World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6864
World Ranking
9748
National Ranking
5151

Patricia A. Tun publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Tun sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 47 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patricia A. Tun D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Tun sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia A. Tun is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their academic career is associated with this institution, where they contribute to research and scholarship.

Information about their recent published papers is not available. Likewise, there are no listed frequent co-authors or publication venues connected to their work. Details about book publications, fields of study, subfields of study, or primary research topics have not been provided.

No awards or distinctions have been reported in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech

    Sandra L McCoy;Patricia A Tun;L Clarke Cox;Marianne Colangelo

  • Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening.

    Patricia A. Tun;Sandra McCoy;Arthur Wingfield

  • Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood What It Is and How It Interacts With Cognitive Performance

    Arthur Wingfield;Patricia A. Tun;Sandra L. McCoy

  • Response latencies for false memories: gist-based processes in normal aging.

    Patricia A. Tun;Arthur Wingfield;Merri J. Rosen;Lisa Blanchard

  • Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

    Patricia A. Tun;Gail O'Kane;Arthur Wingfield

  • Telephone assessment of cognitive function in adulthood: the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone

    Patricia A. Tun;Margie E. Lachman

  • Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.

    Arthur Wingfield;Sandra L McCoy;Jonathan E Peelle;Patricia A Tun

  • Monitoring cognitive functioning: psychometric properties of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone.

    Margie E. Lachman;Stefan Agrigoroaei;Patricia A. Tun;Suzanne L. Weaver

  • Frequent Cognitive Activity Compensates for Education Differences in Episodic Memory

    Margie E. Lachman;Stefan Agrigoroaei;Chandra Murphy;Patricia A. Tun

  • Histories of Social Engagement and Adult Cognition: Midlife in the U.S. Study

    Teresa E. Seeman;Dana M. Miller-Martinez;Sharon Stein Merkin;Margie E. Lachman

  • Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: education, sex, and task complexity matter.

    Patricia A. Tun;Margie E. Lachman

  • One Voice Too Many: Adult Age Differences in Language Processing With Different Types of Distracting Sounds

    Patricia A. Tun;Arthur Wingfield

  • Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language.

    Arthur Wingfield;Patricia A. Tun

  • Regaining lost time: adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech.

    Arthur Wingfield;Patricia A. Tun;Christine K. Koh;Merri J. Rosen

  • The association between computer use and cognition across adulthood: use it so you won't lose it?

    Patricia A. Tun;Margie E. Lachman

  • Spoken Language Comprehension in Older Adults: Interactions between Sensory and Cognitive Change in Normal Aging

    Arthur Wingfield;Patricia A. Tun

  • Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.

    Jonathan Benichov;L. Clarke Cox;Patricia A. Tun;Arthur Wingfield

  • The Effects of Aging on Auditory Processing and Cognition

    Patricia A. Tun;Victoria A. Williams;Brent J. Small;Ervin R. Hafter

  • Fluid cognitive ability is associated with greater exposure and smaller reactions to daily stressors.

    Robert S. Stawski;David M. Almeida;Margie E. Lachman;Patricia A. Tun

  • Cognitive and affective disorders in elderly diabetics.

    Patricia A. Tun;David M. Nathan;Lawrence C. Perlmuter;Lawrence C. Perlmuter

  • Biological correlates of adult cognition: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS)

    Arun S. Karlamangla;Dana Miller-Martinez;Margie E. Lachman;Patricia A. Tun

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Margie E. Lachman
Margie E. Lachman Brandeis University
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles
Matthew M. Burg
Matthew M. Burg Yale University
David M. Nathan
David M. Nathan Harvard University
David M. Almeida
David M. Almeida Pennsylvania State University
Carol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert S. Stawski
Robert S. Stawski Utah State University
Richard P. Sloan
Richard P. Sloan Columbia University
Gloria Waters
Gloria Waters Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there are many related online degrees that can open doors in counseling, therapy, and social services. Online study provides flexibility and access for students unable to attend campus-based programs, making it easier to balance personal responsibilities with academic ambitions.

Social work is a popular career pathway for psychology graduates, and many universities now offer affordable online social work master's programs in Texas for those looking to specialize in this rewarding field. Additionally, students across the country can explore the most affordable online master's in social work degree programs in USA, making entry into this profession more accessible than ever.

State-specific options, such as the cheapest online social work programs in Ohio and affordable online social work degrees in Tennessee, help future professionals tailor their education to local licensure requirements and community needs. Exploring these affordable programs empowers you to pursue meaningful careers while managing educational costs.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Tun

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles