World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
45964
World Ranking
5757
National Ranking
324

Wolfgang A. Weber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang A. Weber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 534 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Wolfgang A. Weber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang A. Weber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolfgang A. Weber is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in the subfields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Genetics, and Surgery.

The main topics of their research work cover:

  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Wolfgang A. Weber has published extensively in scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • EJNMMI Research
  • Theranostics

Some of the recent papers associated with their work are:

  • "Activity and Adverse Events of Actinium-225-PSMA-617 in Advanced Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Failure of Lutetium-177-PSMA," 2020, European Urology
  • "Second Version of the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation Framework Including Response Evaluation for Clinical Trials (PROMISE V2)," 2023, European Urology
  • "Imaging-based target volume reduction in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (PET-Plan): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial," 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • "The Future of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics," 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Novel framework for treatment response evaluation using PSMA-PET/CT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (RECIP 1.0): an international multicenter study," 2022, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Wolfgang A. Weber include:

  • Matthias Eiber
  • Isabel Rauscher
  • Calogero D'Alessandria
  • Robert Tauber
  • Andrei Gafita

Best Publications

  • FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

    Ronald Boellaard;Roberto Delgado-Bolton;Wim J. G. Oyen;Francesco Giammarile

  • Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma

    Malik E. Juweid;Sigrid Stroobants;Otto S. Hoekstra;Felix M. Mottaghy

  • FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0

    Ronald Boellaard;Mike J. O'Doherty;Wolfgang A. Weber;Felix M. Mottaghy

  • Impact of tumor-specific targeting on the biodistribution and efficacy of siRNA nanoparticles measured by multimodality in vivo imaging

    Derek W. Bartlett;Helen Su;Isabel J. Hildebrandt;Wolfgang A. Weber

  • PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

    Florian Lordick;Katja Ott;Bernd-Joachim Krause;Wolfgang A Weber

  • Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction by Metabolic Imaging

    Wolfgang A. Weber;Katja Ott;Karen Becker;Hans-Joachim Dittler

  • Noninvasive Imaging of αvβ3 Integrin Expression Using 18F-labeled RGD-containing Glycopeptide and Positron Emission Tomography

    Roland Haubner;Hans-Jürgen Wester;Wolfgang A. Weber;Christian Mang

  • Breast Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose: Use and Limitations

    N. Avril;C.A. Rosé;M. Schelling;J. Dose

  • Glycosylated RGD-Containing Peptides: Tracer for Tumor Targeting and Angiogenesis Imaging with Improved Biokinetics

    Roland Haubner;Hans-Jürgen Wester;Fred Burkhart;Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke

  • Synthesis and Radiopharmacology of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine for Tumor Imaging

    Hans J. Wester;Michael Herz;Wolfgang Weber;Peter Heiss

  • Noninvasive Visualization of the Activated αvβ3 Integrin in Cancer Patients by Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Galacto-RGD

    Roland Haubner;Wolfgang A Weber;Ambros J Beer;Eugenija Vabuliene

  • Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use

    Wolfgang A. Weber;Volker Petersen;Burkhard Schmidt;Leishia Tyndale-Hines

  • Time Course of Tumor Metabolic Activity During Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Response to Treatment

    Hinrich A. Wieder;Björn L.D.M. Brücher;Frank Zimmermann;Karen Becker

  • Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

    Katja Ott;Wolfgang A. Weber;Florian Lordick;Karen Becker

  • Impact of Animal Handling on the Results of 18F-FDG PET Studies in Mice

    Barbara J. Fueger;Johannes Czernin;Isabel Hildebrandt;Chris Tran

  • Glucose Metabolism of Breast Cancer Assessed by 18F-FDG PET: Histologic and Immunohistochemical Tissue Analysis

    Norbert Avril;Manuela Menzel;Jörg Dose;Marcus Schelling

  • O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine and L-[methyl-11C]methionine uptake in brain tumours: initial results of a comparative study.

    Wolfgang A. Weber;Hans-Jürgen Wester;Anca L. Grosu;Michael Herz

  • Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas using amino acid PET (SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy.

    Anca L. Grosu;Wolfgang A. Weber;Martina Franz;Sibylle Stärk

  • Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT

    Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Ken Herrmann;Jeremie Calais;Boris Hadaschik

  • Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

    Wolfgang A. Weber;Sibylle I. Ziegler;Ralf Thödtmann;Axel-R. Hanauske

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Jason S. Lewis
Jason S. Lewis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Tobias Maurer
Tobias Maurer University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Hans-Jürgen Wester Technical University of Munich
Heiko Schöder
Heiko Schöder Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jorge A. Carrasquillo
Jorge A. Carrasquillo Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ken Herrmann
Ken Herrmann German Cancer Research Center
Michael J. Morris
Michael J. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Howard I. Scher
Howard I. Scher Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways in healthcare can open doors to numerous rewarding careers. For registered nurses aiming to advance, there are affordable rn to bsn programs that make earning a bachelor’s degree both accessible and budget-friendly. These programs are designed with flexibility in mind, allowing you to balance work and study.

If you have a non-nursing background but wish to transition into nursing, consider enrolling in direct entry msn online programs. These offer a swift route to a master’s degree and prepare you for advanced practice roles without having to complete a separate bachelor's first.

Individuals looking for entry-level options can explore adn programs, which typically require less time and are often easier to enter compared to traditional four-year degrees. These programs can be a gateway to a fulfilling nursing career.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. These courses prepare you for in-demand support roles and often come with help to manage tuition costs.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang A. Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles