World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 33 6998 6498 3400 3099 55 11443

Lee Osterhout publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lee Osterhout between 1989 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lee Osterhout published across 31 years, from 1989 to 2019, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1997. 2 of the 55 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1997. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
1989 2019

55 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lee Osterhout: publications per year, 1989 to 2019
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 5
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 1
2012 4
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 2
Total 55
Download as CSV

Lee Osterhout publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Osterhout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 54–63 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61 55
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lee Osterhout D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Osterhout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188 33
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Lee Osterhout is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. This connection marks their involvement in an institution known for its contributions to various scientific fields.

Although specific details about their research papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not available, their academic profile suggests active engagement within the university's research community.

There is no listed information regarding the main fields or subfields of study associated with Lee Osterhout, nor are there details about particular topics of research interest or any book publications.

No awards or honors have been recorded for Lee Osterhout in the data provided.

The absence of detailed publication records or research topics limits a more comprehensive understanding of their scientific contributions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J Holcomb

  • Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree

    Lee Osterhout;Linda A. Mobley

  • The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

    Albert Kim;Lee Osterhout

  • Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences : Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb;David A. Swinney

  • Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change

    Judith McLaughlin;Lee Osterhout;Albert Kim

  • Event related potentials and language comprehension.

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • The neurocognition of syntactic processing

    Peter Hagoort;Colin M. Brown;Lee Osterhout

  • On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies.

    Lee Osterhout;Janet Nicol

  • Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes

    Lee Osterhout;Michael Bersick;Judith Mclaughlin

  • Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing.

    Lee Osterhout;Judith McLaughlin;Ilona Pitkänen;Cheryl Frenck-Mestre

  • Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning

    Judith McLaughlin;Darren Tanner;Ilona Pitkänen;Cheryl Frenck-Mestre

  • Second-language learning and changes in the brain.

    Lee Osterhout;Andrew Poliakov;Kayo Inoue;Judith McLaughlin

  • On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.

    Lee Osterhout

  • On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the p300 family?

    Lee Osterhout;Richard McKinnon;Michael Bersick;Vicka Corey

  • A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate

    Lee Osterhout;Peter Hagoort

  • Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence

    Darren Tanner;Judith Mclaughlin;Julia Herschensohn;Lee Osterhout

  • Morphological Analysis in Sentence Processing: An ERP Study.

    Mark Allen;William Badecker;Lee Osterhout

  • Inference Generation During Auditory Language Comprehension

    David A. Swinney;Lee Osterhout

  • Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension ∗

    Darren Tanner;Kayo Inoue;Lee Osterhout

Frequent Co-Authors

David Swinney
David Swinney University of California, San Diego
Phillip J. Holcomb
Phillip J. Holcomb San Diego State University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
Karen Emmorey
Karen Emmorey San Diego State University
Colin M. Brown
Colin M. Brown Max Planck Society
Walter Mischel
Walter Mischel Columbia University
Yuichi Shoda
Yuichi Shoda University of Washington
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a range of online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those seeking to make a quick transition into advanced roles, one year msw programs offer a fast-track to a Master of Social Work, allowing graduates to enter fields like clinical social work or community services more quickly.

Students interested in mental health and human behavior may consider accelerated psychology programs online, which are designed for faster completion while covering essential concepts and skills. Those aiming for counseling licensure often look for cacrep-accredited online counseling programs, ensuring the quality and recognition needed for professional practice.

For a specialized focus, mft masters programs are ideal for those wishing to support couples and families. Online and accelerated options make it easier than ever to balance your education with other life commitments while preparing for a rewarding career in human services.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Osterhout

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles