World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
10505
World Ranking
8411
National Ranking
4490

David Swinney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Swinney sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David Swinney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Swinney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Swinney is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic career is positioned within this institution, where they contribute to research and scholarly activities.

There are no records of recent papers published by David Swinney within the current dataset. Therefore, details concerning specific research outputs or recent contributions are not available.

The available data does not list frequent co-authors or indicate collaborators with whom David Swinney has consistently worked. Likewise, there is no information regarding frequent publication venues associated with their academic output.

No book publications are recorded for David Swinney in the present information, indicating that there are no known books published through any academic or commercial publisher under their authorship.

The dataset does not specify the main fields or subfields of study in which David Swinney is active, nor does it provide details on the primary topics of their work.

There are no listed awards attributed to David Swinney within the provided data, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects

    Unknown

  • The access and processing of idiomatic expressions

    David A. Swinney;Anne Cutler

  • The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.

    Janet Nicol;David Swinney

  • Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences : Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing

    Lee Osterhout;Phillip J. Holcomb;David A. Swinney

  • Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias

    William Onifer;David A. Swinney

  • An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia

    E. Zurif;D. Swinney;P. Prather;J. Solomon

  • Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia.

    Michael T. Ullman;Roumyana Pancheva;Roumyana Pancheva;Tracy Love;Eiling Yee;Eiling Yee

  • Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing.

    Colin Humphries;Tracy Love;David Swinney;Gregory Hickok

  • Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences.

    David A. Swinney;William Onifer;Penny Prather;Max Hirshkowitz

  • The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif;Janet Nicol

  • Coreference Processing and Levels of Analysis in Object-Relative Constructions; Demonstration of Antecedent Reactivation with the Cross-Modal Priming Paradigm

    Tracy Love;David Swinney

  • The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: evidence from the elderly.

    Edgar Zurif;David Swinney;Penney Prather;Penney Prather;Arthur Wingfield;Arthur Wingfield

  • Prosody and the development of comprehension

    Anne Cutler;David A. Swinney

  • Inference Generation During Auditory Language Comprehension

    David A. Swinney;Lee Osterhout

  • Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif;Penny Prather;Tracy Love

  • How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia

    Tracy Love;David Swinney;Matthew Walenski;Edgar Zurif

  • Syntactic processing in aphasia.

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif

  • Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing.

    Janet L. Nicol;Janet Dean Fodor;David Swinney

  • Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension.

    David A. Swinney;David T. Hakes

  • Language and the brain : representation and processing

    Yosef Grodzinsky;Lewis P. Shapiro;David Swinney

  • Real-time examinations of lexical processing in aphasics.

    Penny Prather;Lewis Shapiro;Edgar Zurif;Edgar Zurif;David Swinney

  • Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Edgar Zurif
Edgar Zurif Brandeis University
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Gregory Hickok
Gregory Hickok University of California, Irvine
Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Roelien Bastiaanse
Roelien Bastiaanse University of Groningen
Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Hiram Brownell
Hiram Brownell Boston College
Naama Friedmann
Naama Friedmann Tel Aviv University
Phillip J. Holcomb
Phillip J. Holcomb San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and career options, especially in the field of counseling. Online degrees offer flexibility while also providing the essential coursework required for licensure and professional growth. One popular pathway is substance abuse counseling, which calls for both specialized education and a strong sense of purpose.

Requirements for becoming a counselor vary by city and state, affecting your educational and career choices. For instance, discover how to become a substance abuse counselor in Austin to see specific state guidelines and licensure steps. Similarly, you can review the Bakersfield substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Those interested in the East Coast should consider reading about substance abuse counselor requirements in Baltimore. Meanwhile, the Boise substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight differences in prerequisites and certifications. Comparing requirements across regions can help you plan your education and future career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing David Swinney