World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
11443
World Ranking
6998
National Ranking
3400

Lee Osterhout publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Osterhout sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lee Osterhout D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Osterhout sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lee Osterhout is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. This connection marks their involvement in an institution known for its contributions to various scientific fields.

Although specific details about their research papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not available, their academic profile suggests active engagement within the university's research community.

There is no listed information regarding the main fields or subfields of study associated with Lee Osterhout, nor are there details about particular topics of research interest or any book publications.

No awards or honors have been recorded for Lee Osterhout in the data provided.

The absence of detailed publication records or research topics limits a more comprehensive understanding of their scientific contributions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J Holcomb

  • Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree

    Lee Osterhout;Linda A. Mobley

  • The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

    Albert Kim;Lee Osterhout

  • Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences : Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb;David A. Swinney

  • Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change

    Judith McLaughlin;Lee Osterhout;Albert Kim

  • Event related potentials and language comprehension.

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • The neurocognition of syntactic processing

    Peter Hagoort;Colin M. Brown;Lee Osterhout

  • On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies.

    Lee Osterhout;Janet Nicol

  • Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes

    Lee Osterhout;Michael Bersick;Judith Mclaughlin

  • Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing.

    Lee Osterhout;Judith McLaughlin;Ilona Pitkänen;Cheryl Frenck-Mestre

  • Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning

    Judith McLaughlin;Darren Tanner;Ilona Pitkänen;Cheryl Frenck-Mestre

  • Second-language learning and changes in the brain.

    Lee Osterhout;Andrew Poliakov;Kayo Inoue;Judith McLaughlin

  • On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.

    Lee Osterhout

  • On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the p300 family?

    Lee Osterhout;Richard McKinnon;Michael Bersick;Vicka Corey

  • A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate

    Lee Osterhout;Peter Hagoort

  • Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence

    Darren Tanner;Judith Mclaughlin;Julia Herschensohn;Lee Osterhout

  • Morphological Analysis in Sentence Processing: An ERP Study.

    Mark Allen;William Badecker;Lee Osterhout

  • Inference Generation During Auditory Language Comprehension

    David A. Swinney;Lee Osterhout

  • Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension ∗

    Darren Tanner;Kayo Inoue;Lee Osterhout

Frequent Co-Authors

David Swinney
David Swinney University of California, San Diego
Phillip J. Holcomb
Phillip J. Holcomb San Diego State University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
Karen Emmorey
Karen Emmorey San Diego State University
Colin M. Brown
Colin M. Brown Max Planck Society
Walter Mischel
Walter Mischel Columbia University
Yuichi Shoda
Yuichi Shoda University of Washington
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a range of online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those seeking to make a quick transition into advanced roles, one year msw programs offer a fast-track to a Master of Social Work, allowing graduates to enter fields like clinical social work or community services more quickly.

Students interested in mental health and human behavior may consider accelerated psychology programs online, which are designed for faster completion while covering essential concepts and skills. Those aiming for counseling licensure often look for cacrep-accredited online counseling programs, ensuring the quality and recognition needed for professional practice.

For a specialized focus, mft masters programs are ideal for those wishing to support couples and families. Online and accelerated options make it easier than ever to balance your education with other life commitments while preparing for a rewarding career in human services.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Osterhout

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles