World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
36638
World Ranking
5836
National Ranking
3134

Jason S. Lewis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason S. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 548 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jason S. Lewis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason S. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jason S. Lewis is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the fields of Medicine, with key subfields spanning Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Surgery.

The main topics of Jason S. Lewis's work cover Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations.

The frequent publication venues where their work has appeared include:

  • Nuclear Medicine and Biology
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Jason S. Lewis has collaborated regularly with a number of co-authors, specifically:

  • Lukas M. Carter
  • Serge K. Lyashchenko
  • Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty
  • Edwin C. Pratt
  • David Bauer

Notable recent papers co-authored or associated with Jason S. Lewis include:

  • Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities, 2022, published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • Radiotheranostics: a roadmap for future development, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • HER2-Mediated Internalization of Cytotoxic Agents in ERBB2 Amplified or Mutant Lung Cancers, 2020, Cancer Discovery
  • Tim-4+ cavity-resident macrophages impair anti-tumor CD8+ T cell immunity, 2021, Cancer Cell

Best Publications

  • Superparamagnetic iron oxide: Pharmacokinetics and toxicity

    R. Weissleder;D. D. Stark;B. L. Engelstad;B. R. Bacon

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Hypoxia: Importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy

    Jeffrey M. Arbeit;J. Martin Brown;K. S.Clifford Chao;J. Donald Chapman

  • A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

    K.S.Clifford Chao;Walter R Bosch;Sasa Mutic;Jason S Lewis

  • Copper radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine

    Philip J. Blower;Philip J. Blower;Jason S. Lewis;Jamal Zweit

  • 89Zr-DFO-J591 for ImmunoPET of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression In Vivo

    Jason P. Holland;Vadim Divilov;Neil H. Bander;Peter M. Smith-Jones

  • Standardized methods for the production of high specific-activity zirconium-89

    Jason P. Holland;Yiauchung Sheh;Jason S. Lewis

  • In vivo assessment of tumor hypoxia in lung cancer with 60Cu-ATSM

    Farrokh Dehdashti;Mark A. Mintun;Jason S. Lewis;Jeffrey Bradley

  • PET Imaging with 89Zr: From Radiochemistry to the Clinic

    Melissa A. Deri;Brian M. Zeglis;Lynn C. Francesconi;Jason S. Lewis

  • Assessing tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer by positron emission tomography with 60Cu-ATSM: relationship to therapeutic response-a preliminary report.

    Farrokh Dehdashti;Perry W Grigsby;Mark A Mintun;Jason S Lewis

  • Evaluation of 64Cu-ATSM In Vitro and In Vivo in a Hypoxic Tumor Model

    Jason S. Lewis;Deborah W. McCarthy;Timothy J. McCarthy;Yasuhisa Fujibayashi

  • Metal complexes as diagnostic tools

    David E. Reichert;Jason S. Lewis;Carolyn J. Anderson

  • PI3K inhibition results in enhanced estrogen receptor function and dependence in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

    Ana Bosch;Zhiqiang Li;Anna Bergamaschi;Haley Ellis

  • Imaging oxygenation of human tumours

    Anwar R Padhani;Kenneth A. Krohn;Jason S Lewis;Markus L Alber

  • 64Cu-TETA-Octreotide as a PET Imaging Agent for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

    C J Anderson;F Dehdashti;P D Cutler;S W Schwarz

  • Cu–ATSM: A radiopharmaceutical for the PET imaging of hypoxia

    Amy L. Vāvere;Jason S. Lewis

  • Glutamine-based PET imaging facilitates enhanced metabolic evaluation of gliomas in vivo

    Sriram Venneti;Mark P. Dunphy;Hanwen Zhang;Kenneth L. Pitter

  • A Pretargeted PET Imaging Strategy Based on Bioorthogonal Diels–Alder Click Chemistry

    Brian M. Zeglis;Kuntal K. Sevak;Thomas Reiner;Priya Mohindra

  • Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging of Medical Isotopes

    Alessandro Ruggiero;Jason P. Holland;Jason S. Lewis;Jan Grimm

  • Affinity-based proteomics reveal cancer-specific networks coordinated by Hsp90

    Kamalika Moulick;James H Ahn;Hongliang Zong;Anna Rodina

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian M. Zeglis
Brian M. Zeglis Hunter College
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael J. Welch
Michael J. Welch Washington University in St. Louis
Wolfgang A. Weber
Wolfgang A. Weber Technical University of Munich
Jorge A. Carrasquillo
Jorge A. Carrasquillo Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael J. Morris
Michael J. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Carolyn J. Anderson
Carolyn J. Anderson University of Pittsburgh
John L. Humm
John L. Humm Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Gabriela Chiosis
Gabriela Chiosis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Farrokh Dehdashti
Farrokh Dehdashti Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA increasingly involves flexible and affordable online study options. For those aiming for leadership roles in nursing or academia, exploring online phd nursing programs can open doors to advanced research and teaching opportunities.

If you’re already a registered nurse, the transition to a bachelor’s degree is now more accessible thanks to the wide array of rn to bsn online cost options. These bridge programs allow RNs to upgrade their qualifications efficiently and affordably, often while continuing to work full-time.

Non-nurses interested in healthcare leadership can consider direct entry online msn programs, designed to fast-track individuals with a non-nursing background directly into graduate-level nursing practice.

Those just starting out should explore online adn programs for non nurses, which provide entry-level pathways into nursing and faster workforce entry.

Whether you’re beginning your journey or advancing your career, exploring these online options can help you tailor your education to your professional goals and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Jason S. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles