World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Michael G. Stabin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Stabin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael G. Stabin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Stabin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael G. Stabin is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States, focusing on research primarily within the field of medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, notably radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, radiation, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, economics and econometrics, and surgery.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Radiopharmaceutical chemistry and applications
  • Radiation dose and imaging
  • Radioactive decay and measurement techniques
  • Advanced radiotherapy techniques
  • Medical imaging techniques and applications
  • Statistical methods in clinical trials
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

The primary publication venues where Michael G. Stabin frequently publishes are:

  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Health Physics
  • EJNMMI Research
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by the scientist include:

  • "Comparison of absorbed dose extrapolation methods for mouse-to-human translation of radiolabelled macromolecules," 2022, EJNMMI Research
  • "OLINDA/EXM 2-The Next-generation Personal Computer Software for Internal Dose Assessment in Nuclear Medicine," 2023, Health Physics
  • "RADAR Guide: Standard Methods for Calculating Radiation Doses for Radiopharmaceuticals, Part 1-Collection of Data for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry," 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "RADAR Guide: Standard Methods for Calculating Radiation Doses for Radiopharmaceuticals, Part 2-Data Analysis and Dosimetry," 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Oral Administration of 99mTechnetium-Labeled Heparin in Eosinophilic Esophagitis," 2020, Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Richard E. Wendt
  • Glenn Flux
  • Francesco Cicone
  • David Viertl
  • Thibaut Denoël

Best Publications

  • OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

    Michael G Stabin;Richard B Sparks;Eric Crowe

  • Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007.

    Fred A. Mettler;Mythreyi Bhargavan;Keith Faulkner;Debbie B. Gilley

  • MIRDOSE: Personal Computer Software for Internal Dose Assessment in Nuclear Medicine

    Michael G. Stabin

  • Procedure Guideline for Tumor Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0

    Dominique Delbeke;R. Edward Coleman;Milton J. Guiberteau;Manuel L. Brown

  • MIRD pamphlet no. 16: Techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates.

    Jeffry A. Siegel;Stephen R. Thomas;James B. Stubbs;Michael G. Stabin

  • Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment.

    Michael G Stabin;Jeffry A Siegel

  • SNM Practice Guideline for Sodium 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans 1.0

    George Segall;Dominique Delbeke;Michael G. Stabin;Einat Even-Sapir

  • Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals: a Compendium of Current Information Related to Frequently Used Substances.

    S. Mattsson;L. Johansson;S. Leide-Svegborn;J. Liniecki

  • Phase I/II 90Y-Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, IDEC-Y2B8) radioimmunotherapy dosimetry results in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

    Gregory A. Wiseman;Christine A. White;Michael Stabin;William L. Dunn

  • The SNMMI Practice Guideline for Therapy of Thyroid Disease with 131I 3.0

    Edward B. Silberstein;Abass Alavi;Helena R. Balon;Susan E.M. Clarke

  • Radiation Dosimetry Results and Safety Correlations from 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Combined Data from 4 Clinical Trials

    Gregory A. Wiseman;Ellen Kornmehl;Bryan Leigh;William D. Erwin

  • Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on dosimetry, imaging, and quality assurance procedures for 90Y microsphere brachytherapy in the treatment of hepatic malignancies

    William A. Dezarn;Jeffery T. Cessna;Larry A. DeWerd;Wenzheng Feng

  • Samarium-153-EDTMP biodistribution and dosimetry estimation.

    Janet F. Eary;Carolyn Collins;Michael Stabin;Cheryl Vernon

  • First-in-Man Evaluation of 2 High-Affinity PSMA-Avid Small Molecules for Imaging Prostate Cancer

    John A. Barrett;R. Edward Coleman;Stanley J. Goldsmith;Shankar Vallabhajosula

  • Synthesis and evaluation of [18F]1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid to image brain tumors.

    Timothy M. Shoup;Jeffrey Olson;John M. Hoffman;John Votaw

  • Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the nonpregnant adult female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy

    M.G. Stabin;E.E. Watson;M. Cristy;J.C. Ryman

  • SNMMI/ASNC/SCCT Guideline for Cardiac SPECT/CT and PET/CT 1.0

    Sharmila Dorbala;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Dominique Delbeke;Suhny Abbara

  • Safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 123I-IMPY: a novel amyloid plaque-imaging agent for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

    Andrew B Newberg;Nancy A Wintering;Karl Plössl;John Hochold

  • Technetium-99m ECD: a new brain imaging agent: in vivo kinetics and biodistribution studies in normal human subjects.

    Shankar Vallabhajosula;Robert E. Zimmerman;Michel Picard;Peter Stritzke

  • Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals

    Sören Mattsson;Lennart Johansson;J Liniecki;D Nosske

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Kennel
Stephen J. Kennel University of Tennessee Medical Center
Robert M. Sharkey
Robert M. Sharkey University of Fukui
John W. Babich
John W. Babich Cornell University
Stanley J. Goldsmith
Stanley J. Goldsmith Cornell University
R. Edward Coleman
R. Edward Coleman Duke University
Barry A. Siegel
Barry A. Siegel Washington University in St. Louis
Martin W. Brechbiel
Martin W. Brechbiel National Institutes of Health
John L. Neumeyer
John L. Neumeyer Harvard University
Hank F. Kung
Hank F. Kung University of Pennsylvania
Michael Kassiou
Michael Kassiou University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare and medicine can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers. For nursing professionals, flexibility and affordability are key considerations. Many students look for the cheapest rn to bsn program online to advance their qualifications without accumulating excessive debt.

For those with a bachelor's degree in another field who aspire to a nursing career, there are msn direct entry programs online that streamline the process and help you earn a master’s degree efficiently. If gaining admission feels daunting, there are also easy nursing programs to get into that consider a broad range of applicants, making the dream of practicing nursing more attainable.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care or years of medical school. Those seeking roles in healthcare administration may be interested in medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid. These programs offer flexible entry into the healthcare field and can lead to a stable, in-demand career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael G. Stabin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles