World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
12950
World Ranking
5147
National Ranking
2834

Gloria Waters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Waters sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gloria Waters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gloria Waters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gloria Waters is a researcher affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research output primarily addresses topics related to Medicine, with a focus on Infectious Diseases, Modeling and Simulation, Clinical Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, and Oncology as subfields. The main areas covered in their work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies, COVID-19 and Mental Health, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Biosensors and Analytical Detection, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, and Infection Control and Ventilation.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Gloria Waters include:

  • Assessment of a COVID-19 Control Plan on an Urban University Campus During a Second Wave of the Pandemic, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Buildout and integration of an automated high-throughput CLIA laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 testing on a large urban campus, 2022, SLAS TECHNOLOGY
  • Detailed Overview of the Buildout and Integration of an Automated High-Throughput CLIA Laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 Testing on a Large Urban Campus, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Control of COVID-19 transmission on an urban university campus during a second wave of the pandemic, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The venues where Gloria Waters most frequently publishes their work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), JAMA Network Open, and SLAS TECHNOLOGY.

They have collaborated extensively with a set of frequent co-authors, including Davidson H. Hamer, Catherine M. Klapperich, Judy Platt, Douglas Densmore, and Lena Landaverde.

Best Publications

  • Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

    David Caplan;Gloria S. Waters

  • When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Marcia A. Barnes;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Michael Sanders;Pearl Langer

  • Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow

    David Caplan;Nathaniel Alpert;Gloria Waters

  • The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension

    Gloria S. Waters;David Caplan

  • The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992)

    Gloria S. Waters;David Caplan

  • Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.

    Gloria S. Waters;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation

    David Caplan;Nathaniel Alpert;Gloria Waters;Anthony Olivieri

  • Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks

    Gloria S. Waters;Mark S. Seidenberg;Margaret Bruck

  • The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures.

    Gloria S. Waters;David Caplan

  • PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation.

    David Caplan;Nathaniel Alpert;Gloria Waters;Gloria Waters

  • The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension

    David Caplan;Gloria Waters

  • Articulatory and Phonological Determinants of Word Length Effects in Span Tasks

    David Caplan;Elizabeth Rochon;Gloria S. Waters

  • Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension.

    Gloria S. Waters;David Caplan

  • A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects

    David Caplan;Gloria Waters;Gayle DeDe;Jennifer Michaud

  • The Relationship Between Age, Verbal Working Memory, and Language Comprehension.

    Gayle DeDe;David Caplan;Karen Kemtes;Gloria Waters

  • Sentence Comprehension in Patients with Alzheimer′s Disease

    E. Rochon;G.S. Waters;D. Caplan

  • Working memory and written sentence comprehension.

    Gloria Waters;David Caplan;Nancy Hildebrandt

  • Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses

    David Caplan;Sujith Vijayan;Gina Kuperberg;Caroline West

  • Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.

    David Caplan;Gayle DeDe;Gloria Waters;Jennifer Michaud

  • Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography

    David Caplan;Nathaniel Alpert;Gloria Waters

Frequent Co-Authors

David Caplan
David Caplan Harvard University
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
Nathaniel M. Alpert
Nathaniel M. Alpert Harvard University
Mark S. Seidenberg
Mark S. Seidenberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Swathi Kiran
Swathi Kiran Boston University
Gina R. Kuperberg
Gina R. Kuperberg Tufts University
Debra Titone
Debra Titone McGill University
Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Maggie Bruck
Maggie Bruck Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, especially when combined with related degrees like social work. With the rise of online learning, students can explore flexible options that align with their interests and professional goals.

Online degrees in psychology and social work not only offer convenient access but also meet the growing demand for qualified professionals in mental health, counseling, and community services. Understanding regional differences is key. For example, the best social work degrees in North Dakota and the best social work degrees in the Northeast offer programs tailored to their communities' unique needs.

Students considering online study should also look at location-based rankings. The best social work degrees in Oklahoma highlight programs that foster both urban and rural engagement, while the top social work programs in Philadelphia provide insights into specialization in city environments.

Whether you choose psychology or a related online degree, these pathways help build essential skills for rewarding roles in healthcare, social advocacy, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Gloria Waters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles