World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
13399
World Ranking
5948
National Ranking
2154

Kenneth W. Jucks publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth W. Jucks sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kenneth W. Jucks D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth W. Jucks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth W. Jucks is affiliated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with particular attention to Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Their work also includes Environmental Science, addressing various components of atmospheric composition and dynamics.

The scientist's recent publications include a paper titled "N2O Temporal Variability from the Middle Troposphere to the Middle Stratosphere Based on Airborne and Balloon-Borne Observations during the Period 1987-2018", published in 2023 in the journal Atmosphere. This paper examines the temporal variability of nitrous oxide within atmospheric layers by utilizing airborne and balloon-borne observational data over three decades.

Research topics covered in their work include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols

The scientist frequently collaborates with coauthors such as:

  • Gisèle Krysztofiak
  • Valéry Catoire
  • Thierry Dudok de Wit
  • Douglas E. Kinnison
  • A. R. Ravishankara

Their research has predominantly been published in the journal Atmosphere, which is a significant venue for their scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • THE HITRAN MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPIC DATABASE AND HAWKS (HITRAN ATMOSPHERIC WORKSTATION): 1996 EDITION

    L. S. Rothman;C. P. Rinsland;A. Goldman;S. T. Massie

  • The HITRAN molecular spectroscopic database: edition of 2000 including updates through 2001

    L.S. Rothman;A. Barbe;D. Chris Benner;L.R. Brown

  • The HITRAN molecular spectroscopic database and HAWKS (HITRAN atmospheric workstation)

    Laurence S. Rothman;Curtis P. Rinsland;Aaron Goldman;Steven T. Massie

  • Remote sensing of planetary properties and biosignatures on extrasolar terrestrial planets.

    David J. Des Marais;Martin O. Harwit;Kenneth W. Jucks;James F. Kasting

  • SciENTIFIC AssESSMENT OF OzoNE DEPLETION: 1998

    Daniel L. Albritton;Pieter J. Aucamp;Gerard Megie;Robert T. Watson

  • Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder stratospheric ozone measurements

    L. Froidevaux;Y. B. Jiang;A. Lambert;N. J. Livesey

  • Spectral Evolution of an Earth-like Planet

    Lisa Kaltenegger;Wesley A. Traub;Kenneth W. Jucks

  • Achieving Climate Change Absolute Accuracy in Orbit

    Bruce A. Wielicki;D. F. Young;M. G. Mlynczak;K. J. Thome

  • Early validation analyses of atmospheric profiles from EOS MLS on the aura Satellite

    L. Froidevaux;N.J. Livesey;W.G. Read;Y.B. Jiang

  • Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder middle atmosphere water vapor and nitrous oxide measurements

    Alyn Lambert;W. G. Read;N. J. Livesey;M. L. Santee

  • The Spectrum of Earthshine: A Pale Blue Dot Observed from the Ground

    N. J. Woolf;P. S. Smith;W. A. Traub;K. W. Jucks

  • Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the studies of emissions and atmospheric composition, clouds and climate coupling by regional surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission

    Owen B. Toon;Hal Maring;Jack E. Dibb;Richard Ferrare

  • The structure of the carbon dioxide dimer from near infrared spectroscopy

    K. W. Jucks;Z. S. Huang;D. Dayton;R. E. Miller

  • Geophysical validation of MIPAS-ENVISAT operational ozone data

    U. Cortesi;J. C. Lambert;C. de Clercq;G. Bianchini

  • SPECTRUM OF A HABITABLE WORLD: EARTHSHINE IN THE NEAR-INFRARED

    Margaret C. Turnbull;Margaret C. Turnbull;Wesley A. Traub;Wesley A. Traub;Kenneth W. Jucks;Neville J. Woolf;Neville J. Woolf

  • Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

    E. Dupuy;K.A. Walker;K.A. Walker;J. Kar;C.D. Boone

  • Smithsonian stratospheric far‐infrared spectrometer and data reduction system

    D. G. Johnson;K. W. Jucks;W. A. Traub;K. V. Chance

  • Planning, implementation, and first results of the Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling Experiment (TC4)

    Owen B. Toon;David O. Starr;Eric J. Jensen;Paul A. Newman

  • Validation of the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder ClO measurements

    M. L. Santee;A. Lambert;W. G. Read;N. J. Livesey

  • Validation of CH4 and N2O measurements by the cryogenic limb array etalon spectrometer instrument on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite

    A. E. Roche;J. B. Kumer;R. W. Nightingale;J. L. Mergenthaler

  • Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010

    S. A. Montzka;S. Reimann;A. Engel;K. Kruger

Frequent Co-Authors

Kelly Chance
Kelly Chance Harvard University
Peter F. Bernath
Peter F. Bernath Old Dominion University
G. C. Toon
G. C. Toon California Institute of Technology
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
Ross J. Salawitch
Ross J. Salawitch University of Maryland, College Park
Yasuhiro Sasano
Yasuhiro Sasano National Institute for Environmental Studies
Gloria L. Manney
Gloria L. Manney Northwest Research Associates
Lucien Froidevaux
Lucien Froidevaux California Institute of Technology
Tatsuya Yokota
Tatsuya Yokota National Institute for Environmental Studies
Hermann Oelhaf
Hermann Oelhaf Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens various academic and career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through online education. For those interested in advancing their expertise without the challenge of extensive research work, exploring edd no dissertation programs may be appealing. These programs offer flexibility while emphasizing practical leadership skills important in environmental management roles.

For educators and professionals seeking doctoral credentials, institutions offering best online eds to edd programs provide a clear pathway from a master's to a doctoral degree. Such progression supports careers in environmental education and policy-making.

Social workers focused on environmental justice can consider fully funded dsw programs online, which allow specialization while minimizing financial burden. These programs equip graduates to address social and ecological issues effectively.

Lastly, an accredited affordable online general studies degree can serve as a foundational option for students seeking broad knowledge before specializing. This flexibility supports diverse environmental science careers, including sustainability consulting and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth W. Jucks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles