World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 8000 7687 159 156 254 7404

Tatsuya Yokota publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatsuya Yokota between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatsuya Yokota published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2002. 13 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2002. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1982 2025

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatsuya Yokota: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 5
2000 2
2001 5
2002 23
2003 2
2004 8
2005 5
2006 17
2007 8
2008 17
2009 14
2010 17
2011 17
2012 17
2013 19
2014 17
2015 14
2016 16
2017 8
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 9
2023 3
2024 9
2025 4
Total 282
Download as CSV

Tatsuya Yokota publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatsuya Yokota sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 254 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180 254
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatsuya Yokota D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatsuya Yokota sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Tatsuya Yokota is affiliated with the National Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields including Engineering, Computer Science, and Medicine, with a focus on areas such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics Yokota has explored include tensor decomposition and applications, image and signal denoising methods, sparse and compressive sensing techniques, artificial intelligence in cancer detection, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, traffic prediction and management techniques, and advanced image processing techniques.

Yokota has contributed to several publications across respected venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Block Hankel Tensor ARIMA for Multiple Short Time Series Forecasting" (2020), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Matrix and Tensor Completion in Multiway Delay Embedded Space Using Tensor Train, With Application to Signal Reconstruction" (2020), IEEE Signal Processing Letters
  • "Manifold Modeling in Embedded Space: An Interpretable Alternative to Deep Image Prior" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • "Fast Algorithm for Low-rank Tensor Completion in Delay-embedded Space" (2022), 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "Subtype classification of malignant lymphoma using immunohistochemical staining pattern" (2022), International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Their research outputs are also frequently published in forums such as arXiv (Cornell University), the Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), and IEEE journals and conferences.

Yokota collaborates regularly with several co-authors, notably Hidekata Hontani, Andrzej Cichocki, Qibin Zhao, Qiquan Shi, and Hiromu Takayama, reflecting a network that spans expertise in signal processing, tensor methods, and machine learning applications.

Best Publications

  • New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity

    Christian Frankenberg;Joshua B. Fisher;John Worden;Grayson Badgley

  • Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results

    T. Yokota;Y. Yoshida;Nawo Eguchi;Y. Ota

  • Retrieval algorithm for CO 2 and CH 4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse gases observing satellite

    Y. Yoshida;Y. Ota;Y. Ota;N. Eguchi;N. Kikuchi

  • Improvement of the retrieval algorithm for GOSAT SWIR XCO2 and XCH4 and their validation using TCCON data

    Y. Yoshida;N. Kikuchi;I. Morino;O. Uchino

  • Preliminary validation of column-averaged volume mixing ratios of carbon dioxide and methane retrieved from GOSAT short-wavelength infrared spectra

    I. Morino;O. Uchino;M. Inoue;Y. Yoshida

  • The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets

    M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising;Hartmut Boesch

  • Regional CO 2 flux estimates for 2009–2010 based on GOSAT and ground-based CO 2 observations

    S. Maksyutov;H. Takagi;V. K. Valsala;V. K. Valsala;M. Saito

  • Benchmark results in vector atmospheric radiative transfer

    Alexander A. Kokhanovsky;Vladimir P. Budak;Celine Cornet;Minzheng Duan

  • Matrix formulations of radiative transfer including the polarization effect in a coupled atmosphere–ocean system

    Yoshifumi Ota;Akiko Higurashi;Teruyuki Nakajima;Tatsuya Yokota

  • Impact of aerosol and thin cirrus on retrieving and validating XCO2 from GOSAT shortwave infrared measurements

    S. Guerlet;S. Guerlet;A. Butz;D. Schepers;S. Basu

  • Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer (ILAS) for stratospheric ozone layer measurements by solar occultation technique

    Yasuhiro Sasano;Makoto Suzuki;Tatsuya Yokota;Hiroshi Kanzawa

  • On the accuracy of the CO2 surface fluxes to be estimated from the GOSAT observations.

    Frédéric Chevallier;Shamil Maksyutov;Philippe Bousquet;François-Marie Bréon

  • Effects of atmospheric light scattering on spectroscopic observations of greenhouse gases from space: Validation of PPDF‐based CO2 retrievals from GOSAT

    Sergey Oshchepkov;Andrey Bril;Tatsuya Yokota;Isamu Morino

  • Comparing GOSAT observations of localized CO2 enhancements by large emitters with inventory-based estimates

    Rajesh Janardanan;Shamil Maksyutov;Tomohiro Oda;Tomohiro Oda;Makoto Saito

  • GOSAT-2009 methane spectral line list in the 5550-6236 cm -1 range

    A.V. Nikitin;O.M. Lyulin;S.N. Mikhailenko;V.I. Perevalov

  • On the Benefit of GOSAT Observations to the Estimation of Regional CO2 Fluxes

    H. Takagi;T. Saeki;T. Oda;M. Saito

  • Validation of XCO 2 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data

    M. Inoue;I. Morino;O. Uchino;Y. Miyamoto

  • A joint effort to deliver satellite retrieved atmospheric CO 2 concentrations for surface flux inversions: the ensemble median algorithm EMMA

    M. Reuter;H. Bösch;H. Bovensmann;A. Bril

  • Comparison of Cloud-Screening Methods Applied to GOSAT Near-Infrared Spectra

    T. E. Taylor;C. W. O'Dell;D. M. O'Brien;N. Kikuchi

  • Effects of atmospheric light scattering on spectroscopic observations of greenhouse gases from space. Part 2: Algorithm intercomparison in the GOSAT data processing for CO2 retrievals over TCCON sites

    Sergey Oshchepkov;Andrey Bril;Tatsuya Yokota;Paul O. Wennberg

  • Improved Limb Atmospheric Spectrometer (ILAS) data retrieval algorithm for Version 5.20 gas profile products

    T. Yokota;H. Nakajima;T. Sugita;H. Tsubaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Isamu Morino
Isamu Morino National Institute for Environmental Studies
Yasuhiro Sasano
Yasuhiro Sasano National Institute for Environmental Studies
Shamil Maksyutov
Shamil Maksyutov National Institute for Environmental Studies
Tsuneo Matsunaga
Tsuneo Matsunaga National Institute for Environmental Studies
Tomohiro Oda
Tomohiro Oda Universities Space Research Association
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Nicholas M. Deutscher University of Wollongong
Christopher W. O'Dell
Christopher W. O'Dell Colorado State University
Hermann Oelhaf
Hermann Oelhaf Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ralf Sussmann
Ralf Sussmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Kenneth W. Jucks
Kenneth W. Jucks National Aeronautics and Space Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences often opens the door to various interdisciplinary career paths. For students interested in spatial data and mapping technologies, pursuing one of the best GIS programs in the US can provide essential skills in geographic information systems that are crucial for environmental analysis and management.

For professionals aiming to influence public policy or manage environmental programs, a one year MPA program offers a rapid yet comprehensive route to leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important in environmental work. A bachelors degree in sociology online can complement scientific expertise by providing insights into human behavior, community engagement, and environmental justice issues.

For educators and researchers seeking advanced qualifications without the traditional dissertation path, exploring an edd without dissertation can be an attractive option, enabling them to contribute to environmental education and policy development while balancing professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Tatsuya Yokota

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles