pieter P. Tans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Arlyn E. Andrews
Arlyn E. Andrews National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Scott J. Lehman
Scott J. Lehman Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Anna Karion
Anna Karion National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science, policy, and technology. For students interested in spatial analysis and environmental data, programs like the best GIS programs in the US provide specialized training in Geographic Information Systems, a critical tool for environmental mapping and resource management.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public administration, consider accelerated options such as the 1 year MPA programs. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability and environmental regulation.

Understanding societal behavior is also vital in environmental work. Degrees like the best online bachelor degree in sociology equip students with insights into human-environment interaction and community engagement strategies.

For advanced professionals seeking flexible doctoral education, online options without lengthy dissertation requirements are gaining popularity. Explore doctoral programs online no dissertation to advance your expertise while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing John B. Miller

Trending Scientists